Comparing agent-oriented methodologies

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3030, Issue , 2004, Pages 78-93

  Dam, Khanh Hoa ^a   Winikoff, Michael ^a  

^a RMIT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION USE; MODELING LANGUAGES; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; COMPUTER SCIENCE;

AGENT-BASED SYSTEMS; AGENT-ORIENTED METHODOLOGY; ATTRIBUTE-BASED; EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION; PROMETHEUS;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS;

AGENT-BASED SYSTEMS; AGENT-ORIENTED METHODOLOGIES; OBJECTIVITY; QUESTIONNARIE;

EID: 7444261503     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-25943-5_6     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Paolo Bresciani, Paolo Giorgini, Fausto Giunchiglia, John Mylopoulos, and Anna Perini. Troops: An agent-oriented software development methodology. Technical Report DIT-02-0015, University of Trento, Department of Information and Communication Technology, 2002
2. Paolo Busetta, Ralph R¨onnquist, Andrew Hodgson, and Andrew Lucas. JACK Intelligent Agents-Components for IntelligentAgents in Java. Technical report,Agent Oriented Software Pty. Ltd, Melbourne, Australia, 1998
3. G. Caire, F. Leal, P. Chainho, R. Evans, F.G. Jorge, G. Juan Pavon, P. Kearney, J. Stark, and P Massonet. Project p907, deliverable 3: Methodology for agent-oriented software neginnering. Technical Information Final version, European Institute for Research and Strategic Studies in Telecommunications (EURESCOM), 09 2001
4. Giovanni Caire, Francisco Leal, Paulo Chainho, Richard Evans, Francisco Garijo, Jorge Gomez, Juan Pavon, Paul Kearney, Jamie Stark, and Philippe Massonet. Agent oriented analysis using MESSAGE/UML. In MichaelWooldridge, Paolo Ciancarini, and GerhardWeiss, editors, Second International Workshop on Agent-Oriented Software Engineering (AOSE-2001), pages 101-108, 2001
5. L. Cernuzzi and G. Rossi. On the evaluation of agent oriented modeling methods. In Proceedings of Agent Oriented Methodology Workshop, Seattle, November 2002
6. P. R. Cohen and H. J. Levesque. Teamwork. Nous, 25(4):487-512, 1991
7. Khanh Hoa Dam. Evaluating and comparing agent-oriented software engineering methodologies. Masters minor thesis, School of Computer Science and Information Technology, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia, June 2003. (supervisors: MichaelWinikoff and Lin Padgham)
8. Scott A. DeLoach. Analysis and design using MaSE and agentTool. In Proceedings of the 12th Midwest Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science Conference (MAICS 2001), 2001
9. Scott A. DeLoach, Mark F.Wood, and Clint H. Sparkman. Multiagent systems engineering. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, 11(3):231-258, 2001
10. Berard E.V. Acomparison of object-oriented methodologies. Technical report, ObjectAgency Inc., 1995
11. U. Frank. Evaluating modelling languages: relevant issues, epistemological challenges and a preliminary research framework. Technical Report 15, Arbetsberichte des Instituts fuer Wirtshaftsinformatik (Universität Koblenz-Landau), 1998
12. Fausto Giunchiglia, John Mylopoulos, and Anna Perini. The Tropos software development methodology: Processes, Models and Diagrams. In Third International Workshop on Agent-Oriented Software Engineering, July 2002
13. S. Hong, G. Van den Goor, and S. Brinkkemper. A formal approach to the comparison of object-oriented analysis and design methodologies. In The Twenty-Sixth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pages 689-699, Hawaii, 1993
14. N. R. Jennings. An agent-based approach for building complex software systems. Communications of the ACM, 44(4):35-41, 2001
15. Michael Luck, Peter McBurney, and Chris Preist. Agent technology: Enabling next generation computing: A roadmap for agent-based computing. AgentLink report, available from www.agentlink.org/roadmap., 2003
16. S. A. O’Malley and S. A. DeLoach. Determining when to use an agent-oriented software engineering. In Proceedings of the Second InternationalWorkshop On Agent-Oriented Software Engineering (AOSE-2001), pages 188-205, Montreal, May 2001
17. Lin Padgham. Design of multi agent systems. Tutorial notes, available from the author, July 2003
18. Lin Padgham and Michael Winikoff. Prometheus: A methodology for developing intelligent agents. In Third InternationalWorkshop on Agent-Oriented Software Engineering, July 2002
19. Lin Padgham and Michael Winikoff. Prometheus: A pragmatic methodology for engineering intelligent agents. In Proceedings of the OOPSLA 2002 Workshop on Agent-Oriented Methodologies, pages 97-108, Seattle, November 2002
20. Lin Padgham and Michael Winikoff. Developing Intelligent Agent Systems: A Practical Guide. JohnWiley & sons, Ltd., 2004. ISBN 0-470-86120-7
21. David Poutakidis, Lin Padgham, and Michael Winikoff. Debugging multi-agent systems using design artifacts: The case of interaction protocols. In Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi Agent Systems (AAMAS’02), 2002
22. Michael Prasse. Evaluation of object-oriented modelling languages: A comparison between OML and UML. In Martin Schader and Axel Korthaus, editors, The Unified Modeling Language-Technical Aspects and Applications, pages 58-75. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1998
23. J. Rumbaugh. Notation notes: Principles for choosing notation. Journal of Object-Oriented Programming (JOOP), 8(10):11-14, May 1996
24. Onn Shehory and Arnon Sturm. Evaluation of modeling techniques for agent-based systems. In Jörg P. Müller, Elisabeth Andre, Sandip Sen, and Claude Frasson, editors, Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Autonomous Agents, pages 624-631.ACM Press, May 2001
25. A. Sturm and O. Shehory. Towards industrially applicable modeling technique for agentbased systems (poster). In Proceedings of International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, Bologna, July 2002
26. Arnon Sturm and Onn Shehory. A framework for evaluating agent-oriented methodologies. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Bi-Conference Workshop on Agent-Oriented Information Systems (at AAMAS03), July 2003
27. Michael Winikoff and Lin Padgham. The prometheus methodology. In Federico Bergenti, Marie-Pierre Gleizes, and Franco Zambonelli, editors, Methodologies and Software Engineering for Agent Systems, chapter 11. Kluwer Academic Publishing (NewYork), 2004
28. B. Wood, R. Pethia, L.R. Gold, and R Firth. A guide to the assessment of software development methods. Technical Report 88-TR-8, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 1988
29. M. Wooldridge, N.R. Jennings, and D. Kinny. A methodology for agent-oriented analysis and design. In Proceedings of the third international conference on Autonomous Agents (Agents-99), Seattle,WA, May 1999. ACM
30. M. Wooldridge, N.R. Jennings, and D. Kinny. The Gaia methodology for agent-oriented analysis and design. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 3(3), 2000
31. E. Yu. Modelling Strategic Relationships for Process Reengineering. PhD thesis, University of Toronto, Department of Computer Science, 1995.