DCA: A distributed CCA framework based on MPI

Proceedings of the International Workshop on High-Level Programming Models and Supportive Environments, HIPS

Volumn 9, Issue , 2004, Pages 80-89

  Bertrand, Felipe ^a   Bramley, Randall ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMON COMPONENT ARCHITECTURE (CCA); INTERCONNECTION; SCALABILITY; SCIENTIFIC INTERFACE DEFINITION LANGUAGE (SIDL);

COMMUNICATION; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; COMPUTER SYSTEMS; DATA TRANSFER; INTERFACES (COMPUTER); PROBLEM SOLVING; PROGRAM DEBUGGING;

PARALLEL PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 7444264665     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/HIPS.2004.1299193     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. R. Armstrong, D. Gannon, A. Geist, K. Keahey, S. R. Kohn, L. McInnes, S. R. Parker, and B. A. Smolinski. Toward a common component architecture for high-performance scientific computing. In HPDC, 1999.
2. P. Beckman, P. Fasel, W. Humphrey, and S. Mniszewski. Efficient coupling of parallel applications using PAWS. In Proceedings of the High Performance Distributed Computing Conference, Chicago, IL, July 1998.
3. M. D. Beynon, R. Ferreira, T. Kurc, A. Sussman, and J. Saltz. DataCutter: Middleware for filtering very large scientific datasets on archival storage systems. In Proceedings of the 2000 Mass Storage Systems Conference, pages 119-133, College Park, MD, March 2000. IEEE Computer Society Press.
4. K. Chiu. An architecture for concurrent, peer-to-peer components. Technical Report Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Computer Science, Indiana University, March 2001.
5. K. Damevski. Parallel RMI and M-by-N data redistribution using an IDL compiler. Master's thesis, The University of Utah, May 2003.
6. M. Frigo and S. G. Johnson. FFTW: An adaptive software architecture for the FFT. In Proc. 1998 IEEE Intl. Conf. Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing, volume 3, pages 1381-1384. IEEE, 1998.
7. G. A. Geist, II, J. A. Kohl, and P. M. Papadopoulos. CU-MULVS: Providing fault tolerance, visualization, and steering of parallel applications. The International Journal of Supercomputer Applications and High Performance Computing, 11(3):224-235, Fall 1997.
8. T. Goodale, G. Allen, G. Lanfermann, J. Masso, T. Radke, E. Seidel, and J. Shalf. The Cactus framework and toolkit: Design and applications. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Vector and Parallel Processing (VEC-PAR), New York, NY, 2002. Springer-Verlag.
9. M. Govindaraju, S. Krishnan, K. Chiu, A. Slominski, D. Gannon, and R. Bramley. XCAT 2.0: A component-based programming model for grid web services. Technical Report TR562, Department of Computer Science, Indiana University, June 2002.
10. K. Keahey, P. Fasel, and S. Mniszewski. PAWS: Collective interactions and data transfers. In Proceedings of the High Performance Distributed Computing Conference, San Francisco, CA, August 2001.
11. S. Kohn, G. Kumfert, J. Painter, and C. Ribbens. Divorcing language dependencies from a scientific software library. In Proceedings of the 10th SIAM Conference on Parallel Processing, Portsmouth, VA, March 2001. SIAM.
12. G. Kumfert. Understanding the CCA Standard through Decaf. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. UCRL-MA-148390. April, 2003.
13. SCIRun: A Scientific Computing Problem Solving Environment. Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute (SCI), http://software.sci.utah.edu/scirun.html, 2002.
14. K. Sklower, H. Robinson, C. R. Mechoso, L. A. Drummond, J. A. Spahr, and J. D. Farrara. The Distributed Data Broker: A decentralized mechanism for periodic exchange of fields between multiple ensembles of parallel computations. Technical report, Computer Science Dept., University of California, Berkeley.