Quality of Diabetes Care at a Student-Run

Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 969-981

  Clinic, Free ^a   Ryskina, Kira L ^a   Meah, Yasmin S ^a   Thomas, David C ^a  

^a MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Diabetes; Medical students; Quality of care; Student run health clinic; Uninsured

Indexed keywords

GLYCOSYLATED HEMOGLOBIN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; MALE; MANPOWER; MEDICAL STUDENT; MIDDLE AGED; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT; PATIENT; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; AGED; AMBULATORY CARE FACILITIES; BLOOD PRESSURE; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 1; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; FEMALE; HEMOGLOBIN A, GLYCOSYLATED; HUMANS; MALE; MEDICALLY UNINSURED; MIDDLE AGED; NEW YORK CITY; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; STUDENTS, MEDICAL;

EID: 74349092162     PISSN: 10492089     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/hpu.0.0231     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Wilper AP, Woodhandler S, Lasser KE, et al. A national study of chronic disease prevalence and access to care in uninsured U.S. adults. Ann Intern Med. 2008 Aug 5;149(3):170-6.
2. Simpson SA, Long JA. Medical student-run health clinics: important contributors to patient care and medical education. J Gen Intern Med. 2007 March;22(3):352-6.
3. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2006 Jan;29(Suppl 1):S4-42.
4. United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKDPS 33). Lancet. 1998 Sep 12;352(9131):837-53.
5. United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Tight blood pressure control and risk of microvascular and macrovascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. BMJ. 1998 Sep;317(7160):703-13.
6. Irons BK, Flemming B, Seifert CF, et al. Evaluation of diabetes primary care and effects on health care charges in elderly patients with diabetes. Am J Med Sci. 2008 Jun;335(6):426-30.
7. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993 Sep 30;329(14):977-86.
8. ADVANCE Collaborative Group, Patel A, MacMahon S, et al. Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008 Jun 12;358(24):2560-72.
9. Holman RR, Paul SK, Bethel MA, et al. 10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 9;359(15):1577-89.
10. Vijan S, Hofer TP, Hayward RA. Estimated benefits of glycemic control in microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes. Ann Intern Med. 1997 Nov 1;127(9):788-95.
11. Stroebel RJ, Gloor B, Freytag S, et al. Adapting the chronic care model to treat chronic illness at a free medical clinic. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2005 May; 16(2):286-96.
12. Benoit SR, Fleming R, Philis-Tsimikas A, et al. Predictors of glycemic control among patients with Type 2 diabetes: a longitudinal study. BMC Public Health. 2005 Apr 17; 5-36.
13. Saaddine JB, Engelgau MM, Beckles GL, et al. A diabetes report card for the United States: quality of care in the 1990s. Ann Intern Med. 2002 Apr 16;136(8):565-74.
14. Nelson KM, Chapko MK, Reiber G, et al. The association between health insurance coverage and diabetes care; data from the 2000 behavioral risk factor surveillance system. Health Serv Res. 2005 Apr;40(2):361-72.
15. Ayanian JZ, Weissman JS, Schneider EC, et al. Unmet health needs of uninsured adults in the United States. JAMA. 2000 Oct 25;284(16):2061-9.
16. Haffner SM, Hazuda HP, Stern MP, et al. Effects of socioeconomic status on hyperglycemia and retinopathy levels in Mexican Americans with NIDDM. Diabetes Care. 1989 Feb;12(2):128-34.
17. Eberhardt MS, Lackland DT, Wheeler FC, et al. Is race related to glycemic control? An assessment of glycosylated hemoglobin in two South Carolina communities. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994 Oct;47(10):1181-9.
18. Blaum CS, Velez L, Hiss RG, et al. Characteristics related to poor glycemic control in NIDDM patients in community practice. Diabetes Care. 1997 Jan;20(1):7-11.
19. Harris MI, Eastman RC, Cowie CC, et al. Racial and ethnic differences in glycemic control of adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1999 Mar;22(3):403-8.
20. Poulsen EJ. Student-run clinics: a double opportunity. JAMA. 1995;273:430.
21. Geller S, Taylor FM, Scott HD. Free clinics helping to patch the safety net. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2004:15(1);42-51.
22. Buchanan D, Witlen R. Balancing service and education: ethical management of student-run clinics. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2006;17:477-85.
23. New York City Department of City Planning. 2000 census profiles for New York City. New York: New York City Department of City Planning, 2002. Available at: http:// gis.nyc.gov/dcp/pa/Map?mapaction=SINGLE&layer=nycd&stats= General&sx=0& sy=464&boro = 1&dir=&event=NEW- STATS&entry= 5&sltdMBuffer=.
24. New York City Department of City Planning. Community district profile for East Harlem. New York: New York City Department of City Planning, 2007. Available at http://www.nyc.gov/html/dcp/pdf/lucds/mn11profile.pdf.
25. Olson EC, Van Wye G, Kerker B, et al. Take care East Harlem. NYC community health profiles, 2nd ed. New York: New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, 2006; 21(42):1-16. Available at: http://www.nyc.gov/html/ doh/ downloads/ pdf/data/2006chp-303.pdf.
26. National Committee for Quality Assurance. HEDIS 2006: health plan employer data & information set, Vol. 2, technical specifications. Washington, DC: National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA), 2005.
27. National Diabetes Quality Improvement Alliance. National diabetes quality improvement alliance performance measurement set for adult diabetes. Chicago, IL: National Diabetes Quality Improvement Alliance, 2003.
28. HealthPartners. 2005 clinical indicators report: 2004/2005 results. Bloomington, MN: HealthPartners, 2005. Available at: http://www.healthpartners. com/files/28455.pdf.
29. Porterfield DS, Kinsinger L. Quality of care for uninsured patients with diabetes in a rural area. Diabetes Care. 2002 Feb;25:319-23.
30. New York State Department of Health. New York State strategic plan for the prevention and control of diabetes. Albany, NY: New York State Department of Health, 2006. Available at : www.health.state.ny.us/diseases/conditions/ diabetes/strategicplan .htm.
31. Huang ES, Zhang Q, Brown SE, et al. The cost-effectiveness of improving diabetes care in US federally qualified community health centers. Health Serv Res. 2007 Dec; 42(6 Pt 1):2174-2323.
32. Shetty S, Secnik K, Oglesby AK. Relationship of glycemic control to total diabetes-related costs for managed care health plan members with type 2 diabetes. J Manag Care Pharm. 2005 Sep;11(7):559-64.
33. Selby JV, Ray GT, Zhang D, et al. Excess costs of medical care for patients with diabetes in a managed care population. Diabetes Care. 1997 Sep;20(9):1396-402.
34. National Committee for Quality Assurance. The state of health care quality. Wasington, DC: National Committee for Quality Assurance, 2007. Available at: http://web.ncqa.org/Portals/0/Publications/Resource%20Library/ SOHC/SOHC-07.pdf.
35. Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HA, et al. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. BMJ. 2000 Aug;321:405-12.
36. Holman RR, Paul SK, Bethel MA, et al. Long-term follow-up after tight control of blood pressure in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct;359:1565-76.
37. Curb JD, Pressel SL, Cutler IA, et al. Effect of diuretic-based antihypertensive treatment on cardiovascular disease risk in older diabetic patients with isolated systolic hypertension. Systolic hypertention in the elderly program cooperative research group. JAMA. 1996 Dec 18;276:1886-92.
38. United Kingdom prospective diabetes study group. Cost effectiveness analysis of improved blood pressure control in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 40. BMJ. 1998 Sep 12;317:720-6.
39. CDC Diabetes Cost-effectiveness Group. Cost-effectiveness of intensive glycemic control, intensified hypertension control, and serum cholesterol level reduction for type 2 diabetes. JAMA. 2002 May 15;287(19):2542-51.
40. Vijan S, Hayward RA. Treatment of hypertension in type 2 diabetes mellitus: blood pressure goals, choice of agents, and setting priorities in diabetes care. Ann of Internal Med. 2003 Apr 1;138:593-602.
41. Stephens JM, Botteman MF, Hay JW. Economic impact of antidiabetic medications and glycemic control on managed care organizations: a review of literature. J Manag Care Pharm. 2006 Mar;12(2):130-42. Available at: http://www.amcp.org/data/jmcp/subj-review-130-142.pdf.
42. New York State Department of Health. 2006 New York State managed care plan performance: a report on quality, access to care, and consumer satisfaction. Albany, NY: New York State Department of Health, 2006. Available at: http://www.health.state.ny.us/health-care/managed-care/qarrfull/qarr-2006/ qarr2006.pdf.
43. New York State Department of Health. The state of diabetes in New York State: a surveillance report. Albany, NY: New York State Department of Health, 2005. Available at: http://www.health.state.ny.us/statistics/diseases/ conditions/diabetes/docs/1997-2004-surveillance-report.pdf.