Multisensory interactions elicited by audiovisual stimuli presented peripherally in a visual attention Task: A behavioral and event-related potential study in humans

Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 407-413

  Wu, Jinglong ^a   Li, Qi ^a,b   Bai, Ou ^c   Touge, Tetsuo ^d  

^a OKAYAMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b CHANGCHUN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^c VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d KAGAWA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Audiovisual interactions; Electrophysiology; Event related potentials; Multisensory; Retinotopic; Visual attention

Indexed keywords

ADULT; APPARATUS; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BEHAVIOR; ELECTRODE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; ELECTROOCULOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; RESPONSE TIME; SENSORY STIMULATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEMPORAL LOBE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ATTENTION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 74249095687     PISSN: 07360258     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WNP.0b013e3181c298b1     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Anderson RS. Aliasing in peripheral vision for counterphase gratings. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1996;13:2288-2293.
2. Carrasco M, Ling S, Read S. Attention alters appearance. Nat Neurosci. 2004;7: 308-313.
3. Eimer M. An ERP study of sustained spatial attention to stimulus eccentricity. Biol Psychol. 2000;52:205-220.
4. Fort A, Delpuech C, Pernier J, Giard MH. Early auditory-visual interactions in human cortex during nonredundant target identification. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2002;14:20-30.
5. Frassinetti F, Bolognini N, Ladavas E. Enhancement of visual perception by crossmodal visuo-auditory interaction. Exp Brain Res. 2002;147:332-343.
6. Giard MH, Peronnet F. Auditory-visual integration during multimodal object recognition in humans: a behavioral and electrophysiological study. J Cogn Neurosci. 1999;11:473-490.
7. Gondan M, Niederhaus B, Rosler F, Roder B. Multisensory processing in the redundant-target effect: a behavioral and event-related potential study. Percept Psychophys. 2005;67:713-726.
8. Goolkasian P. Retinal location and its effect on the spatial distribution of visual attention. Am J Psychol. 1999;112:187-214.
9. Handy TC, Khoe W. Attention and sensory gain control: a peripheral visual process? J Cogn Neurosci. 2005;17:1936-1949.
10. McDonald JJ, Teder-Salejarvi WA, Hillyard SA. Involuntary orienting to sound improves visual perception. Nature. 2000;407:906-908.
11. McDonald JJ, Ward LM. Involuntary listening aids seeing: evidence from human electrophysiology. Psychol Sci. 2000;11:167-171.
12. Molholm S, Ritter W, Murray MM, et al. Multisensory auditory-visual interactions during early sensory processing in humans: a high-density electrical mapping study. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2002;14:115-128.
13. Posner MI. Orienting of attention. Q J Exp Psychol. 1980;32:3-25.
14. Rigoulot S, Delplanque S, Despretz P, et al. Peripherally presented emotional scenes: a spatiotemporal analysis of early ERP responses. Brain Topogr. 2008;20:216-223.
15. Schroger E, Widmann A. Speeded responses to audiovisual signal changes result from bimodal integration. Psychophysiology. 1998;35:755-759.
16. Shams L, Kamitani Y, Shimojo S. Illusions. What you see is what you hear. Nature. 2000;408:788.
17. Stein BE, Meredith MA. The Merging of the Senses. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1993:123-156.
18. Stein BE, Meredith MA, Wallace MT. Development and neural basis of multisensory integration. In: Lewkowitz DJ, Lickliter R, eds. The Development of Intersensory Perception: Comparative Perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1993:81-105.
19. Talsma D, Doty TJ, Woldorff MG. Selective attention and audiovisual integration: is attending to both modalities a prerequisite for early integration? Cereb Cortex. 2007;17:679-690.
20. Talsma D, Woldorff MG. Selective attention and multisensory integration: multiple phases of effects on the evoked brain activity. J Cogn Neurosci. 2005;17:1098-1114.
21. Teder-Salejarvi WA, Di Russo F, McDonald JJ, Hillyard SA. Effects of spatial congruity on audio-visual multimodal integration. J Cogn Neurosci. 2005; 17:1396-1409.
22. Teder-Salejarvi WA, McDonald JJ, Di Russo F, Hillyard SA. An analysis of audio-visual crossmodal integration by means of event-related potential (ERP) recordings. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2002;14:106-114.
23. Vidal J, Giard MH, Roux S, et al. Cross-modal processing of auditory-visual stimuli in a no-task paradigm: a topographic event-related potential study. Clin Neurophysiol. 2008;119:763-771.
24. Watkins S, Shams L, Tanaka S, et al. Sound alters activity in human V1 in association with illusory visual perception. Neuroimage. 2006;31:1247-1256.