Demographers and their journals: Who remains uncited after ten years?

Population and Development Review

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 489-506

  van Dalen, Hendrik P ^a,b   Henkens, Kène ^a  

^a NETHERLANDS INTERDISCIPLINARY DEMOGRAPHIC INSTITUTE   (Netherlands)

^b ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEMOGRAPHY;

EID: 7444264226     PISSN: 00987921     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2004.00025.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bott, D. M. and L. L. Hargens. 1991. "Are sociologists' publications uncited? Citation rates of journal articles, chapters and books," The American Sociologist 22: 147-159.
2. Caldwell, J.C. 1996. "Demography and social science," Population Studies 50: 305-333.
3. Cole, S. 1983. "The hierarchy of the sciences," American Journal of Sociology 89: 111-139.
4. Drago, R. and R. Kashian. 2003. "Mapping the terrain of work/family journals," Journal of Family Issues 24: 488-512.
5. Forrest, J. D. and S. Singh. 1990. "The sexual and reproductive behavior of American women, 1982-1988," Family Planning Perspectives 22: 206-214.
6. Frey, B. S. 2003. "Publishing as prostitution? Choosing between one's own ideas and academic success," Public Choice 116: 205-223.
7. Glänzel, W., B. Schlemmer, and B. Thijs. 2003. "Better late than never? On the chance to become highly cited only beyond the standard bibliometric time horizon," Scientometrics 58: 571-586.
8. Guest, A. M. 1994. "Gatekeeping among the demographers," in R. J. Simon and J. J. Fyfe (eds.), Editors as Gatekeepers-Getting Published in the Social Sciences. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 85-106.
9. Hamilton, D. P. 1990. "Publishing by-and for?-the numbers," Science 250: 1331-1332.
10. Hamilton, D.P. 1991. "Research papers-Who's uncited now?, " Science 251: 25.
11. Hargens, L. L. 2000. "Using the literature: Reference networks, reference contexts, and the social structure of scholarship," American Sociological Review 65: 846-865.
12. Klamer, A. and H. P. van Dalen. 2002. "Attention and the art of scientific publishing," Journal of Economic Methodology 9: 289-315.
13. Korobkin, R. 1999. "Ranking journals: Some thoughts on theory and methodology," Florida State University Law Review 26: 850-876.
14. Laband, D. N. and R. D. Tollison. 2003. "Dry holes in economic research," Kyklos 56: 161-174.
15. Merton, R. K. 1968. "The Matthew Effect in science," Science 159: 56-63.
16. Morgan, S. P. and S. Lynch. 2001. "Success and future of demography: The role of data and methods,"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 954: 35-51.
17. Price, D. J. de Solla. 1970. "Citation measures of hard science, soft science, technology, and nonscience," in C. E. Nelson and D. K. Pollock (eds.), Communication Among Scientists and Engineers. Lexington, MA: Heath Lexington Books, pp. 3-22.
18. Teachman, J. D., K. Paasch, and K. P. Carver. 1993. "Thirty years of Demography," Demography 30: 523-532.
19. van Dalen, H. P. 1998. "Accumulating knowledge over the economist's lifetime," Kyklos 51: 359-378.
20. van Dalen, H. P. and K. Henkens. 1999. "How influential are demography journals?," Population and Development Review 25: 229-251.
21. van Dalen, H. P. and K. Henkens. 2001. "What makes a scientific article influential? The case of demographers," Scientometrics 50: 455-482.
22. van de Kaa, D. J. 2003. "Population journals," in P. Demeny and G. McNicoll (eds.), Encyclopedia of Population. New York: Macmillan USA, pp. 555-557.
23. Wooldridge, J. M. 2002. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Zuckerman, H. A. and R. K. Merton. 1973. "Age, aging, and age structure in science," in R. K. Merton, The Sociology of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 497-559.