Reliability and normative values for the foot mobility magnitude: A composite measure of vertical and medial-lateral mobility of the midfoot

Journal of Foot and Ankle Research

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2009, Pages

  McPoil, Thomas G ^a   Vicenzino, Bill ^b   Cornwall, Mark W ^a   Collins, Natalie ^b   Warren, Meghan ^a  

^a NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 74449085259     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17571146     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1757-1146-2-6     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Cavanagh PR, Rodgers MM. The arch index: a useful measure from footprints. J Biomech 1987, 20:547-551. 10.1016/0021-9290(87)90255-7, 3611129.
2. Cowan DH, Jones BH, Robinson JR. Foot morphology characteristics and risk of exercise-related injury. Arch Fam Med 1993, 2:773-777. 10.1001/archfami.2.7.773, 7906597.
3. Song J, Hillstrom HJ, Secord D, Levitt J. Foot type biomechanics. comparison of planus and rectus foot types. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1996, 86:16-23.
4. McPoil TG, Cornwall MW. Use of the longitudinal arch angle to predict dynamic foot posture in walking. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2005, 95:114-120.
5. McPoil TG, Cornwall MW. Prediction of dynamic foot posture during running using the longitudinal arch angle. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2007, 97:102-107.
6. Williams DS, McClay IS. Measurements used to characterize the foot and the medial longitudinal arch: reliability and validity. Phys Ther 2000, 80(9):864-871.
7. McPoil TG, Cornwall MW, Vicenzino B, Teyhan DS, Molloy JM, Christie DS, Collins N. Effect of truncated versus total foot length to calculate the arch height index. Foot 2008, 18:220-227.
8. Menz HB. Alternative techniques for the clinical assessment of foot pronation. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1998, 88:119-129.
9. Brody DM. Techniques in the evaluation and treatment of the injured runner. Orthop Clin North Am 1982, 13:541-558.
10. Picciano AM, Rowlands MS, Worrell T. Reliability of open and closed kinetic chain subtalar joint neutral positions and navicular drop test. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1993, 18:553-558.
11. Sell KE, Verity TM, Worrell TW, Pease BJ, Wigglesworth J. Two measurement techniques for assessing subtalar joint position: a reliability study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1994, 19:162-167.
12. Evans AM, Copper AW, Scharfbillig RW, Scutter SD, Williams MT. Reliability of the foot posture index and traditional measures of foot position. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2003, 93:203-213.
13. Schultz S, Nguyen A-D, Windley T, Kulas A, Botic T, Beynnon B. Intratester and intertester reliability of clinical measures of lower extremity anatomic characteristics: Implications for multicenter studies. Clin J Sport Med 2006, 16:155-161. 10.1097/00042752-200603000-00012, 16603886.
14. McPoil TG, Cornwall MW, Medoff L, Vicenzino B, Forsberg K, Hilz D. Arch height change during sit-to-stand: an alternative for the navicular drop test. J Foot Ankle Res 2008, 1:3. 2553777, 18822154, 10.1186/1757-1146-1-3.
15. Cornwall MW, McPoil TG. Relative movement of the navicular bone during normal walking. Foot Ankle Int 1999, 20:507-512.
16. Vinicombe A, Raspovic A, Menz HB. Reliability of navicular displacement measurement as a clinical indicator of foot posture. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2001, 91:262-268.
17. Billis E, Katsakiori E, Kapodistrias C, Kapreli E. Assessment of foot posture: Correlation between different clinical techniques. Foot 2007, 17:65-72.
18. Brushoj C, Langberg H, Larsen K, Nielsen MB, Holmich P. Reliability and normative values of the foot line test: a technique to assess foot posture. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2007, 37:703-707.
19. McPoil TG, Vicenzino B, Cornwall MW, Collins N. Variations in foot posture and mobility between individuals with anterior knee pain and controls. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2007, 37:A15.
20. Vicenzino B, Collins N, Cleland J, McPoil T. A clinical prediction rule for identifying patients with patellofemoral pain who are likely to benefit from foot orthoses: a preliminary determination. Br J Sport Med 2008, 337. 18819958 .
21. Shrout P, Fleiss J. Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979, 86:420-428. 10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420, 18839484.
22. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977, 33:159-174. 10.2307/2529310, 843571.
23. Rohner-Spengler M, Mannion AF, Babst R. Reliability and minimal detectable change for the figure-of-eight-20 method of, measurement of ankle edema. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2007, 37:199-205.
24. Rothstein JM. Measurement and Clinical Practice: The Theory and Application. Measurement in Physical Therapy 1985, 1. New York: Churchill Livingstone, Rothstein JM.
25. Hopkins WG. Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science. Sports Med 2000, 30:1-15. 10.2165/00007256-200030010-00001, 10907753.
26. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Katz JN, Wright JG. A taxonomy for responsiveness. J Clin Epidemiol 2001, 54:1204-1217. 10.1016/S0895-4356(01)00407-3, 11750189.
27. Menz HB. Two feet, or one person? Problems associated with statistical analysis of paired data in foot and ankle medicine. Foot 2004, 14:2-5.
28. Stratford PW, Goldsmith CH. Use of the standard error as a reliability index of interest: an applied example using elbow flexor strength data. Phys Ther 1997, 77:745-750.
29. Wolf P, Stacoff A, Liu A, Nester C, Arndt A, Lundberg A, Stuessi E. Functional units of the human foot. Gait Posture 2008, 28:434-441. 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.02.004, 18378454.