When Russians learn English: How the semantics of causation may change

Bilingualism

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 153-176

  Wolff, Phillip ^a   Ventura, Tatyana ^b  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 74349123172     PISSN: 13667289     EISSN: 14691841     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1366728909004040     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Alberini, C. M. (2005). Mechanisms of memory stabilization: Are consolidation and reconsolidation similar or distinct processes? TRENDS in Neuroscience, 28, 51-56.
2. Altenberg, E. P. (1991). Assessing first language vulnerability to attrition. In Seliger & Vago (eds.), pp. 189-206.
3. Athanasopoulos, P. (2001). L2 acquisition and bilingual conceptual structure. M.A. thesis, University of Essex.
4. Baron, N. S. (1977). Language acquisition and historical change. New York: North-Holland.
5. Ben-Rafael, M. (2004). Language contact and attrition: The spoken French of Israeli Francophones. In Schmid et al. (eds.), pp. 165-188.
6. Boroditsky, L., Ham, W. & Ramscar, M. (2002). What is universal about event perception? Comparing English and Indonesian speakers. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 168-173. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Bowerman, M. (1982). Reorganizational processes in lexical and syntactic development. In E.Wanner & L. Gleitman (eds.), Language acquisition: The state of the art, pp. 319-346. New York: Cambridge University Press.
8. Bowerman, M. (1996). The origins of children's spatial semantic categories: Cognitive versus linguistic determinants. In J. J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson (eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity, pp. 145-175. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Cohen, L. B., Amsel, G., Redford, M. A. & Casasola, M. (1998). The development of infant causal perception. In A. Slater (ed.), Perceptual development: Visual, auditory, and speech perception in infancy, pp. 167-209. East Sussex: Psychology Press Ltd.
10. Cole, P. (1983). The grammatical role of the causee in Universal Grammar. International Journal of American Linguistics, 49, 115-133.
11. Comrie, B. (1981). Language universals and linguistic typology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
12. Comrie, B. (1985). Causative verb formation and other verbderiving morphology. In T. Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description (vol. 3): Grammatical categories and the lexicon, pp. 309-348. New York: Cambridge University Press.
13. Cook, V. J. (2003). Introduction: The changing L1 in the L2 user's mind. In Cook (ed.), pp. 1-18.
14. Cook, V. J. (ed.) (2003a). Effects of the second language on the first. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
15. Croft, W. A. (1991). Syntactic categories and grammatical relations, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
16. Cruse, D. A. (1972). A note on English causatives. Linguistic Inquiry, 3, 522-528.
17. Debiec, J., Doỳere, V., Nader, K. & LeDoux, J. E. (2006). PNAS, 103, 3428-3433.
18. Dowty, D. R. (1979). Word meaning and Montague grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.
19. Fodor, J. A. (1970). Three reasons for not deriving "kill" from "cause to die". Linguistic Inquiry, 1, 429-438.
20. Forcato, C., Burgos, V. L., Argibay, P. F., Molina, V. A., Pedreira, M. E. & Maldonado, H. (2007). Reconsolidation of declarative memory in humans. Learning and Memory, 14, 295-303.
21. Francis, W. S. (2005). Bilingual semantic and conceptual representation. In Kroll & De Groot (eds.), pp. 251-267.
22. Gentner, D. (1975). Evidence for the psychological reality of semantic components: The verbs of possession. In Norman et al. (eds.), pp. 211-246.
23. Goldberg, A. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24. Grosjean, F. (2001). The bilingual's language modes. In J. L. Nicol (ed.), One mind, two languages: Bilingual language processing, pp. 1-22. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
25. Guilfoyle, E. (2000). Tense and N-features in Modern Irish. In A. Carnie & E. Guilfoyle (eds.), The syntax of verb initial languages, pp. 61-74. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. Ǵúrel, A. (2004). Attrition in L1 competence: The case of Turkish. In Schmid et al. (eds.), pp. 207-221.
27. Hawkins, J. A. (1985). A comparative typology of English and German: Unifying the contrast. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
28. Helms-Park, R. (2001). Evidence of lexical transfer in learning syntax. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 71-102.
29. Hohenstain, J., Eisenberg, A.&Naigles, L. (2006). Is he floating across or crossing afloat? Cross-influence of L1 and L2 in Spanish-English bilingual adults. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9, 249-261.
30. Hutz, M. (2004). Is there a natural process of decay? A longitudinal study of language attrition. In Schmid et al. (eds.), pp. 189-206.
31. Isurin, L. (2000). "Deserted island" or a child's first language loss. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3, 151-166.
32. Jackendoff, R. (1990). Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.
34. Katzner, K. (1994). English-Russian, Russian-English dictionary. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
35. K̈opke, B. (2004). Attrition is not a unitary phenomenon: On different possible outcomes of language contact situations. In A. M. L. Suarez, F. Ramallo & X-P. Rodiguez-Yanez (eds.), Bilingual socialization and bilingual language acquisition: Proceedings from the Second International Symposium on Bilingualism, pp. 1331-1347. Vigo: Servizo De Publicacions da Universitdade De Vigo.
36. K̈opke, B. (2007). Language attrition at the crossroads of brain, mind, and society. In K̈opke et al. (eds.), pp. 9-37.
37. K̈opke, B. & Schmid, M. S. (2004). Language attrition: The next phase. In M. S. Schmid, B. K̈opke, M. Keijzer & L. Weilemar (eds.), First language attrition: Interdisciplinary perspective on methodological issues. pp. 1-43. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
38. K̈opke, B., Schmid, M. S., Keijzer, M. & Dostert, S. (eds.) (2007). Language attrition: Theoretical perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
39. Kozinsky, I. & Polinsky, M. (1993). Causee and patient in the causative of transitive: Coding conflict or doubling of grammatical relations? In B. Comrie & M. Polinsky (eds.), Causatives and transitivity, pp. 177-240. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
40. Kroll, J. F. & A. M. B. De Groot (eds.) (2005). Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41. Kroll, J. F. & Stewart, E. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 149-174.
42. Kroll, J. F. & Tokowicz, N. (2005). Models of representation and processing. In Kroll & De Groot (eds.), pp. 531-553.
43. Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.
44. Laufer, B. (2003). The influence of L2 on L1 collocational knowledge and on L1 lexical diversity in free written expression. In Cook (ed.), pp. 19-31.
45. Levin, B. & Rapoport, T. R. (1988). Lexical subordination. Proceedings of the 24th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, pp. 275-289. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistics Society.
46. Levin, B.&RappaportHovav, M. (1994).Apreliminary analysis of causative verbs in English. Lingua, 92, 35-77.
47. Levin, B.&RappaportHovav, M. (1995). Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
48. Levin, B. & Rappaport Hovav, M. (2005) Argument realization (Research Surveys in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49. Levinson, S. C. (1997). From outer to inner space: Linguistic categories and non-linguistic thinking. In E. Pederson & J. Nuyts (eds.), With language in mind: The relationship between linguistic and conceptual representation, pp. 13-45. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50. Marian, V.&Kaushanskaya, M. (2007). Cross-linguistic transfer and borrowing in bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 369-390.
51. Miller, G. A. & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1976). Language and perception. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
52. Montrul, S. (2004). Subject and object expression in Spanish heritage speakers: A case of morpho-syntactic convergence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 125-142.
53. Nader, K., Schafe, G. E. & LeDoux, J. E. (2000). The labile nature of consolidation theory. Nature Reviews, 1, 216-219.
54. Norman, D. A., Rumelhart, D. E. & the LNR Research Group (eds.) (1975). Explorations in cognition. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.
55. Otheguy, R. & Garcia, O. (1988). Diffusion of lexical innovations in the Spanish of Cuban Americans. In J. L. Ornstein-Galicia, G. K. Green & D. Bixler-Marquez (eds.), Research issues and problems in U.S. Spanish: Latin American and Southwestern varieties, pp. 203-243. Brownsville, TX: University of Texas.
56. Pavlenko, A. (1999). New approaches to concepts in bilingual memory. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 2, 209-230.
57. Pavlenko, A. (2002). Bilingualism and emotions. Multilingua, 21, 45-78.
58. Pavlenko, A. (2003). "I feel clumsy speaking Russian": L2 influence on L1 in narratives of Russian L2 users of English. In Cook (ed.), pp. 32-61.
59. Pavlenko, A. (2004). L2 influence and L1 attrition in adult bilingualism. In Schmid et al. (eds.), pp. 47-60.
60. Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
61. Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct. New York: William Morrow & Co.
62. Pustejovsky, J. (1991). The syntax of event structure. Cognition, 41, 47-81.
63. Radford, A. (1988). Transformational grammar: A first course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
64. Schank, R. C. (1972). Conceptual dependency: A theory of natural language understanding. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 532-631.
65. Schmid, M. S. (2007). The role of L1 use for L1 attrition. In K̈opke et al. (eds.), pp. 135-153.
66. Schmid, M. S. & K̈opke, B. (2007). Bilingualism and attrition. In K̈opke et al. (eds.), pp. 1-7.
67. Schmid, M. S., K̈opke, B., Keijzer, M. & Weilemar, L. (eds.) (2004). First language attrition: Interdisciplinary perspectives on methodological issues. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
68. Seliger, H. W. & Vago, R. M. (eds.) (1991). First language attrition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
69. Shibatani, M. (1976). The grammar of causative constructions: A conspectus. In M. Shibatani (ed.), The grammar of causative constructions (Syntax and Semantics 6), pp. 1-40. New York: Academic Press.
70. Smith, R. E. & Hunt, R. R. (2000). The influence of distinctive processing on retrieval-induced forgetting. Memory & Cognition, 28, 503-508.
71. Song, G. & Wolff, P. (2005). Linking perceptual properties to the linguistic expression of causation. In M. Achard & S. Kemmer (eds.), Language, culture, and mind, pp. 237-250. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
72. Sorace, A. (2005). Selective optionality in language development. In L. Cornips & K. P. Corrigan (eds.), Syntax and variation: Reconciling the biological and the social, pp. 55-80. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
73. Talmy, L. (1988). Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science, 12, 49-100.
74. Thompson, I. (1977). Russian word order: A comparative study. The Slavic and East European Journal, 21, 88-103.
75. Tsimpli, I., Sorace, A., Heycock, C. & Filiaci, F. (2004). First language attrition and syntactic subjects: A study of Greek and Italian near-native speakers of English. International Journal of Bilingualism, 3, 257-278.
76. Van Valin, R. (1990). Semantic parameters on split intransitivity. Language, 66, 221-260.
77. Walker, M. P., Brakefield, T., Hobson, J. A. & Stickgold, R. (2003).Dissociable stages of humanmemory consolidation and reconsolidation. Nature, 425, 616-620.
78. Wheeler, M., Falla, P. S. & Unbegaun, B. (eds.). (1995). Oxford Russian dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
79. Whorf, B. (1991/1950/1941). An American Indian model of the universe. In J. Carroll (ed.), Language, thought and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf, pp. 57-64. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
80. Wierzbicka, A. (1988). The semantics of grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
81. Wolff, P. (2003). Direct causation in the linguistic coding and individuation of causal events. Cognition, 88, 1-48.
82. Wolff, P. (2007). Representing causation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 82-111.
83. Wolff, P.&Song, G. (2003).Models of causation and the semantics of causal verbs. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 376-1332
84. Wolff, P., Song, G. & Driscoll, D. (2002). Models of causation and causal verbs. In Papers from the 37 the Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, Main Session (vol. 1), pp. 607-622. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistics Society.
85. Wolff, P., Klettke, B., Ventura, T. & Song, G. (2005). Categories of causation across cultures. In W. Ahn, R. L., Goldstone, B. C., Love, A. B., Markman & P. Wolff (eds.), Categorization inside and outside of the lab: Festschrift in honor of Douglas L. Medin, pp. 29-48. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
86. Wolff, P. & Zettergren, M. (2002). A vector model of causal meaning. In Proceedings of the Twenty-fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 976-981. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.