Energetics of hydrogen bond network rearrangements in liquid water

Science

Volumn 306, Issue 5697, 2004, Pages 851-853

  Smith, Jared D ^a   Cappa, Christopher D ^a   Wilson, Kevin R ^a   Messer, Benjamin M ^a   Cohen, Ronald C ^a   Saykally, Richard J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSORPTION; ICE; JETS; MELTING; SUPERCOOLING; THERMAL EFFECTS; WATER; X RAY ANALYSIS;

LIQUID MICROJETS; THERMAL ENERGY; WATER DROPLETS;

HYDROGEN BONDS;

OXYGEN; WATER;

CHEMISTRY;

ARTICLE; DATA ANALYSIS; ENERGY TRANSFER; HEAT; HYDROGEN BOND; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION ABSORPTION; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; TEMPERATURE; X RAY;

EID: 7444231098     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1102560     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Ph. Wernet et al., Science 304, 995 (2004).
2. F. H. Stillinger, Science 209, 451 (1980).
3. W. L Jorgensen et al., J. Chem. Phys. 79, 926 (1983).
4. A. Geiger, H. E. Stanley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1749 (1982).
5. H. E. Stanley, J. Teixeira, J. Chem. Phys. 73, 3404 (1980).
6. I. W. Kuo, C. J. Mundy, Science 303, 658 (2004).
7. B. Hetenyi, F. De Angelis, P. Giannozzi, R. Car, J. Chem. Phys. 120, 8632 (2004).
8. A. Luzar, D. Chandler, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 8160 (1993).
9. G. A. Jeffrey, Introduction to Hydrogen Bonding (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1997), pp. 11-12.
10. K. R. Wilson et al., J. Phys. Contiens. Matter 14, L221 (2002).
11. S. Myneni et al., J. Phys. Condens. Matter 14, L213 (2002).
12. H. Bluhm et al., J. Phys. Condens. Matter 14, L227 (2002).
13. J.-H. Guo et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 137402 (2002).
14. K. R. Wilson et al., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 75, 725 (2004).
15. U. Bergmann et al., Phys. Rev. B 66, 092107 (2002).
16. See supporting data on Science Online.
17. R. Corban, M. D. Zeidler, Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 96, 1463 (1992).
18. pre) = -ΔE/RT + ln(a) where a is a constant with respect to temperature. If other H-bonding configurations also produce appreciable absorption in these regions, we would expect deviations from linearity. Therefore, the quality of the linear fit evident in Fig. 2 is an indication that this simple model is appropriate, at least as a first approximation. This type of analysis is similar to that used to interpret the temperature-dependent Raman spectrum of liquid water (19, 20).
19. D. E. Hare, C. M. Sorenson, J. Chem. Phys. 93, 6954 (1990).
20. G. E. Walrafen, in Wafer: A Comprehensive Treatise, F. Franks, Ed. (Plenum, New York, 1972), vol. 1.
21. S. J. Suresh, V. M. Naik J. Chem. Phys. 113, 9727 (2000).
22. R. L. Blumberg et al., J. Chem. Phys. 80, 5230 (1984).
23. The energetic cutoff is defined such that two molecules are considered H-bonded to one another only if the computed pair potential is less than -4 kcal/mol. Furthermore, if any molecule has more than four H bonds according to the cutoff, only the four strongest bonds are considered.
24. F. H. Stillinger, A. Rahman, J. Chem. Phys. 60, 1545 (1974).
25. J. M. Sorenson et al., J. Chem. Phys. 113, 9149 (2000).
26. Supported by the National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate Fellowship Program (C.D.C.) and by the Chemical Sciences Division of the U.S. Department of Energy. This research was carried out at the Advanced Light Source (ALS) beamline 8.0.1, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. The Advanced Light Source is supported by the Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Sciences Division, of the U.S. Department of Energy under contract DE-AC03-76SF00098 at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. We thank the ALS staff, including M. Gilles, B. Rude, and J. Denlinger, for assistance.