Anterior and posterior lumbar interbody fusion with percutaneous pedicle screws: Comparison to muscle damage and minimally invasive techniques

Spine

Volumn 34, Issue 25, 2009, Pages

  Dickerman, Rob D ^a,b,c   East, John W ^a   Winters, Karl ^a   Tackett, Jennifer ^a   Hajovsky Pietla, Annette ^a  

^a Neurosurgery Research Foundation of Texas   (United States)

^b North Texas Neurosurgical Associates   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Creatine phosphokinase; Lumbar fusion; Minimally invasive; Percutaneous pedicle screws

Indexed keywords

CREATINE KINASE;

ADULT; AGED; ANTERIOR SPINE FUSION; ARTICLE; CREATINE KINASE BLOOD LEVEL; DISCOGENIC PAIN; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE PROCEDURE; MUSCLE INJURY; PEDICLE SCREW; POSTERIOR SPINE FUSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADICULOPATHY; SPINE FUSION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

ADULT; AGED; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; BONE SCREWS; CREATINE KINASE; FEMALE; HUMANS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINAL FUSION; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE;

EID: 74249118437     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181af0523     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Lee SH, Choi WG, Lim SR, et al. Minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion followed by percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for isthmic spondylolisthesis. Spine J 2004;4:644-649
2. Rahman M, Summers LE, Richter B, et al. Comparison of techniques for decompressive lumbar laminectomy: the minimally invasive versus the "classic" open approach. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2008;51:100-105
3. Powers CJ, Isaacs RE. Minimally invasive fusion and fixation techniques. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2006;17:477-489
4. Arts MP, Nieborg A, Brand R, et al. Serum creatine phosphokinase as an indicator of muscle injury after various spinal and nonspinal surgical procedures. J Neurosurg Spine 2007;7:282-286
5. Kumbhare D, Parkinson W, Dunlop B. Validity of serum creatine kinase as a measure of muscle injury produced by lumbar surgery. J Spinal Disord Tech 2008;21:49-54.
6. Dickerman RD, Reynolds AS, Tackett J, et al. Percutaneous pedicle screws significantly decrease muscle damage and operative time: surgical technique makes a difference. Eur Spine J 2008;17:1398-1399
7. Dickerman RD, Guyer R, Hisey M. Automated intraoperative EMG testing during percutaneous pedicle screw placement. Spine J 2006;6:473-474
8. Suk KS, Lee HM, Kim NH, et al. Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation in lumbar spinal fusion. Spine 2000;15:1843-1847
9. Fernandez-Fairen M, Sala P, Ramirez H, et al. A prospective randomized study of unilateral versus bilateral instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion in degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spine 2007;32:395-401.
10. Lehmann W, Ushmaev A, Ruecker A, et al. Comparison of open versus percutaneous pedicle screw insertion in a sheep model. Eur Spine J 2008;17:857-863
11. Kim DY, Lee SH, Chung SK, et al. Comparison of multifidus muscle atrophy and trunk extension muscle strength: percutaneous versus open pedicle screw fixation. Spine 2005;30:123-129