The limits of conscientious objection - May pharmacists refuse to fill prescriptions for emergency contraception?

New England Journal of Medicine

Volumn 351, Issue 19, 2004, Pages 2008-2012

  Cantor, Julie ^a   Baum, Ken ^b  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Wiggin and Dana LLP   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIDANOSINE; INDINAVIR; POSTCOITUS CONTRACEPTIVE AGENT; SILDENAFIL; ZIDOVUDINE;

ABORTION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTRACEPTION; EISENMENGER COMPLEX; EMERGENCY CONTRACEPTION; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS INFECTION; HUMAN RIGHTS; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL LIABILITY; MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT; MORALITY; PATIENT CARE; PHARMACIST; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRESCRIPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR;

BIOETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS; GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;

CODES OF ETHICS; CONSCIENCE; CONTRACEPTIVES, POSTCOITAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MORALS; PHARMACISTS; PREGNANCY; PRESCRIPTIONS, DRUG; REFUSAL TO TREAT; RELIGION AND MEDICINE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 7444264087     PISSN: 00284793     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsb042263     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Drazen JM, Greene MF, Wood AJJ. The FDA, politics, and Plan B. N Engl J Med 2004;350:1561-2.
2. Stanford JB, Hager WD, Crockett SA. The FDA, politics, and Plan B. N Engl J Med 2004;350:2413-4.
3. Alaska Admin. Code tit. 12, § 52.240 (2004).
4. Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 4052 (8) (2004).
5. Hawaii Rev. Stat. § 461-1 (2003).
6. N.M. Admin. Code § 16.19.26.9 (2003).
7. Wash. Rev. Code § 246-863-100 (2004).
8. Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, §§ 13821-13825 (2004).
9. Pharmacist refuses pill for victim. Chicago Tribune. February 11, 2004:C7.
10. Simon S. Pharmacists new players in abortion debate. Los Angeles Times. March 20, 2004:A18.
11. Sweeney JF. May a pharmacist refuse to fill a prescription? Plain Dealer. May 5, 2004:E1.
12. Associated Press. Pharmacist refuses to fill morning after prescription. (Accessed October 14, 2004, at http://www.thechamplainchannel.com/wnne/3761928/ detail.html.)
13. Sauer M. Pharmacist to be fired in abortion controversy. St. Petersburg Times. December 19, 1991:1B.
14. State policies in brief: refusing to provide health services. New York: Alan Guttmacher Institute, September 1, 2004. (Accessed October 14, 2004 at http://www.guttmacher.org/statecenter/spibs/spib_RPHS.pdf.)
15. Seeley RA. Advice for conscientious objectors in the armed forces. 5th ed. Philadelphia; Central Committee for Conscientious Objectors, 1998:1-2. (Accessed October 14, 2004, at http://www.objector.org/Resources/adviceforcos. pdf.)
16. 42 U.S.C. § 300a-7 (2004).
17. Mich. House Bill No. 5006 (As amended April 21, 2004).
18. Oregon House Bill No. 2010 (As amended May 11, 1999).
19. Hooks Super X, Inc. v. McLaughlin, 642 N.E. 2d 514 (Ind. 1994).
20. Section 2.01. In: Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. Code of medical ethics: current opinions with annotations. 2002-2003 ed. Chicago: American Medical Association, 2002.
21. Oregon Revised Statute § 127.885 § 4.01 (4) (2003).
22. Fassett WE, Wicks AC. Is pharmacy a profession? In: Weinstein BD, ed. Ethical issues in pharmacy. Vancouver, Wash.: Applied Therapeutics, 1996:1-28.
23. American Pharmacists Association. Code of ethics for pharmacists: preamble. (Accessed October 14, 2004, at http://www.aphanet.org/pharmcare/ ethics.html.)
24. Hughes EC, ed. Obstetric-gynecologic terminology, with section on neonatology and glossary of congenital anomalies. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis, 1972.
25. Commodity Supplemental Food Program, 7 C.F.R. § 247.2 (2004).
26. Glasier A. Emergency postcoital contraception. N Engl J Med 1997;337:1058-64.
27. Daily reproductive health report: state politics & policy: Washington governor signs law requiring hospitals to offer emergency contraception to rape survivors. Menlo Park, Calif.: Kaiser-network, April 2, 2002. (Accessed October 14, 2004, at http://www.kaisernetwork.org/daily_reports/rep_index.cfm?hint= 2&DR_ID=10366.)
28. Brownfield v. Daniel Freeman Marina Hospital, 208 Cal. App. 3d 405 (Cal. Ct. App. 1989).
29. Shelton v. Univ. of Medicine & Dentistry, 223 F.3d 220 (3d Cir. 2000).
30. Tribe LH. American constitutional law. 2nd ed. Mineola, N.Y.: Foundation Press, 1988:1183.
31. Brody JE. The politics of emergency contraception. New York Times. August 24, 2004:F7.
32. Trans World Airlines v. Hardison, 432 U.S. 63 (1977).
33. 1997-98 APhA Policy Committee report: pharmacist conscience clause. Washington, D.C.: American Pharmacists Association, 1997.
34. Politics wins over science. Capital Times. May 13, 2004:16A.
35. Alford S, Davis L, Brown L. Pharmacists' attitudes and awareness of emergency contraception for adolescents. Transitions 2001;12(4):1-17.
36. Foster DG, Harper CC, Bley JJ, et al. Knowledge of emergency contraception among women aged 18 to 44 in California. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:150-6.
37. United States v. Macintosh, 283 U.S. 605, 634 (1931) (Hughes, C.J., dissenting).
38. Elliott D. Alabama nurses quit over morning-after pill. Presented on All Things Considered. Washington, D.C.: National Public Radio, July 28, 2004 (transcript).