Query clustering for boosting web page ranking

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3034, Issue , 2004, Pages 164-175

  Baeza Yates, Ricardo ^a   Hurtado, Carlos ^a   Mendoza, Marcelo ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHILE   (Chile)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DE VALPARAÍSO   (Chile)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLUSTERING ALGORITHMS; SEARCH ENGINES; ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; COSTS; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; SEMANTICS;

CLUSTERING PROCESS; COMPUTATIONAL COSTS; FORMAL APPROACH; QUERY CLUSTERING; RANKING ALGORITHM; RETRIEVAL QUALITY; WEB PAGE RANKING; COMPUTATIONAL COST; LOGS;

WEBSITES;

EID: 7444254086     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-24681-7_19     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. R. Baeza-Yates. Query usage mining in search engines. Web Mining: Applications and Techniques, Anthony Scime, editor. Idea Group, 2004.
2. R. Baeza-Yates and B. Ribeiro-Neto. Modern Information Retrieval, chapter 3, 75-79. Addison-Wesley, 1999.
3. D. Beeferman and A. Berger. Agglomerative clustering of a search engine query log. In KDD, 407-416, Boston, MA USA, 2000.
4. C. Ding and C. Chi. Towards an adaptive and task-specific ranking mechanism in web searching (poster session). In Proceedings of the 23rd annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, 375-376, Athens, Greece, 2000. ACM Press. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/345508.345663.
5. H. Frei and P. Schuble. Determining the effectiveness of retrieval algorithms. Information Processing and Management, 27(2):153-164, 1991.
6. M. Jansen, A. Spink, J. Bateman, and T. Saracevic. Real life information retrieval: a study of user queries on the web. ACM SIGIR Forum, 32(1):5-17, 1998.
7. J. Kleinberg. Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. ACMSIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), 46(5):604-632, 1998. http://www.cs.cornell.edu/home/kleinber/auth.pdf.
8. P. Lawrence, S. Brin, R. Motwani, and T. Winograd. The pagerank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web. Stanford Digital Library Technologies Project, 1998. http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/page98pagerank.html.
9. S. Lawrence and C. Giles. Searching the web: General and scientific information access. IEEE Communications, 37(1):116-122, 1999.
10. M. Lesk and G. Salton. Relevance assessments and retrieval system evaluation. Information Storage and Retrieval, 4(3):343-359, 1968.
11. P. Marendy. A review of world wide web searching techniques. http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/559198.html, 2001.
12. M. Oconnor and J. Herlocker. Clustering items for collaborative filtering. Technical report, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 1999. http://www.cs.umbc.edu/ian/sigir99-rec/papers.
13. A. Rees and D. Schultz. A field experimental approach to the study of relevance assessments in relation to document searching. Technical report, NFS, 1967.
14. I. Silva, B. Ribeiro-Neto, P. Calado, E. Moura, and N. Ziviani. Link-based and content-based evidential information in a belief network model. In Proc of the 23rd ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 96-103, Athens, Greece, July 2000.
15. J. Wen, J. Nie, and H. Zhang. Clustering user queries of a search engine. In Proc. at 10th International World Wide Web Conference, 162-168. W3C, 2001.
16. B. Yuwono. Search and ranking algorithms for locating resources on world wide web. In International Conference on Data Engineering, 164-171. ICDE, 1996.
17. D. Zhang and Y. Dong. A novel web usage mining approach for search engines. Computer Networks Elsevier, 303-310, Abril 2002.
18. Y. Zhao and G. Karypis. Comparison of agglomerative and partitional document clustering algorithms. In SIAM Workshop on Clustering High-dimensional Data and its Applications, 2002.
19. Y. Zhao and G. Karypis. Criterion functions for document clustering. Technical report, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 2002.