Evolutionary architecting of embedded automotive product lines: An industrial case study

2009 Joint Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture and European Conference on Software Architecture, WICSA/ECSA 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 101-110

  Axelsson, Jakob ^a,b  

^a MÄLARDALEN UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b VOLVO CAR CORPORATION   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMOTIVE PRODUCTS; EVOLUTIONARY PROCESS; INDUSTRIAL CASE STUDY; NEW PRODUCT; PRODUCT-LINES; QUALITY ATTRIBUTES; TECHNICAL ASPECTS;

ARCHITECTURE; AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY; COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION; EMBEDDED SOFTWARE; EMBEDDED SYSTEMS; VEHICLES;

SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE;

EID: 74349088291     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/WICSA.2009.5290796     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. M. Aoyama. Metrics and analysis of software architecture evolution with discontinuity. In Proc. of the International Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution, pp. 103-107, Orlando, Florida, 2002.
2. st Intl. Conf. on Software Eng., pp. 544-554, Los Angeles, 1999.
3. J. Bosch and P. Molin. Software architecture design: evaluation and transformation. In Proc. IEEE Conf. on Eng. of Computer-Based Systems, pp. 4-10, March 1999.
4. M. Broy, I. Krüger, A. Pretschner, and C. Salzmann. Engineering automotive software. In Proc. IEEE, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 356-373, Feb. 2007.
5. C. Del Rosso. Continuous evolution through software architecture evaluation: a case study. J. of Software Maintenance: Research and Practice, vol. 18, pp. 351-383, 2006.
6. B. Florentz and M. Huhn. Architecture potential analysis: a closer look inside architecture evaluation. J. of Software, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 43-56, Oct.. 2007.
7. IEEE 1471-2000, Recommended Practice for Architectural Description of Software-Intensive Systems. 2000.
8. M. Inoki and Y. Fukazawa. Software product line evolution method based on kaizen approach. In Proc. of the ACM symposium on Applied computing, pp. 1207-1214, Seoul, Korea, 2007.
9. th IEEE/IFIP Working Conference on Software Architecture, pp. 109-119, 2005.
10. R. Kazman, M. Klein, and P. Clements. ATAM: Method for architecture evaluation. Technical Report CMU/SEI-2000-TR-004, Software Engineering Institute, 2000.
11. th Intl. Workshop on Software Evolution, pp. 59-66, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 2007.
12. G. Leen and D. Heffernan. Expanding automotive electronic system. IEEE Computer, vol. 35, pp. 88-93, 2002.
13. th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 585-592, Orlando, Florida, May 2002.
14. D. Selin, H. Svensson, P. Sundsten, A. Wikström, and U. Eklund. A reference architecture for infotainment systems. SAE Paper No. 2006-21-0013, 2006.
15. M. Svahnberg and J. Bosch. Evolution in software product lines: two cases. J. of Software Maintenance: Research and Practice, vol. 11, pp. 391-422, 1999.
16. M. Svahnberg and J. Bosch. Issues concerning variability in software product lines. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1951, pp. 146-157, Springer Verlag 2000.
17. th IEEE Intl. Conf. on Eng. of Computer Based Systems, pp. 87-95, Belfast, 2008.
18. rd ed. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, 2003.