GEANT Monte Carlo simulations for the GREAT spectrometer

Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment

Volumn 533, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 422-434

  Andreyev, A N ^a,e   Butler, P A ^a   Page, R D ^a   Appelbe, D E ^b   Jones, G D ^a   Joss, D T ^b   Herzberg, R D ^a   Regan, P H ^c   Simpson, J ^b   Wadsworth, R ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b DARESBURY LABORATORY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^e TRIUMF   (Canada)

Author keywords

Clover ge detector; Decay tagging spectrometer; Planar ge strip detector; Si pin diode; Si strip detector

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA REDUCTION; GAMMA RAYS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; PARTICLE DETECTORS; PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARDS; PROTONS;

DECAY TAGGING SPECTROMETERS; ENERGY LOSS SIGNALS; PIXELS; RESIDUAL ENERGY;

SPECTROMETERS;

EID: 7444220646     PISSN: 01689002     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2004.07.205     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. R.D. Page, et al., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B 204 (2003) 634.
2. The GREAT project is a collaboration between the Nuclear Physics Group at Daresbury Laboratory, and the nuclear physics groups at the University of Liverpool, Manchester University, the University of Surrey, York University and Keele University within the United Kingdom and JYFL, Finland; http://npg.dl.ac.uk/GREAT/.
3. M. Leino, et al., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B 99 (1995) 653.
4. M. Leino, et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 6 (1999) 63.
5. J. Uusitalo, et al., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B 204 (2003) 639.
6. P.A. Butler, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) 202501.
7. P.A. Butler, et al., Acta Phys. Polonica B 34 (2003) 2071.
8. Geant Detector Simulation Tool, CERN, 1993; http://wwwinfo.cern.ch/asd/geant.
9. A.N. Andreyev, et al., a paper on the GREAT SHIP, Nucl. Instr. and Meth., this issue.
10. C. Davids, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B 204 (2003) 124.
11. M. Leino, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B 204 (2003) 129.
12. H. Kettunen, et al., Acta Phys. Pol. B 32 (2001) 989.
13. R.G. Allatt, et al., Phys. Lett. B 437 (1998) 29.
14. M. Amman, P.N. Luke, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A 452 (2000) 155.
15. G. Duchêne, et al., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A 432 (1999) 90.
16. S.L. Shepherd, et al., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A 434 (1999) 373.
17. I.H. Lazarus, et al., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS-48 (2001) 567.
18. D. E. Appelbe et al., in preparation.
19. F.P. Heßberger, et al., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A 274 (1989) 522.
20. A.N. Andreyev, et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 6 (1999) 381.
21. K. Van de Vel, et al., Phys. Rev. C 68 (2003) 054311.
22. A.N. Andreyev, et al., Nature (London) 405 (2000) 430.
23. K. Van de Vel, et al., Phys. Rev. C 65 (2002) 064301.
24. G.D. Jones, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A 488 (2002) 471.
25. A. Damkjaer, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 200 (1982) 377.
26. T. Tabata, R. Ito, S. Okabe, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 94 (1971) 509.
27. A. Ghiorso, et al., Phys. Rev. C 7 (1973) 2032.
28. The program to calculate conversion coefficients. The National Nuclear Data Center (NNDC), http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/nndc/physco/.
29. E.S. Paul, et al., Phys. Rev. C 51 (1995) 78.