Agent UML class diagrams revisited

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2592, Issue , 2003, Pages 49-60

  Huget, Marc Philippe ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENCODING (SYMBOLS); MODELING LANGUAGES; SOFTWARE AGENTS; DYNAMICS; GRAPHIC METHODS; INTELLIGENT AGENTS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NETWORK PROTOCOLS; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

AGENT UML; INTER-ACTION PROTOCOLS; UML CLASS DIAGRAMS;

MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS;

MULTIAGENT SYSTEM DESIGN; UML;

EID: 7444264104     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-36559-1_6     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. B. Bauer. UML class diagrams revisited in the context of agent-based systems. In M.Wooldridge, P. Ciancarini, and G.Weiss, editors, Proceedings of Agent-Oriented Software Engineering (AOSE 01), number 2222 in LNCS, pages 1-8, Montreal, Canada, May2001. Springer-Verlag.
2. B. Bauer, J. P. Müller, and J. Odell. An extension of UML by protocols for multiagent interaction. In International Conference on MultiAgent Systems (ICMAS’00), pages 207-214, Boston, Massachussetts, july, 10-12 2000.
3. G. Booch, J. Rumbaugh, and I. Jacobson. The Unified Modeling Language User Guide. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, USA, 1999.
4. P. Bresciani and F. Sannicolo. Requirements analysis in tropos: A self referencing example. In In this volume.
5. Y. Demazeau. Steps towards multi-agent oriented programming. slides Workshop, 1st International Workshop on Multi-Agent Systems, IWMAS ’97, October 1997.
6. Y. Demazeau. VOYELLES. Habilitation à diriger les recherches, Institut National Polytechnique de Grenoble, Grenoble, avril 2001.
7. K. Fernandes and M. Occello. A recursive approach to build hybrid multi-agent systems. In III Iberoamerican Workshop on Distributed Artificial Intelligence and Multi-Agent Systems, SBIA/IBERAMIA, Sao Paulo, Brazil, November 2000.
8. D. Harel. Statecharts: A visual formalism for complex systems. Science of Computer Programming, 8:231-274, 1987.
9. M.-P. Huget. Design agent interaction as a service to agents. In M.-P. Huget, F. Dignum, and J.-L. Koning, editors, AAMAS Workshop on Agent Communication Languages and Conversation Policies (ACL2002), Bologna, Italy, July 2002.
10. C. A. Iglesias, M. Garijo, and J. C. Gonzalez. A survey of agent-oriented methodologies. 1999.
11. J. Müller. The Design of Intelligent Agents-a layered approach. Number LNAI 1177 in Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1996.
12. J. Odell. Objects and agents compared. Journal of Object Computing, 1(1), May 2002.
13. J. Odell, H. V. D. Parunak, and B. Bauer. Extending UML for agents. In G. Wagner, Y. Lesperance, and E. Yu, editors, Proceedings of the Agent-Oriented Information Systems Workshop at the 17th National conference on Artificial Intelligence, Austin, Texas, july, 30 2000. ICue Publishing.
14. J. Swaminathan, S. Smith, and N. Sadeh-Koniecpol. Modeling supply chain dynamics: A multiagent approach. Decision Sciences, April 1997.
15. M. Wooldridge. Reasoning about Rational Agents. MIT Press, 2000.
16. M. Wooldridge, N. R. Jennings, and D. Kinny. The Gaia methodology for agentoriented analysis and design. Journal of Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 3(3):285-312, 2000.