The transient house heating condition - The daily changes of the building envelope response factor (BER)

Renewable Energy

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 537-549

  Lukic N ^a  

^a Kragujevac University   (Serbia)

Author keywords

Dynamical model of house; Response factor; Transient condition

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENERGY UTILIZATION; HEATING; HOUSES; RADIATORS; THERMAL INSULATION;

BUILDING ENVELOPE RESPONSE FACTOR (BER); HOUSE WALLS; THERMAL COMFORT; TRANSIENT HOUSE HEATING;

RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES;

BUILDING; HEATING SYSTEM;

EID: 7444242744     PISSN: 09601481     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2004.07.003     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Lukić N. The transient house heating condition - the building envelope response factor (BER). Renewable Energy 2003;28:523-32.
2. Judkoff RD, Neymark JS. A procedure for testing the ability of whole building energy simulation programs to thermally model the building fabric. J Solar Energy Eng 1995;117:7-15.
3. Chou SK, Chang WL. Effects of multi-parameter changes on energy use of large buildings. Int J Energy Res 1993;17:885-903.
4. Price BA, Smith TF. Thermal response of composite building envelopes accounting for thermal radiation. Energy Convers Manage 1995;36(1):23-33.
5. Mathews EH, Richards PG, Lombard C. A first-order thermal model for building design. Energy Bldg 1994;21:133-45.
6. Bojić M, Lukić N. Numerical evaluation of solar-energy use through passive heating of weekend houses in Yugoslavia. Renewable Energy 2000;20:207-22.
7. Haghighat F, Liang H. Determination of transient heat conduction through building envelope. ASHRAE Trans 1992;98:1-284.
8. Athientitis AK. A methodology for integrated building HVAC system thermal analysis. Bldg Environ 1993;28(4):483-96.
9. Richards PG, Mathews EH. A thermal design tool for buildings in ground contact. Bldg Environ 1994;29(1):73-82.
10. Kreider JF, Haberl JS. Predicting hourly building energy use: the great energy predictor shootout -overview and discussion of results, OR-94-17-7.
11. Reddy TA, Claridge DE. Using synthetic data to evaluate multiple regression and principal component analyses for statistical modeling of daily building energy consumption. Energy Bldg 1994;21:35-44.
12. Kajl S, Malinowski P, Czogala E, Balazinski M. Fuzzy logic and neural networks approach to thermal description of buildings. In: EUFIT'95, August 28-31, Aachen, Germany; 1995.
13. Lam JC, Hui SCM. Sensitivity analysis of energy performance of office buildings. Bldg Environ 1996;31(1):27-39.
14. Tuomaala P, Rahola J. Combined air flow and thermal simulation of buildings. Bldg Environ 1995;30(2): 265-6.
15. Clarke JA, Strachan PA, Simulation of conventional and renewable building energy systems. Renewable Energy 1994;5:1178-89. Part II.
16. Scott M, Wrench LE, Hadley DL. Effects of climate change on commercial building energy demand. Energy Sour 1994;16:317-32.
17. Bojić M, Milovanović M, Loveday DL. Thermal behavior of a building with a slanted roof. Energy Bldg 1997;26:145-51.
18. Norford LK, Socolow RH, Hsieh ES, Spadaro GV. Two-to-one discrepancy between measured and predicted performance of a 'low-energy' office building: insights from a reconciliation based on the DOE-2 model. Energy Bldg 1994;21:121-31.
19. US Department of Commerce. DOE-2 reference manual, Parts 1 and 2, version 2.1. Springfield, VA: US Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service; 1981.
20. BLAST Support Office. The building analysis and system thermodynamics program, version 3, users' manual Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois; 1992.
21. ASHRAE handbook of fundamentals. Georgia: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-conditioning Engineers.
22. Moller SK, Wooldridge M.I. User's guide for the computer program BUNYIP: building energy investigation package, version 2.0. Technical report TR6. Division of Energy Technology, CISRO, Victoria, Australia; 1994.
23. Crawley DB, Lawrie LK, Winkehnann FC, Pedersen CO. 2001. EnergyPlus: new capabilities in a whole-building energy simulation program. Proceedings of building simulation, IBPSA, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, August 2001. p. 51-8.
24. Lee J, Strand RK. 2001. An analysis of the effect of the building envelope on thermal comfort using the EnergyPlus program. Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture proceedings of the ACSA technology conference, Austin, Texas, 13-16 July 2001.
25. Crawley DB, Lawrie LK, Winkelmann FC, Pedersen CO. EnergyPlus: a new-generation building energy simulation program. Proceedings of forum 2001: solar energy: the power to choose, 21-25 April 2001. Washington, DC. Boulder, CO: ASES.