Key parameters of face shape variation in 3D in a large sample

Journal of Forensic Sciences

Volumn 55, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 159-162

  Evison, Martin ^a   Dryden, Ian ^b   Fieller, Nick ^c   Mallett, Xanthé ^d   Morecroft, Lucy ^c   Schofield, Damian ^e   Bruegge, Richard Vorder ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

^e STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT OSWEGO   (United States)

^f Federal Bureau of Investigation   (United States)

Author keywords

Anthropometry; Biometrics; Facial comparison; Forensic science; Principal components analysis; Shape analysis

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOMETRY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; FACE; FACTUAL DATABASE; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PHOTOGRAPHY; PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SEX DETERMINATION; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BIOMETRY; DATABASES, FACTUAL; FACE; FEMALE; FORENSIC ANTHROPOLOGY; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHOTOGRAMMETRY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SEX DETERMINATION BY SKELETON; SOFTWARE;

EID: 74249115772     PISSN: 00221198     EISSN: 15564029     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01213.x     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Jain AK, Flynn PJ, Ross AA. Handbook of biometrics. New York, NY : Springer, 2007.
2. Frowd CD, Hancock PJB, Carson D. EvoFIT: a holistic, evolutionary facial imaging technique for creating composites. ACM Trans Appl Percept 2004 1 : 19 39.
3. Evison MP, Vorder Bruegge RW. The magna database: a database of three-dimensional facial images for research in human identification and recognition. Forensic Sci Commun 2008 10 (2) [Online], http://www.fbi.gov/hq/ lab/fsc/backissu/april2008/research/2008-04-research01.htm (accessed November 13, 2008).
4. Dryden IL, Mardia KV. Statistical shape analysis. Chichester, UK : Wiley, 1998.
5. Mardia KV, Coombes A, Kirkbride J, Linney A, Bowie LJ. On statistical problems with face identification from photographs. J Appl Stat 1996 23 (6 655 676.
6. Yoshino M, Kubota S, Matsuda H, Imaizumi K, Miyasaka S, Seta S. Face-to-face video superimposition using three-dimensional physiognomic analysis. Jpn J Sci Technol Identif 1996 1 : 11 20.
7. Yoshino M, Matsuda H, Kubota S, Imaizumi K, Miyasaka S. Computer-assisted facial image identification system using 3D physiognomic range finder. Forensic Sci Int 2000 109 : 225 237.
8. Yoshino M, Matsuda H, Kubota S, Imaizumi K, Miyasaka S. Computer-assisted facial image identification system. Forensic Sci Comm 2001 3 (1) [Online], http://www.fbi.gov/hq/lab/fsc/backissu/jan2001/yoshino.htm (accessed November 13, 2008).
9. Porter G, Doran G. An anatomical and photographic technique for forensic facial identification. Forensic Sci Int 2000 114 (2 97 105.
10. Kleinberg K, Vanezis P, Burton MA. Failure of anthropometry as a facial identification technique using high-quality photographs. J Forensic Sci 2007 52 (4 779 783.
11. Stephen James Hookway, R v. EWCA Crim 212, United Kingdom Court of Appeal (1999), http://www.rn-ds-partnership.com/Documents/hookway.pdf (accessed September 7, 2009).
12. Farkas LG. Anthropometry of the head and face, 2nd edn. New York, NY : Raven Press, 1994.