A steam generator model identification and robust H∞ controller design with ν-gap metric for a feedwater control system

Annals of Nuclear Energy

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 180-195

  Sohn, Jong Joo ^a   Seong, Poong Hyun ^a  

^a Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTROL PERFORMANCE; CONTROLLER DESIGNS; CONTROLLER DEVELOPMENT; DATA SETS; DESIGN TECHNIQUE; FEEDWATER CONTROL SYSTEM; FEEDWATER SYSTEMS; GAP METRICS; INPUT-OUTPUT DATA; KOREAN STANDARD NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS; LOOP-SHAPING H; MODEL EXPERIMENTS; POWER RANGE; PROCESS MODEL; PROPORTIONAL-INTEGRAL; ROBUST CONTROLLERS; ROBUST H; SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION ALGORITHMS; THERMAL-HYDRAULIC MODEL; U-TUBE TYPE; VALIDATION RESULTS;

ALGORITHMS; DESCALING; HYDRAULIC MODELS; HYDRAULIC STRUCTURES; IDENTIFICATION (CONTROL SYSTEMS); NUCLEAR ENERGY; NUCLEAR INDUSTRY; NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS); STEAM; STEAM GENERATORS; STEAM POWER PLANTS;

CONTROLLERS;

EID: 74149084087     PISSN: 03064549     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2009.11.005     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. EG&G Idaho Inc., 1990, RELAP5/MOD3 Code Manual, NUREG/CR-5535 (EGG-2596).
2. Genc, A.U., 2002, Linear Parameter-varying Modeling and Robust Control of Variable Cam Timing Engines, Ph.D. Dissertation, Wolfson College, Cambridge University.
3. ∞-norm bound and relations to risk sensitivity. Systems & Control Letters 11 (1988) 167-172
4. ∞ bounded uncertainty. IEEE Transaction of Automatic Control AC-34 8 (1989) 821-830
5. Hrvatin, S., Petelin, S., Stefan, J., Tuma, M., 1998, Relap5 new steam generator model for Krsko NPP. In: Proceedings of Nuclear Energy in Central Europe, Čatež, Slovenia.
6. Ilinoya, and Altper. Inverse response on process control frequency. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 54 7 (1962) 39-43
7. KEPCO, 1998, Final Safety Analysis Report for Ulchin Unit 3 & 4.
8. Ljung L. System Identification: Theory for the User. second ed (1999), Prentice Hall, New Jersey
9. Ljung, L., 2002. Identification for control: simple process model. In: Proceedings of the 41st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Las Vegas, Nevada.
10. Lee Y.J., and Lee U.C. Digitalization of the nuclear SG level control system. Nuclear Engineering and Technology 125 (1993) 135
11. Lee Y.J. Water level of nuclear plant SG. Transaction of KSME Journal 16 (1992) 753-764
12. ∞ synthesis. IEEE Transaction of Automatic Control AC-37 (1992) 759-769
13. MathWorks. MATLAB Version 7.0.4 (2005), MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA
14. MathWorks. System Identification Toolbox 6.1.1 (2005), MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA
15. Skogestad S., and Postlethwaite I. Multivariable Feedback Control: Analysis and Design vol. 153 (1996), John Wiley & Sons
16. Uspuras E., Kaliatka A., and Bubelis E. Development of Ignalina NPP RBMK-1500 Reactor RELAP5-3D Model. Nuclear Engineering and Design 220 2 (2003) 159-178
17. Vinnicombe G. Frequency domain uncertainty and the graph topology. IEEE Transaction of Automatic Control 38 (1993) 1371-1383
18. 2-gap metric. In: Proceedings of American Control Conference, Chicago, Illinois, pp. 1133-1137.
19. ∞: Loop-shaping and the ν-gap Metric. first ed (2001), Imperial College Press