The features people use to recognize human movement style

Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (Subseries of Lecture Notes in Computer Science)

Volumn 2915, Issue , 2004, Pages 10-19

  Pollick, Frank E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICS; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; VISUAL COMMUNICATION; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTERS;

HUMAN MOTION; HUMAN MOVEMENT; STYLE RECOGNITION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

GESTURE RECOGNITION; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

FEATURE SPACE; HUMAN EMOTION; HUMAN MOVEMENTS; HUMAN PERFORMANCE; VISUAL PERCEPTION; VISUAL STIMULUS;

EID: 7444266920     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-24598-8_2     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (44)

1. Johansson, G.: Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception and Psychophysics 14 (1973) 201-211.
2. Kozlowski, L.T., Cutting, J.E.: Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic pointlight display. Perception and Psychophysics 21 (1977) 575-580.
3. Barclay, C.D., Cutting, J. E., Kozlowski, L. T.: Temporal and spatial factors in gait perception that influence gender recognition. Perception and Psychophysics 23 (1978) 145-152.
4. Cutting, J.E., Kozlowski, L.T.: Recognizing friends by their walk: Gait perception without familiarity cues. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 9 (1977) 353-356.
5. Beardsworth, T., Buckner, T.: The ability to recognize oneself from a video recording of ones movements without seeing ones body. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 18 (1981) 19-22.
6. Hoffman, D.D., Flinchbaugh, B.E.: The interpretation of biological motion. Biological Cybernetics 42 (1982) 195-204.
7. Cutting, J.E., Proffitt, D.: Gait perception as an example of how we may perceive events. In: Walk, R., Pick, Jr. H. (eds.): Intersensory perception and sensory integration. Plenum, New York, New York (1981).
8. Bertenthal, B.I., Pinto, J.: Global processing of biological motions. Psychological Science 5 (1994) 221-225.
9. Runeson, S., Frykholm, G.: Visual perception of lifted weight. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance 7 (1981) 733-740.
10. Runeson, S., Frykholm, G.: Kinematic specification of dynamics as an informational basis for person and action perception: Expectation, gender recognition, and deceptive intention. Journal of Experimental Psychology-General 112 (1983) 585-615.
11. Fox, R., McDaniel, C.: The perception of biological motion by human infants. Science 218 (1982) 486-487.
12. Bertenthal, B.I., Proffitt, D.R., Kramer, S.J., Spetner, N.B.: Infants encoding of kinetic displays varying in relative coherence. Developmental Psychology 23 (1987) 171-178.
13. Mather, G., Radford, K., West, S.: Low-Level Visual Processing of Biological Motion. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 249 (1992) 149-155.
14. Neri, P., Morrone, M.C., Burr, D.C.: Seeing biological motion. Nature 395 (1998) 894-896.
15. Shiffrar, M., Freyd, J.J.: Apparent motion of the human body. Psychological Science 1 (1990) 257-264.
16. Shiffrar, M., Freyd, J.J.: Timing and apparent motion path choice with human body photographs. Psychological Science 4 (1993) 379-384.
17. Thornton, I.M., Pinto, J., Shiffrar, M.: The visual perception of human locomotion. Cognitive Neuropsychology 15 (1998) 535-552.
18. Giese, M.A., Poggio, T., Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements and action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 4 (2003) 179-192.
19. Oram, M.W., Perrett, D.I.: Responses of Anterior Superior Temporal Polysensory (Stpa) Neurons to Biological Motion Stimuli. Journal of CognitiveNeuroscience 6 (1994) 99-116
20. Decety, J., Grezes, J.: Neural mechanisms subserving the perception of human actions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3 (1999) 172-178.
21. Grezes, J., Fonlupt, P., Bertenthal, B., Delon-Martin, C., Segebarth, C., Decety, J.: Does perception of biological motion rely on specific brain regions? Neuroimage, 13 (2001) 775-785.
22. Grossman, E., Donnelly, M., Price, R., Pickens, D., Morgan, V., Neighbor, G., Blake, R.: Brain areas involved in perception of biological motion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12 (2000) 711-720.
23. Adolphs, R.: The neurobiology of social cognition. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 11 (2001) 231-239.
24. Allison, T., Puce, A., &McCarthy, G.: Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (2000) 267-278.
25. Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V.: Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2 (2001) 661-670.
26. Troje, N.F.: Decomposing biological motion: A framework for analysis and synthesis of human gait patterns. Journal of Vision 2 (2002) 371-387.
27. Verfaillie, K.: Orientation-Dependent Priming Effects in the Perception of Biological Motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance 19 (1993) 992-1013.
28. Verfaillie, K.: Transsaccadic memory for the egocentric and allocentric position of a biological-motion walker. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition 23 (1997) 739-760.
29. Verfaillie, K., Detroy, A., Vanrensbergen, J.: Transsaccadic Integration of Biological Motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition 20 (1994) 649-670.
30. Dittrich, W.H.: Action categories and the perception of biological motion. Perception 22 (1991) 15-22.
31. Pollick, F.E., Lestou, V., Ryu, J., Cho, S-B.: Estimating the efficiency of recognizing gender and affect from biological motion. Vision Research 42 (2002) 2345-2355.
32. Pollick, F.E., Kay, J., Heim, K., Stringer, R.: A review of gender recognition from gait. Perception 31 (2002) 118-118.
33. Perrett, D.I., May, K.A., Yoshikawa, S.: Facial shape and judgements of female attractiveness. Nature 368 (1994) 239-242.
34. Perrett, D.I., Lee, K.J., Penton-Voak, I., Rowland, D., Yoshikawa, S., Burt, D.M., Henzi, S.P., Castles, D.L., Akamatsu, S.: Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature 394 (1998) 884-887.
35. Rhodes, G., Brennan, S., Carey, S.: Identification and ratings of caricatures: Implications for learning the mental representations of faces. Cognitive Psychology 19 (1987) 473-497.
36. Rhodes, G.: Superportraits: caricatures and recognition. Psychology Press, Hove, Sussex (1996).
37. Pollick, F.E., Fidopiastis, C.M., Braden, V.: Recognizing the style of spatially exaggerated tennis serves. Perception 30 (2001) 323-338.
38. Hill, H., Pollick, F.E.: Exaggerating temporal differences enhances recognition of individuals from point light displays. Psychological Science 11 (2000) 223-228.
39. Pollick, F.E., Hill, H., Calder, A., Paterson, H.: Recognizing facial expression from spatially and temporally modified movements. Perception 32 (2003) 813-826.
40. Walk, R.D. &Homan, C.P.: Emotion and dance in dynamic light displays. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 22 (1984) 437-440.
41. Dittrich, W.H., Troscianko, T., Lea, S.E.G., Morgan, D.: Perception of emotion from dynamic point-light displays represented in dance. Perception 25 (1996) 727-738.
42. Pollick, F.E., Paterson, H., Bruderlin, A., Sanford, A.J.: Perceiving affect from arm movement. Cognition 82 (2001) B51-B61.
43. Russell, J.A.: A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39 (1980) 1161-1178.
44. Amaya, K., Bruderlin, A., Calvert, T.: Emotion from motion. In: Davis, W.A., Bartels, R. (eds.): Graphics Interface 96, (1996) 222-229.