The use of artificial substrates in different growth conditions

Ekologia Bratislava

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 192-206

  Komárek, Ondřej ^a   Sukačová, Kateřina ^a  

^a MASARYK UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Artificial substrate; CANOCO; Periphyton; Pollution indication; Succession timing

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; ARTIFICIAL SUBSTRATE; CANONICAL ANALYSIS; COMMUNITY COMPOSITION; POLLUTION MONITORING; WATER POLLUTION;

EID: 7444234391     PISSN: 1335342X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Antoine, S.E., Benson-Evans, K., 1985: Colonisation rates of benthic algae on four different substrata. Limnologica , 16, p. 307-313.
2. Begon, M., Harper, J.L., Towsend, C.R., 1990: Ecology: individuals, populations and communities. Blackwell Scientific Publications, 986 pp.
3. Brown, H.D., 1976: A comparison of the attached algal communities of a natural and an artificial substrate. J. Phycol., 12, p. 301-306.
4. Cox, E., 1990: Studies on the algae of a small softwater stream. III. Interaction between discharge, sediment composition and diatom flora. Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl. Monogr. Beitr., 83, p. 567-584.
5. DeNicola, D.M., McIntire, C.D., Lamberti, G.A., Gregory, S.V., Ashkenas, L.A., 1990: Temporal patterns of grazer-periphyton interactions in laboratory streams. Freshwater Biol., 23, p. 475-489.
6. DeNicola, D.M., 1996: Periphyton Responses to Temperature at Different Ecological Levels. In Stevenson, R.J., Bothwell, M.L., Lowe, R.L. (eds): Algal Ecology - Freshwater Benthic Ecosystems. Academic Press, 6, p. 149-181.
7. Hansmann, E.V., Phinney, H.K., 1973: Effect of logging on periphyton in coastal streams of Oregon. Ecology, 54, p. 194-199.
8. Hill, W.R., 1996: Effects of light (Chapter 5) in Algal Ecology, Freshwater Benthic Ecosystems. Section Two - Factors affecting benthic algae. Academic Press, 753 pp.
9. Hoagland, K.D., Roemer, S.C., Rosowski, J.R., 1982: Colonization and community structure of two periphyton assemblages with emphasis on the diatoms (Bacillariophyceae). Am. J. Bot., 69, p. 188-213.
10. Hynes, H.B.N., 1970: The ecology of running waters. Liverpool University Press. 123 Growe Street, Liverpool L7 7AF, 555 pp.
11. Kann, E., 1958: Der Algenaufwuchs in der eulitoralen Zone alpiner und norddeutscher Seen. Verh. I.V.L, 13, p. 311-319.
12. Lowe, R.L., Pan, Y., 1996: Benthic Algal Communities as Biological Monitors (Chapter 22) in Algal Ecology. In Stevenson, R.J., Bothwell, M.L., Lowe, R.L. (eds): Freshwater Benthic Ecosystems. Section Three - The niche of benthic algae in freshwater ecosystems. Academic Press, 753 pp.
13. Lowe, R.L., McCulough, J.M., 1974: The effect of seawage-treatment-plant effluent on diatom communities of the Portage River, Wood Country, Ohio. Ohio J. Sci., 74, p. 154-161.
14. Mc Intire, C.D., 1964: Some effects of current velocity on periphyton communities in laboratory streams. Hydrobiologia, 27, p. 559-570.
15. Morgan, M.D., 1987: Impact of nutrient enrichment and alcalinization on periphyton communities in the New Jersey Pine Barrens. Hydrobiol., 144, p. 233-241.
16. Peterson, C.G., Hoagland, K.D., Stevenson, R.L., 1990: Timing of wave disturbance and the resilience and recover of a freshwater epilithic microalgal community. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc., 9, p. 54-67.
17. Peterson, C.G., Stevenson, R.J., 1992: Resistance and resilience of lotie algal communities: Importance of disturbance timing and current. Ecology, 73, p. 1445-1461.
18. Rosgen, D., Silvey, H.L., 1996: Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology Books. Printed Media Companies, Mineapolis, Minesota, 198 pp.
19. Rott, E., 1997: Ecophysiological profiling of phycoperiphyton species, a useful approach to qualify river ecosystem health. Phycologia, 36, Suppl. 4, p. 94-95.
20. Slädečková, A., 1962: Limnological investigation methods for the periphyton ("Aufwuchs") community. Bot. Review, 28, p. 286-350.
21. Sorensen, T., 1948: A method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant society based on similarity of species content. K. Danske Vidensk. Selsk., 5, p. 1-34.
22. Steinman A.D., McIntire, C.D., Gregory, S.V., Lamberti, G.A., Ashkenas, L., 1987a: Effect of herbivore type and density on taxonomic structure and physiognomy of algal assemblages in laboratory streams. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc., 6, p. 175-188.
23. Steinman, A.D., McIntire, C.D., 1986: Effects of current velocity and light on the structure of periphyton assemblages in laboratory streams. J. Phycol., 22, p. 352-361.
24. Stevenson, R.J., 1996: The stimulation of Drag and Current (Chapter 11) in Algal Ecology, Freshwater Benthic Ecosystems. Section Two - Factors affecting benthic algae. Academic Press, 753 pp.
25. Stevenson, R.J., Lowe, R.L., 1986: Sampling and interpretation of algal patterns for water quality assessment. In "Rationale for Sampling and Interpretation of Ecological Data in the Assessment of Freshwater Ecosystems" (B. Isom, ed.), ASTM STP 894, Am. Soc. Test. Mater., Philadelphia.
26. Terr Braak, C.J.F., Šmilauer, P., 1998: CANOCO reference manual and user's guide to Canoco for Windows. Centre for Biometry, Wageningen, 351 pp.
27. Tuchman, N.C., Stevenson, R.J., 1991: Effects of selective grazing by snails on benthic algal communities. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc., 10, p. 430-443.
28. Wetzel, R.L., 1979: Methods and Measurements of periphyton communities: A Review, ASTM 690, 1916 Race Street, Philadelphia, Pa. 19103.
29. Ward, J.V., 1992: Aquatic Insect Ecology. 1. Biology and Habitat. J. Wiley & Sons, Inc., 428 pp.