Evolving developmental programs for adaptation, morphogenesis, and self-repair

Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (Subseries of Lecture Notes in Computer Science)

Volumn 2801, Issue , 2003, Pages 256-265

  Miller, Julian F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; GENES; MICROORGANISMS; BIOLOGY; CYTOLOGY; REPAIR;

CELL GENOTYPES; ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNALS; MORPHOGENESIS; MULTICELLULAR ORGANISM;

CELL CULTURE; CELLS;

DIFFERENTIATED CELLS; EMERGENT PROPERTY; ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNALS; MULTICELLULAR ORGANISMS; SELF REPAIR;

EID: 7444228482     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-39432-7_28     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Abelson H., Allen D., Coore D., Hanson C., Homsy G., Knight Jr. T., Nagpal R., Rauch E., Sussman G. J., Weiss R. (1999), "Amorphous Computing", MIT Tech. report, AI Memo 1665.
2. Astor J. C., and Adami C. (2000), "A Development Model for the Evolution of Artificial Neural Networks", Artificial Life, Vol. 6, pp. 189-218.
3. Bentley P., and Kumar S. (1999), "Three ways to grow designs: A comparison of embryogenies for an Evolutionary Design Problem", in Proceedings of the Congress on Evolutionary Computation, IEEE Press, pp. 35-43.
4. Boers, E. J. W., and Kuiper, H. (1992), "Biological metaphors and the design of modular neural networks", Masters thesis, Department of Computer Science and Department of Experimental and Theoretical Psychology, Leiden University.
5. Bongard J. C. and Pfeifer R. (2001), "Repeated Structure and Dissociation of Genotypic and Phenotypic Complexity in Artificial Ontogeny", in Spector L. et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the Genetic and Evol. Comput. Conference, Morgan-Kaufmann, pp. 829-836.
6. Cangelosi, A., Parisi, D., and Nolfi, S. (1993), "Cell Division and Migration in a 'Genotype' for Neural Networks", Tech. report PCIA-93, Inst. of Psych., CNR, Rome.
7. Dellaert, F. (1995), "Toward a Biologically Defensible Model of Development", Masters thesis, Dept. of Computer Eng. and Science, Case Western Reserve University.
8. Eggenberger P. (1997), "Evolving morphologies of simulated 3D organisms based on differential gene expression", Proc. Of European Conf. on Artificial Life, pp. 205-213.
9. Fleischer, K., and Barr, A. H. (1992), "A simulation testbed for the study of multicellular development: The multiple mechanisms of morphogenesis", in Langton C. G (ed.) Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Artificial Life, Addison-Wesley, pp. 389-416.
10. Furusawa C., and Kaneko, K. (1998), "Emergence of Multicellular Organisms with Dynamic Differentiation and Spatial Pattern", in Adami C. et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Artificial Life, MIT Press.
11. Gruau, F. (1994), "Neural Network Synthesis using Cellular Encoding and the Genetic Algorithm", PhD thesis, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon.
12. Gruau, F., Whitley, D., and Pyeatt, L. (1996) "A Comparison between Cellular Encoding and Direct Encoding for Genetic Neural Networks", in Proc. of the 1st Annual Conference on Genetic Programming, Stanford.
13. Hogeweg, P. (2000), "Evolving Mechanisms of Morphogenesis: on the Interplay between Differential Adhesion and Cell Differentiation", J. Theor. Biol., Vol. 203, pp. 317-333.
14. Hogeweg, P. (2000), "Shapes in the Shadow: Evolutionary Dynamics of Morphogenesis", Artificial Life, Vol. 6, pp. 85-101.
15. Hornby G. S., and Pollack J. B. (2001), "The Advantages of Generative Grammatical Encodings for Physical Design", in Proceedings of the Congress on Evolutionary Computation, IEEE Press, pp. 600-607.
16. Jacobi, N. (1995), "Harnessing Morphogenesis", Cognitive Science Research Paper 423, COGS, University of Sussex.
17. Kitano, H. (1990), "Designing neural networks using genetic algorithms with graph generation system", Complex Systems, Vol. 4, pp. 461-476.
18. Kodjabachian, J. and Meyer, J-A. (1998), "Evolution and Development of Neural Controllers for Locomotion, Gradient-Following and Obstacle-Avoidance in Artificial Insects", IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, Vol. 9, pp. 796-812.
19. Koza, J. R.: Genetic Programming: On the programming of computers by means of natural selection. MIT Press (1992), Genetic Programming II: Automatic Discovery of Reusable Subprograms. MIT Press (1994)
20. Lindenmeyer, A. (1968), "Mathematical models for cellular interaction in development, parts I and II", Journal of Theoretical Biology, Vol. 18, pp. 280-315.
21. Miller, J. F. and Thomson, P. (2000), "Cartesian genetic programming", in Proceedings of the 3rd European Conf. on Genetic Programming. LNCS, Vol. 1802, pp.121-132.
22. Nolfi, S., and Parisi, D. (1991) "Growing neural networks", Technical report PCIA-91-15, Institute of Psychology, CNR, Rome.
23. Siddiqi, A. A., and Lucas S. M. (1998), "A comparison of matrix rewriting versus direct encoding for evolving neural networks", in Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, IEEE Press, pp. 392-397.
24. Sims K. (1994), "Evolving 3D morphology and behaviour by competition", in Proceedings of Artificial Life IV, pp. 28-39.
25. Vassilev V. K., and Miller J. F. (2000), "The Advantages of Landscape Neutrality in Digital Circuit Evolution", 3rd Int. Conf. on Evolvable Systems: From Biology to Hardware, LNCS, Vol. 1801, Springer-Verlag, pp. 252-263.
26. Wolpert, L. (1998), "Principles of Development", Oxford University Press.
27. Yu, T. and Miller, J. (2001), "Neutrality and the evolvability of Boolean function landscape", in Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Genetic Programming, Springer-Verlag, pp. 204-217.