Defining execution viewpoints for a large and complex software-intensive system

2009 Joint Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture and European Conference on Software Architecture, WICSA/ECSA 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1-10

  Arias, Trosky B Callo ^a   America, Pierre ^b   Avgeriou, Paris ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b EMBEDDED SYSTEMS INSTITUTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPLEX SOFTWARE; COMPLEX SYSTEMS; HEALTHCARE DOMAINS; RUNTIMES; SOFTWARE INTENSIVE SYSTEMS; SOFTWARE SYSTEMS;

ARCHITECTURE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE;

SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE;

EID: 74349127365     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/WICSA.2009.5290784     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Philips Healthcare - Magnetic Resonance Imaging, http://www.healthcare. philips.com/main/products/mri/index.wpd, 2009, Visited February 2009.
2. T. B. Callo Arias, P. Avgeriou, and P. America, Analyzing the Actual Execution of a Large Software- Intensive System for Determining Dependencies, presented at 15th Working Conference on Reverse Engineering, 2008.
3. P. Clements, F. Bachmann, L. Bass, D. Garlan, J. Ivers, R. Little, R. Nord, and J. Stafford, Documenting Software Architectures. Views and Beyond: Addison Wesley, 2002.
4. C. Hofmeister, P. Kruchten, R. L. Nord, H. Obbink, A. Ran, and P. America, A general model of software architecture design derived from five industrial approaches, Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 80, pp. 106-126, 2007.
5. C. Hofmeister, R. Nord, and D. Soni, Applied Software Architecture. Boston: Addison-Wesley, 1999.
6. R. Hopkins and K. Jenkins, Eating the IT Elephant: Moving from Greenfield Development to Brownfield: IBM Press, 2008.
7. G. Hunt, M. Aiken, P. Barham, M. Fähndrich, C. Hawblitzel, O. Hodson, J. Larus, S. Levi, N. Murphy, B. Steensgaard, D. Tarditi, T. Wobber, and B. Zill, Sealing OS processes to improve dependability and safety, presented at 2nd ACM SIGOPS/EuroSys European Conference on Computer Systems, 2007.
8. ISO/IEC-JTC1/SC7, ISO/IEC 42010 Systems and Software Engineering - Recommended Practice for Architectural Description of Software-Intensive Systems 2007.
9. H. Koning and H. van Vliet, A method for defining IEEE Std 1471 viewpoints, The Journal of Systems & Software, vol. 79, pp. 120-131, 2006.
10. P. Kruchten, The 4+1 View Model of Architecture, IEEE Software, vol. 12, pp. 42-50, 1995.
11. G. Muller, CAFCR: A Multi-view Method for Embedded Systems Architecting; Balancing Genericity and Specificity, PhD Thesis, Technical University Delft, The Netherlands, 2004.
12. G. Muller, Gaudí System Architecting - A Reference Architecture Primer, http://www.gaudisite.nl/info/ReferenceArchitecturePrimer.info.html, 2007, Visited April 2009.
13. H. Obbink, P. Kruchten, W. Kozaczynski, R. Hilliard, A. Ran, H. Postema, D. Lutz, R. Kazman, W. Tracz, and E. Kahane, Report on Software Architecture Review and Assessment version1.0, http://philippe.kruchten.com/architecture/ SARAv1.pdf, Visited November 2008.
14. N. Rozanski and E. Woods, Software Systems Architecture: working with stakeholders using viewpoints and perspectives: Addison Wesley 2005.
15. H. Sozer and B. Tekinerdogan, Introducing Recovery Style for Modeling and Analyzing System Recovery, presented at 7th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture, 2008.
16. P. van de Laar, P. America, J. Rutgers, S. van Loo, G. Muller, T. Punter, and D. Watts, The Darwin Project: Evolvability of Software-Intensive Systems, presented at 3rd International IEEE Workshop on Software Evolvability 2007.
17. A. van Deursen, C. Hofmeister, R. Koschke, L. Moonen, and C. Riva, Symphony: View-Driven Software Architecture Reconstruction, presented at 4th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture, 2004.