Audits of postoperative analgesia: What have we learned and what should we do now?

Paediatric Anaesthesia

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 117-118

  Howard, Richard F ^a  

^a GREAT ORMOND STREET HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

OPIATE;

CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; EDITORIAL; EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA; FOLLOW UP; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; MEDICAL AUDIT; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; NAUSEA AND VOMITING; NERVE BLOCK; NERVE INJURY; PATIENT SAFETY; POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REGIONAL ANESTHESIA; RESPIRATION DEPRESSION; RISK FACTOR;

ANALGESIA; ANALGESICS, OPIOID; CHILD; DRUG UTILIZATION; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; IRELAND; MEDICAL AUDIT; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 74349084458     PISSN: 11555645     EISSN: 14609592     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2009.03253.x     Document Type: Editorial

References (5)

1. Morton N, Errera A. APA national audit of pediatric opioid infusions. Pediatr Anesth 2010 20 : 119 125.
2. Llewellyn N, Moriarty A. The national pediatric epidural audit. Pediatr Anesth 2007 17 : 520 533.
3. Cook TM, Counsell D, Wildsmith JA. Major complications of central neuraxial block: report on the Third National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists. Br J Anaesth 2009 102 : 179 190.
4. Department of Transport 2008. Road Casualties Great Britain-2007. Available at: http://www.dft.gov.uk/. Accessed 20 December, 2009.
5. The Patient Safety First Campaign 2009. Available at: http://www.patientsafetyfirst.nhs.uk. Accessed 20 December, 2009.