Architectural design for the survival optimization of panicking fleeing victims

Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (Subseries of Lecture Notes in Computer Science)

Volumn 2801, Issue , 2003, Pages 97-106

  Escobar, Rodrigo ^a   De La Rosa, Armando ^a  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARCHITECTURE; FLOW VELOCITY; ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PATIENT MONITORING; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION;

FLOW OUT; LARGE ROOMS;

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; MEDICAL PROBLEMS;

EVOLUTION; PANICKING INDIVIDUALS; SURVIVAL OPTIMIZATION; VICTIM FLOW VELOCITY;

EID: 7444253841     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-39432-7_11     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. Helbing D., Farkas I., Vicsek T. Simulating dynamical features of escape panic. Nature 407. (2000) 487-490.
2. Helbing D., Farkas I., Vicsek T. (2000). Panic: a quantitative analysis. Web page supplement to reference 1. Available from: http://angel.elte.hu/~panic/
3. Axelrod R. The evolution of cooperation. U.S.A. Basic Books. (1984).
4. Stanton R.J.C., Wanless G.K. Pedestrian movement. Safety Science, Vol. 18, issue 4. (1995) 291-300.
5. Thompson P.A., Marchant E.W. Computer and fluid modeling of evacuation. Safety Science, Vol. 18, issue 4. (1995) 277-289.
6. Kirchner A., Schadschneider A. Simulation of evacuation processes using a bionicsinspired cellular automaton model for pedestrian dynamics. Physica A312. (2002). 260-276.
7. Still G.K. Crowd dynamics, simple solutions to complex problems. PhD Thesis, University of Warwick. (2000).
8. Smith R. A. Density, velocity and flow relationships for closely packed crowds. Safety Science, Vol. 18, issue 4. (1995). 321-327.
9. Riddel, J., Barr, I. In [5].
10. Volchenkov, D., Blanchard, P. A toy society under attack. How to make panic to subside. International Conference SocioPhysics. Bielefeld, Germany. (2002).