The policy-shaper's anxiety at the innovation kick: How far do innovation theories really help in the world of policy?

Perspectives on Innovation

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 464-489

  Caracostas, Paraskevas ^a  

^a EUROPEAN COMMISSION   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 74149083674     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511618390.026     Document Type: Chapter

References (46)

1. Badie, B. 1995. La findes territoires, Essai sur le désordre international et sur l’utilitésociale du respec. Paris: Fayard
2. Bartzokas, A. 2002. ‘Innovation Policy Instruments: A review of EU Trends and Relevant literature’, Final Report of the STRATA consolidating workshop, Session 4, Brussels, 22–23 April (available at www.cordis.lu/improving/strata/workshop.htm)
3. Borras, S. 2004. ‘Systems of Innovation Theory and The European Union’, Science and Public Policy 31 (6): 425–433
4. Boyer, R. 1995a. ‘Vers une théorie originale des institutions économiques?’ in(eds.)1995. Théorie de la régulation, ‘’état des savoirs. Paris: La Découverte
5. Boyer, R. 1995b. ‘La théorie de la régulation dans les années 1990’ in N_ Spécial
6. Boyer, R. and Saillard, Y. Revue Actuel Marx, Théorie de la régulation, théorie des conventions, N_17, 1esemestre 1995
7. Boyer, R. and Saillard, Y. 1995. Théorie de la régulation, l’état des savoirs. Paris: La Découverte
8. Callon, M. 1994. ‘Is Science a Public good? Fifth Mullins Lecture, Virginia Polytechnic Institute’, Science Technology and Human Values, 19: 395–424
9. Caracostas, P. 1987. Two tier Europe as European Technology Community? Paper presented at the ‘European Conference on industrial integration strategies: Pandora’s box?’, 9–11 February 1987, Erasmus University Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
10. Caracostas, P. and Muldur, U. 1997. Society, the Endless Frontier. Brussels and Luxembourg: European Communities Publication Office
11. Caracostas, P. and Soete, L. 1997. ‘The Building of Cross-Border Institutions in Europe: Towards a European System of Innovation?’, in Edquist, C. (ed.) 1997. Systems of Innovation; Technologies, Institutions and Organizations. London: Pinter
12. Cronberg, T. and Sørensen, K.H. 1995. ‘Similar Concerns, Different Styles? A note on European Approaches to The Social Shaping of Technology’, in COST Social sciences A4, Proceedings of the COST A4 in Ruvaslahti, Finland, January 13 and 14, 1994
13. Di Ruzza, 1995. ‘Théorie des systèmes productifs et recomposition de l’économie mondiale’ in N_ Spécial Revue Actuel Marx, Théorie de la régulation/théorie des conventions, 1e tr. 1995
14. Edquist, C. 1997. Systems of Innovation; Technologies, Institutions and organizations. London: Pinter
15. Edquist, C. 2004. ‘Reflections on The Systems of Innovation Approach’, Science and Public Policy 31 (6): 485–489
16. European Commission 2004. Technology Platforms, from Definition to Implementation of a Common Research Agenda. Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D.C. and Nelson, R.R. (eds.) 2005, The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. European Commission 2005. ‘Commission Staff Paper, Annex to The Proposal for the Council and European Parliament Decisions on the 7th Framework Programme (EC and Euratom), Main Report: Overall Summary, Impact Assessment and Ex Ante Evaluation’, COM(2005) 119 final
18. Fougeyrollas, A., Le Moue¨l, P. and Zagamé, P. 2002. The NEMESIS model: New Econometric Model for Environment and Sustainable Development Implementation Strategies. Brussels: ECOMOD
19. Gaffard, J.L., Bruno, S., Longhi, C. and Quéré, M. 1993. Cohérence et diversité des systèmes d’innovation en Europe. Rapport de synthèse, FAST Dossier, Continental Europe: Science, Technology and Community cohesion, Vol. 19, Brussels
20. Guellec, D. and Ralle, P. 1995. Les nouvelles théories de la croissance, Paris: Repères, La Découverte
21. Gregersen, B., Johnson, B., and Kristensen, A. 1994. ‘National Systems of Innovation and European Integration’, paper presented to the EUNETIC conference on ‘Evolutionary Economics of Technical Change: Assessment of Results and New Frontiers’, European Parliament, Strasbourg, October 6–8
22. Handke, P. 1970. Die Angst des Tormanns beim Elfmeter (The Goalkeeper’s Anxiety at the Penalty Kick)
23. High Level Expert Group for the European Commission 2002. Thinking, Debating and Shaping the Future: Foresight for Europe; available at ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/foresight/docs/for_hleg_final_report_en.pdf
24. H. M. Treasury, DTI and Department for Education and Skills 2004. Science and Innovation Investment Framework 2004–2014, Annex A, The Economic Case for Investment in Science and Research
25. Kuhlman, S. 2003. ‘Evaluation of research and innovation policies: a discussion of trends with examples from Germany’, International Journal of Technology Management 26(2/3/4)
26. Kuttner, R. 1996. Everything for Sale: The Virtues and Limits of Markets. New York: Alfred A. Knopf
27. Le Galès, P. 2004. Article ‘Gouvernance’ in Bouss aguet, L., Jacquot, S. and Ravinet, P. (eds.) Dictionnaire despolitiques publiques. Paris: Press es de Sciences Po
28. Lundvall, B.A. 1992. National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter
29. Lundvall, B.A. and Borras, S. 2005. ‘Science, Technology and Innovation Policy’, in Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D.C. and Nelson, R. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Oxford University Press
30. Malerba, F. 2004. Sectoral Systems of Innovation: Concept, Issues and Analyses of Six Major Sectors in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
31. Malerba, F. 2005. ‘Sectoral Systems, How and Why Innovation Differs across Sectors’, in Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D.C. and Nelson, R. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Oxford University Press
32. Muldur, U. 1991, ‘R&D Funding at the crossroads of industrial, financial and political logic’, Fast Working Paper, European Commission
33. Muller, P. 1994. ‘La mutation des politiques publiques’, N_ Spé cial de la revue Pouvoirs sur ‘Europe, de la Communauté a` l’Union’, Avril
34. Nelson, R. 1993. National Systems of Innovation: A Comparative Study. Oxford: Oxford University Press
35. Niosi, J. and Bellon, B. 1994. ‘The Global Interdependence of National Innovation Systems: Evidence, Limits and Implications’, Technology in Society 16 (2): 173–97
36. OECD 1995. National Systems for Financing Innovation. OECD, Paris
37. OECD 2004. Science and Innovation Policy: Key Challenges and Opportunities. OECD, Paris
38. Romer, P. 1986. ‘Increasing Returns and Long-Term Growth’, Journal of Political Economy 98: 71–102
39. Romer, P. 1993. ‘Implementing a National Technology Strategy with Self- Organising Industry Investment Boards’, Brookings Papers on Microeconomics 2: 345–99
40. Technopolis, 2001. A Singular Council, Evaluation of the Research Council of Norway; available at http://www.technopolis.co.uk/downloads/243_ RCN_synthesis.pdf
41. Teubal, M. 1995. ‘A Catalytic and Evolutionary Approach to Horizontal Technology Policies’, discussion paper, the Jerusalem Institute for Israel Studies, Jerusalem
42. Teubal, M. 1996. ‘R & D and Technology Policy in NICs as Learning Processes’, World Development 24 (3): 449–60
43. Teubal, M. 1997. ‘A Catalytic and Evolutionary Approach to Horizontal Technology Policies (HTPs)’, Research Policy 25 (8): 1161–1188
44. Tsipouri, L. and Xanthakis, M. 1993. Impact of the EC Science and Technology Policy on the Greek S/T Policy. University of Athens
45. Weiss, Carol 1977. ‘Research for Policy’s Sake: The Enlightenment Function of Social Science Research’, Policy Analysis 3 (4): 531–45
46. Weiss, Carol. 1991. ‘Policy research as advocacy: Pro and con’, Knowledge and Policy 4 (1/2): 37–56