A repeated sampling bone chamber methodology for the evaluation of tissue differentiation and bone adaptation around titanium implants under controlled mechanical conditions

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 37, Issue 12, 2004, Pages 1819-1822

  Duyck, Joke ^a   Cooman, Michel De ^b   Puers, Robert ^b   Oosterwyck, Hans Van ^c   Sloten, Jos Vander ^c   Naert, Ignace ^a  

^a CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b 3001   (Belgium)

^c Celestijnenlaan 100A ^*  (Belgium)

Author keywords

Bone chamber; Bone response; Dynamic loading; Rabbit tibia; Titanium implant

Indexed keywords

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; MOUNTINGS; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM; SAMPLING; TISSUE; TITANIUM;

BONE ADAPTATION; BONE CHAMBER METHODOLOGY;

IMPLANTS (SURGICAL);

TITANIUM;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE GROWTH; CONTROLLED STUDY; IMPLANT; METHODOLOGY; MODEL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TIBIA; TISSUE DIFFERENTIATION; TRABECULAR BONE;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; BONE AND BONES; MATERIALS TESTING; OSSEOINTEGRATION; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; RABBITS; TITANIUM;

EID: 7444250362     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.02.044     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Aspenberg P., Goodman S., Toksvig-Larsen S., Ryd L., Albrektsson T. Intermittent micromotion inhibits bone growth. Ti implants in rabbits. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. 63:1992;141-145
2. Cullen D.M., Smith R.T., Akhter M.P. Bone-loading response varies with strain magnitude and cycle number. Journal of Applied Physiology. 91:2001;1971-1976
3. Duyck J., Rønold H.J., Van Oosterwyck H., Naert I., Vander Sloten J., Ellingsen J.E. The influence of static and dynamic loading on the marginal bone behaviour around implants, an animal experimental study. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 12:2001;207-218
4. Frost H.M. Bone "mass" and the "mechanostat" A proposal. Anatomical Record. 219:1987;1-9
5. Goodman S., Wang J.-S., Doshi A., Aspenberg P. Difference in bone growth after one versus two daily episodes of micromotion, experiment with Ti chambers in rabbits. Biomedical Materials Research. 27:1993;1419-1424
6. Hoshaw S.J., Brunski J.B., Cochran G.V.B. Mechanical loading of Brånemark implants affects interfacial bone modelling and remodelling. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. 9:1994;345-360
7. Hsieh Y.F., Turner C.H. Effects of loading frequency on mechanically induced bone formation. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 16:2001;918-924
8. Isidor F. Histological evaluation of peri-implant bone at implants subjected to occlusal overload or plaque accumulation. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 8:1997;1-9
9. Ko C.-C., Swift J.Q., DeLong R., Douglas W.H., Kim Y.I., An K.-N., Chang C.-H., Huang H.-L. An intra-oral hydraulic system for controlled loading of dental implants. Journal of Biomechanics. 35:2002;863-869
10. Moalli M.R., Caldwell N.J., Patil P.V., Goldstein S.A. An in vivo model for investigations of mechanical signal transduction in trabecular bone. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 15:2000;1346-1353
11. Mosley J.E., Lanyon L.E. Strain rate as a controlling influence on adaptive modelling in response to dynamic loading of the ulna in growing male rats. Bone. 23:1998;313-318
12. O'Connor J.A., Lanyon L.E., MacFie H. The influence of strain rate on adaptive bone remodelling. Journal of Biomechanics. 15:1982;767-781
13. Rubin C.T., Lanyon L.E. Regulation of bone formation by applied dynamic loads. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 66-A:1984;397-402