Rule-based versus principle-based regulatory compliance

Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

Volumn 205, Issue , 2009, Pages 37-46

  Burgemeestre, Brigitte ^a   Hulstijn, Joris ^a   Tan, Yao Hua ^a,b  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Compliance; Formal reasoning; Principle based; Rule based

Indexed keywords

INTERNATIONAL TRADE;

COMPLIANCE; EU REGULATIONS; FORMAL REASONING; PRINCIPLE-BASED; REGULATORY SYSTEMS; RULE BASED; SAFETY AND SECURITIES; SELF-ASSESSMENT;

REGULATORY COMPLIANCE;

EID: 74349096439     PISSN: 09226389     EISSN: 18798314     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-082-7-37     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. G. Antoniou, D. Billington, G. Governatori, and M. J. Maher. Representation results for defeasible logic. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic, 2(2):255-287, 2001.
2. S. Arjoon. Striking a balance between rules and principles-based approaches for effective governance: A risks-based approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 68:53-82, 2006.
3. K. Atkinson, T. Bench-Capon, and P. McBurney. Computational representation of practical argument. Synthese, 152(2):157-206, 2006.
4. I. Ayres and J. Braithwaite. Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate. Oxford University press, 1992.
5. B. Burgemeestre, J. Liu, J. Hulstijn, and Y.-H. Tan. Early requirements engineering for e-customs decision support: Assessing overlap in mental models. In E. Yu, J. Eder, and C. Rolland, editors, Proceedings of the Forum at the CAiSE Conference, pages 31-36, 2009.
6. CBP. Securing the global supply chain: Customs-trade partnership against terrorism (c-tpat) strategic plan. Technical report, United States Customs and Border Protection (CPB), 2004.
7. CBP. Minimum-security criteria for c-tpat foreign manufacturers in english. Technical report, United States Customs and Border Protection (CPB), 2008.
8. L. A. Cunningham. A prescription to retire the rhetoric of principles-based systems in corporate law, securities regulation and accounting. Technical Report 127, Boston College Law School, 2007.
9. S. A. DiPiazza, T. Flynn, D. McDonnell, J. H. Quigley, F. Samyn, and J. S. Turley. Principles-based accounting standards. In Global Public Policy Symposium, 2008.
10. R. Dworkin. Taking Rights Seriously. Duckworth, London, 1977.
11. European Commission. The AEO Compact model. Technical Report TAXUD/2006/1452, Directorate-General Taxation and Customs Union, 2006.
12. European Commission. Commission Regulation no 1875/2006 of 18 december 2006. Official Journal of the European Union, 360:64-125, 2006.
13. European Commission. AEO guidelines. Technical Report TAXUD/2006/1450, Directorate-General Taxation and Customs Union, 2007.
14. C. L. Ford. New governance, compliance, and principles-based securities regulation. American Business Law Journal, 45(1):1-60, 2008.
15. L. Kaplow. General characteristics of rules. In Bouckaert and DeGeest, editors, Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, volume 502. Edward Elgar, 2000.
16. R. B. Korobkin. Behavioral analysis and legal form: Rules vs. principles revisited. Oregon Law Review, 79(1):23-60, 2000.
17. R. Lu, S. Sadiq, and G. Governatori. Measurement of compliance distance in business work practice. Information Systems Management, 25(4):344-355, 2009.
18. M. W. Nelson. Behavioral evidence on the effects of principles- and rules-based standards. Accounting Review, 17(1):91-104, 2003.
19. S. W. Sadiq, G. Governatori, and K. Namiri. Modeling control objectives for business process compliance. In G. Alonso, P. Dadam, and M. Rosemann, editors, Business Process Management (BPM 2007), volume LNCS 4714, pages 149-164. Springer, 2007.
20. D. Satava, C. Caldwell, and L. Richards. Ethics and the auditing culture: Rethinking the foundation of accounting and auditing. Journal of Business Ethics, 64:271284, 2006.
21. B. Verheij, J. Hage, and H. van den Herik. An integrated view on rules and principles. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 6:3-26, 1998.