Phylogenetic constraints on fine-scale patterns of habitat use by eight primate species in eastern Ecuador

Journal of Tropical Ecology

Volumn 25, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 571-582

  Sheth, Seema Nayan ^a   Loiselle, Bette A ^a   Blake, John G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI ST LOUIS   (United States)

Author keywords

Amazon; Atelidae; Cebidae; Community structure; Habitat use; Neotropical primates; Niche conservatism; Pitheciidae; Species coexistence

Indexed keywords

CENSUS; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; DIVERGENCE; FOREST CANOPY; HABITAT AVAILABILITY; HABITAT TYPE; HABITAT USE; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; NEOTROPICAL REGION; PHYLOGENETICS; PHYLOGENY; PRIMATE;

AMAZONIA; ECUADOR;

CEBIDAE; PITHECIIDAE; PRIMATES;

EID: 74049151075     PISSN: 02664674     EISSN: 14697831     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0266467409990216     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. BLAKE, J. G. 2007. Neotropical forest bird communities: a comparison of species richness and composition at local and regional scales. The Condor 109:237-255.
2. BOBADILLA, U. L. & FERRARI, S. F. 2000. Habitat use by Chiropotes satanas utahicki and syntopic platyrrhines in eastern Amazonia. American Journal of Primatology 50:215-224.
3. BOURLÍERE, F. 1985. Primate communities: their structure and role in tropical ecosystems. International Journal of Primatology 6:1-26.
4. BROCKELMAN, W. Y. & ALI, R. 1987. Methods of surveying forest primate populations. Pp. 23-62 in Marsh, C.W. & Mittermeier, R. A. (eds.). Primate conservation in the tropical rain forest. AlanR. Liss, Inc., New York.
5. BUCHANAN-SMITH, H.M., HARDIE, S.M., CACERES, C. & PRESCOTT, M. J. 2000. Distribution and forest utilization of Saguinus and other primates of the Pando Department, northern Bolivia. International Journal of Primatology 21:353-379.
6. CLARKE, K. R. 1993. Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Australian Journal of Ecology 18:117-143.
7. DAVIS, E. B. 2005. Comparison of climate space and phylogeny of Marmota (Mammalia: Rodentia) indicates a connection between evolutionary history and climate preference. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, series B 272;519-526.
8. DEW, J. L.2005.Foraging, food choice, andfood processing by sympatric ripe-fruit specialists: Lagothrix lagotricha poeppigii and Ateles belzebuth belzebuth. International Journal of Primatology 26:1107-1135.
9. DI FIORE, A. 1997. Ecology and behavior of lowland woolly monkeys (Lagothrix lagotricha poeppigii, Atelinae) in Eastern Ecuador. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California at Davis, Davis.
10. DI FIORE, A., FERNANDEZ-DUQUE, E. & HURST, D. 2007. Adult male replacement in socially monogamous equatorial saki monkeys (Pithecia aequatorialis). Folia Primatologica 78:88-98.
11. FLEAGLE, J. G. &MITTERMEIER, R.A. 1980. Locomotor behavior, body size, and comparative ecology of seven Surinam monkeys. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 52:301-314.
12. FLEAGLE, J. G. & REED, K. E. 1996. Comparing primate communities: a multivariate approach. Journal of Human Evolution 30:489-510.
13. FLEAGLE, J. G. & REED, K. E. 1999. Phylogenetic and temporal perspectives on primate ecology. Pp. 92-115 in Fleagle, J. G., Janson, C. H. & Reed, K. E. (eds). Primate communities. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
14. FLEAGLE, J., MITTERMEIER, R.&SKOPEC, A. 1981. Differential habitat use by Cebus apella and Saimiri sciureus in central Surinam. Primates 22:361-367.
15. FOODEN, J. 1963. A revision of the woolly monkeys (genus Lagothrix). Journal ofMammalogy 44:213-247.
16. HARDIN, G. 1960. The competitive exclusion principle. Science 131:1292-1297.
17. HARVEY, P. H. & PAGEL, M. D. 1991. The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 248 pp.
18. HAUGAASEN, T. & PERES, C. A. 2005. Primate assemblage structure in Amazonian flooded and unflooded forests. American Journal of Primatology 67:243-258. (Pubitemid 43095996)
19. HEYMANN, E. W. 2000. Field observations of the golden-mantled tamarin, Saguinus tripartitus, on the Ŕio Curaray, Peruvian Amazonia. Folia Primatologica 71:392-398.
20. HEYMANN, E. W., ENCARNACÍON, C. F. & CANAQUIN, Y. J. E. 2002. Primates of the Ŕio Curaray, northern Peruvian Amazon. International Journal of Primatology 23:191-201.
21. HUTCHINSON, R. E. 1957. Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 22:415-427.
22. KARUBIAN, J., FABARA, J., YUNES, D., JORGENSEN, J. P., ROMO, D. & SMITH, T. B. 2005. Temporal and spatial patterns of macaw abundance in the Ecuadorian Amazon. The Condor 107:617-626.
23. KRUSKAL, J. B.1964.Nonmetricmultidimensional scaling:anumerical method. Psychometrika 29:115-129.
24. LOISELLE, B. A., BLAKE, J. G., DURÃES, R., RYDER, T. B. & TORI, W. P. 2007. Environmental segregation in lek sites among six cooccurring species of manakins (Aves: Pipridae) in eastern Ecuador. Auk 123:247-258.
25. LORD, J., WESTOBY, M. & LEISHMAN, M. 1995. Seed size and phylogeny in six temperate floras: constraints, niche conservatism, and adaptation. American Naturalist 146:349-364.
26. LOSOS, J. B., LEAL, M., GLOR, R. E., DE QUEIROZ, K., HERTZ, P. E., RODRIGUEZ SCHETTINO, L., CHAMIZO LARA, A., JACKMAN, R. R. & LARSON, A. 2003. Niche lability in the evolution of a Caribbean lizard community. Nature 424:542-545.
27. MACFADDEN, B. J. 1990. Chronology of Cenozoic primate localities in South America. Journal of Human Evolution 19:151-156.
28. MARSH, L. K. 2004. Primate species at Tiputini Biodiversity Station, Ecuador. Neotropical Primates 12:75-78.
29. MATHER, P. M. 1976. Computational methods of multivariate analysis in physical geography. J.Wiley & Sons, London. 532 pp.
30. MCCUNE, B. & GRACE, J. B. 2002. Analysis of ecological communities. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, Oregon. 300 pp.
31. MITTERMEIER, R.A. &VANROOSMALEN, M. G.M. 1981. Preliminary observations on habitat utilization and diet in eight Surinam monkeys. Folia Primatologica 36:1-39.
32. PERES, C. A. 1988. Primate community structure in western Brazilian Amazonia. Primate Conservation 9:83-87.
33. PERES, C. A. 1993. Structure and spatial organization of anAmazonian terra firme forest primate community. Journal of Tropical Ecology 9:259-276.
34. PERES, C. A. 1994. Primate responses to phenological changes in an Amazonian terra firme forest. Biotropica 26:98-112.
35. PERES, C. A. 1997. Primate community structure at twenty western Amazonian flooded and unflooded forests. Journal of Tropical Ecology 13:381-405.
36. PERES, C. A. 1999. General guidelines for standardizing line-transect surveys of tropical forest primates. Neotropical Primates 7:11-16.
37. PERES, C. A. & JANSON, C. H. 1999. Species coexistence, distribution, and environmental determinants of neotropical primate richness: a community-level zoogeographic analysis. Pp. 55-74 in Fleagle, J. G., Janson, C. H.&Reed, K. E. (eds.) Primate communities.Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
38. PETERSON, A. T., SOBERÓN, J. & SÁNCHEZ-CORDERO, V. 1999. Conservatism of ecological niches in evolutionary time. Science 285:1265-1267.
39. PITMAN, N. C. A., TERBORGH, J. W., SILMAN, M. R., NUNEZ, V. P., NEILL, D. A., CER ́ON, C. E., PALACIOS, W. A. & AULESTIA, M. 2002.Acomparison of tree species diversity in twoupperAmazonian forests. Ecology 83:3210-3224.
40. POZO R., W. E. 2004. Preferencia de h́abitat de seis primates simṕatricos del Yasuńi, Ecuador. Ecoloǵia Aplicada 3:128-133.
41. REED, K. E. & BIDNER, L. R. 2004. Primate communities: past, present, and possible future. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology 47:2-39.
42. RICE, N. H., MART́INEZ-MEYER, E. & PETERSON, A. T. 2003. Ecological niche differentiation in the Aphelocoma jays: a phylogenetic perspective. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 80:369-383.
43. SCHNEIDER, H., CANAVEZ, F. C., SAMPAIO, I., MOREIRA, M. A. M., TAGLIARO, C. H. & SEUÁNEZ, H.N. 2001. Canmolecular data place each neotropical monkey in its own branch? Chromosoma 109:515-523.
44. SILVERTOWN, J., DODD, M. & GOWING, D. 2001. Phylogeny and the niche structure of meadow plant communities. Journal of Ecology 89:428-435.
45. SILVERTOWN, J., MCCONWAY, K., GOWING, D., DODD, M., FAY, M. F., JOSEPH, J. A. & DOLPHIN, K. 2006. Absence of phylogenetic signal in the niche structure of meadow plant communities. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, series B 273:39-44.
46. SMITH, R. J. & JUNGERS, W. L. 1997. Body mass in comparative primatology. Journal of Human Evolution 32:523-559.
47. STEVENSON, P.R., QUIÑONES, M. J.&AHUMADA, J.A.2000. Influence of fruit availability on ecological overlap among fourNeotropical primates at Tinigua National Park, Colombia. Biotropica 32:533-544.
48. TERBORGH, J. 1983. Five new world primates: a study in comparative ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton. 260 pp.
49. TERBORGH, J. & VAN SCHAIK, C. P. 1987. Convergence vs. nonconvergence in primate communities. Pp. 205-226 in Gee, J. H. R. & Giller, P. S. (eds). Organization of communities: past and present. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
50. VAN ROOSMALEN, M. G. M., VAN ROOSMALEN, T. & MITTERMEIER, R. A. 2002. A taxonomic review of the titi monkeys, genus Callicebus Thomas, 1903, with the description of two new species, Callicebus bernhardi and Callicebus stephennashi, from Brazilian Amazonia. Neotropical Primates 10 (Suppl.):1-52.
51. WALLACE, R. B., PAINTER, R. L. E. & TABER, A. B. 1998. Primate diversity, habitat preferences, and population density estimates in Noel KempffMercado National Park, Santa Cruz Department, Bolivia. American Journal of Primatology 46:197-211.
52. WEBB, C. O., ACKERLY, D.D., MCPEEK, M.A.&DONOGHUE, M.J.2002. Phylogenies and community ecology. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33:475-505.
53. WIENS, J. J. & GRAHAM, C. H. 2005. Niche conservatism: integrating evolution, ecology, and conservation biology. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 36:519-539.
54. YOULATOS, D.1999.Comparativelocomotionof six sympatricprimates in Ecuador. Annales des Sciences Naturelles 20:161-168.
55. YOULATOS, D. 2004. Multivariate analysis of organismal and habitat parameters in two Neotropical primate communities. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 123:181-194.
56. ZAR, J. H. 1999. Biostatistical analysis. (Fourth edition). Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River. 962 pp.