An integrated 3D constant offset GPR and resistivity survey on a sealed landfill - Ilhavo, NW Portugal

Journal of Applied Geophysics

Volumn 70, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 58-71

  Hermozilha, H ^a   Grangeia, C ^a   Matias, M Senos ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AVEIRO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Geophysics; GPR; Landfills; Resistivity; Structure

Indexed keywords

CONTAMINATION PLUME; GEOPHYSICAL DATA; GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS; HIGH RESOLUTION; HYDROGEOLOGICAL; INTERNAL STRUCTURE; NEAR-SURFACE GEOPHYSICS; PORTUGAL; RESISTIVITY STRUCTURE; RESISTIVITY SURVEYS; TIME EVOLUTIONS;

GEOLOGICAL SURVEYS; GEOPHYSICS; LAND FILL; STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY; THREE DIMENSIONAL; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

WASTE DISPOSAL;

DATA INTERPRETATION; ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY; GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY; GROUND PENETRATING RADAR; HYDROGEOLOGY; LANDFILL; THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING;

EID: 74149086223     PISSN: 09269851     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2009.11.004     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Alumbaugh D.L., and Newman G.A. Image appraisal for 2-D and 3-D electromagnetic inversion. Geophysics 65 (2000) 1455-1467
2. Atekwana E.A., Sauck W.A., and Werkema Jr. D.D. Investigation of geoelectrical signatures at a hydrocarbon contaminated site. Journal of Applied Geophysics 44 (2000) 167-180
3. Bhattacharya B.B., and Sen M.K. Depth of investigation of collinear electrode arrays over homogeneous anisotropic half-space in direct current methods. Geophysics 46 (1981) 768-780
4. Biandini G., Santarato G., and Vaccaro C. Geochemical characterization and geophysical mapping of landfills: the Marozzo canal study (NE Italy). Environmental Geology 45 (2004) 439-447 (45)
5. Benson R., Glaccum R., and Noel M. Geophysical techniques for sensing buried waste and waste migration. Environ. Monitor. Syst. Lab., Off. Res. Develop., US Environ. Protect. Ag., Las Vegas,NV,Rep. 68-03-3050 (1983) 114
6. Benson A.K., Frederickson C., and Mustoe N.B. Ground penetrating radar, electrical resistivity, soil and water quality studies integrated to determine the source(s) and geometry of hydrocarbon contamination at a site in north-central Arizona. Proceedings 27th Symposium on Engineering Geology and Geotechnical Engineering (1991) 38.1-38.13
7. Bernstone C., Dahlin T., Ohlsson T., and Hogland W. DC-resistivity mapping of the internal landfills structure: two pre-excavation surveys. Environmental Geology 39 (2000) 360-371
8. Brewster M.L., Annan A.P., Greenhouse J.P., Kueper B.H., Olhoeft G.R., Redman J.D., and Sander K.A. Observed migration of a controlled DNAPL release by geophysical methods. Ground Water Vol. 33, 6 (1995) 977-987 Nov.-Dec.1995
9. Butler D. Near Surface Geophysics, SEG vol. 732 (2006). 1-56080-130-1
10. Cardarelli E., and Bernabini M. Two case studies of the determination ofparameters of urban waste dumps. Applied Geophysics 36 (1997) 167-174
11. Frangos W. Electrical detection of leaks in lined waste ponds. Geophysics 62 6 (1997) 1737-1744
12. Gibson P.J., Lyle P., and George D. Environmental applications of magnetometry profiling. Environmental Geology 27 (1996) 178-183
13. Green A., Lanz E., and Maurer H. A template for geophysical investigations of small landfills. Leading Edge 18 (1999) 248-254
14. Greenhouse J., Monier-Williams M., Ellert N., and Slaine D. Geophysical methods in water contamination studies. Proc. Exploration'87. Ont. Geol. Surv., Spec Vol. 3 (1989) 666-677
15. GSSI Handbook For RADAR Inspection of Concrete, 2006, Published by Geophysical Survey Systems, Inc., 38 pp., www.geophysical.com.
16. Lanz E., Maurer H., Ansorge J., and Green A. High-resolution travel time tomography used to delineate a shallow waste disposal site. Proceedings of the 3rd Meeting Environmental and Engineering Geophysics (1997), Aarhus, Denmark 33-36
17. Matias M., and Hermozilha H. A 3D constant offset GPR survey on Ílhavo Landfill. Proceedings of the 12th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Helsinky, Finland vol. A031 (2006) 5 90-73781-62-O
18. Matias M., Silva M., Ferreira P., and Ramalho E. A geophysical and hydrogeological study of aquifers contamination by a landfill. Journal of Applied Geophysics 32 (1994) 155-162
19. Matias M., Marques da Silva M., Cabral B., and Hermozilha H. An Em and GPR survey to study and monitor aquifers contamination by a landfill, European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers, Extended Abstracts volume 2, P106, ISBN 90-73781-12-4 (2000), Glasgow, England 4 pp
20. McGillivray P.R., and Oldenburg D.W. Methods for calculating Frechet derivatives and sensitivities for the non-linear inverse problem: a comparative study. Geophysical Prospecting 38 (1990) 499-524
21. Oldenburg D.W., and Li Y. Estimating depth of investigation in dc resistivity and IP surveys. Geophysics 64 (1999) 403-416
22. Orlando L., and Marchesi E. Georadar as a tool to identify and characterize solid waste dump deposits. Journal of Applied Geophysics 48 (2001) 163-174
23. Pomposiello C., Favetto A., and Ostera H. Resistivity imaging and ground penetrating radar surveys at Gualeguaychu landfill, Entre Rios Province, Argentina: evidences of a contamiantion plume. Proceedings of the 17th IAGA, WG1.2 workshop on Electromagnetic Induction in the Earth, Hylderabad, India (2004) 5
24. Porsani J.L., Malagutti Filho W., Elis V.R., Fisseha S., Dourado J.C., and Moura H.P. The use of GPR and VES in delineating a contamination plume in a landfill site: a case study in SE Brazil. Journal of Applied Geophysics 55 (2004) 199-209
25. Radzevicius S.J., Guy E.D., and Daniels J.J. Pitfalls in GPR data interpretation: differentiating stratigraphy and buried objects from periodic antenna and target effects. Geophysical Research Letters 27 20 (2000) 3393-3396
26. Reynolds J. Na Introduction to Applied and Environmental Geophysics vol. 796 (1997), Wyley. 0-471-95555-8
27. Roberts R., Hinze W., and Leap D. Application of the gravity method to the investigation of a landfill in glaciated mid-continent USA: a case study. In: Ward S.H. (Ed). Geotechnical and Environmental Geophysics vol. 2 (1990), Society of Exploration Geophysicists 253-259
28. Sandmeier K.J., 2006 . ReflexW © Manual V.4.5, 197pp. www.sandmeier-geo.de
29. Santarnerino J., and Fam M. Dielectric permittivity of soil mixed with organic and inorganic fluids - 0.02 GHz to 1.3 GHz. Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics 2 1 (1997) 120-134
30. Sauck W.A. A model for the resistivity structure of LNAPL plumes and their environs in sandy aquifers. Journal of Applied Geophysics 44 (2000) 151-165
31. Sauck W.A., Atekwana E.A., and Nash M.S. High conductivities associated with an LNAPL plume imaged by integrated geophysical techniques. Journal of Engineering and Environmental Geophysics 2 (1998) 203-212
32. Sharma P.V. Environmental and Engineering Geophysics (1997), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 475 pp
33. Sigurdsson T. Ground penetrating radar for geological mapping. Aarhus Geoscience 3 (1995) 117
34. Slaine D.D., Rehme P.E., Hunter J.A., Pullan S.E., Greenhouse J.P., Daniels J.L., and Keys W.S. Geophysical well logging for evaluating hazardous waste sites. In: Ward S.H. (Ed). Geotechnical and Environmental Geophysics, SEG Vol. 1 (1990) 263-285
35. Soupios P., Papadopoulos I., Kouli M., Georgaky I., Vallianatos F., and Kokkinou E. Investigation of waste disposal areas using electrical methods: a case study from Chania, Crete, Greece. Environmental Geology 51 (2007) 1249-1261
36. Zacher G., Tezkan B., Mueller I., Goldman M., Hoerdt A., and Neubauer F. Application of the radio magnetotellurics to the investigation of a waste deposit in Cologne, Germany. 56th Meet. Eur. Assoc. Explor. Geophysics. Extended Abstracts vol. I053 (1994)