Engaging the public in the regulation of xenotransplantation: Would the Canadian model of public consultation be effective in the US?

Public Understanding of Science

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 417-428

  Allspaw, Kathleen M ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 7444226352     PISSN: 09636625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0963662504044559     Document Type: Review

References (11)

1. AAAS (1993) Benchmarks for Science Literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Bach, F. H. and Fineberg, H. V. (1998) "Call for Moratorium on Xenotransplants," Nature 391: 326.
3. Chapman, L. (1998) "The Draft U.S. Public Health Service Guideline on Infectious Disease Issues in Xenotransplantation," Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 862: 166-70.
4. CPHA (2001) Animal-to-human Transplantation: Should Canada Proceed? A Public Consultation on Xenotransplantation. Ottawa, Ontario: CPHA.
5. Dahl, R. A. (1956) A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6. Garland, M. (1999) "Experts and and Public: a Needed Partnership for Genetic Policy," Public Understanding of Science 8: 241-54.
7. Institute of Medicine (1996) Xenotransplantation: Science, Ethics and Public Policy. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
8. NIH (2002) "World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki, " (consulted September 2002): http://history.nih.gov/history/laws/helsinki.html/
9. Wadman, M. (1998) "FDA Turns Down Moratorium Demand on Xenotransplants," Nature 391: 423.
10. Winstanley, D., Lackey, R. T., Warnick, W. L. and Malanchuk, J. (1998) "Acid Rain: Science and Policy Making," Environmental Science and Policy 1: 51-7.
11. Wright, J. (2002) "Alternative Representations of the Same Data: Flaws in the Process of Consulting the Canadian Public about Xenotransplantation Issues," Canadian Medical Association Journal 167: 40-2.