-
1
-
-
74049108884
-
Guideline for optimization of colorectal cancer surgery and pathology
-
Smith AJ, Driman DK, Spithoff K, et al.: Guideline for optimization of colorectal cancer surgery and pathology. J Surg Oncol 2010;1:5-12.
-
(2010)
J Surg Oncol
, Issue.1
, pp. 5-12
-
-
Smith, A.J.1
Driman, D.K.2
Spithoff, K.3
-
2
-
-
0035906213
-
Guidelines 2000 for colon and rectal cancer surgery
-
Nelson H, Petrelli N, Carlin A, et al.: Guidelines 2000 for colon and rectal cancer surgery. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001;93:583-596.
-
(2001)
J Natl Cancer Inst
, vol.93
, pp. 583-596
-
-
Nelson, H.1
Petrelli, N.2
Carlin, A.3
-
3
-
-
33845659308
-
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 3. Group composition and consultation process
-
Fretheim A, Schunemann H, Oxman AD: Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 3. Group composition and consultation process. Health Res Policy Syst 2006;4:15-20.
-
(2006)
Health Res Policy Syst
, vol.4
, pp. 15-20
-
-
Fretheim, A.1
Schunemann, H.2
Oxman, A.D.3
-
4
-
-
0344394277
-
Improvement in quality of colorectal cancer pathology reporting with a standardized proforma - A comparative study
-
Beattie GC, McAdam TK, Elliott S, et al.: Improvement in quality of colorectal cancer pathology reporting with a standardized proforma - A comparative study. Colorectal Dis 2003;5:558-562.
-
(2003)
Colorectal Dis
, vol.5
, pp. 558-562
-
-
Beattie, G.C.1
McAdam, T.K.2
Elliott, S.3
-
5
-
-
16544378234
-
The computer synoptic operative report - A leap forward in the science of surgery
-
Edhemovic I, Temple WJ, de Gara CJ, et al.: The computer synoptic operative report - A leap forward in the science of surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 2004;11:941-947.
-
(2004)
Ann Surg Oncol
, vol.11
, pp. 941-947
-
-
Edhemovic, I.1
Temple, W.J.2
de Gara, C.J.3
-
6
-
-
43049113533
-
Rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations GRADE: An emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
-
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist G, et al.: Rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations GRADE: An emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Br Med J 2008;336:924-926.
-
(2008)
Br Med J
, vol.336
, pp. 924-926
-
-
Guyatt, G.H.1
Oxman, A.D.2
Vist, G.3
-
7
-
-
41949107544
-
A for effort: Learning from the application of the GRADE approach to Cancer Guideline Development
-
Brouwers MC, Somerfield MR, Browman GP: A for effort: Learning from the application of the GRADE approach to Cancer Guideline Development. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:1025-1026.
-
(2008)
J Clin Oncol
, vol.26
, pp. 1025-1026
-
-
Brouwers, M.C.1
Somerfield, M.R.2
Browman, G.P.3
-
8
-
-
0036786902
-
-
Rizzo JD, Lichtin AE,Woolf SH, et al.: Use of epoetin in patients with cancer: Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and American Society of Hematology. Blood 2002;100:2303; J Clin Oncol 2002; 20:4083-4107.
-
Rizzo JD, Lichtin AE,Woolf SH, et al.: Use of epoetin in patients with cancer: Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and American Society of Hematology. Blood 2002;100:2303; J Clin Oncol 2002; 20:4083-4107.
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
0031047837
-
Systematic reviews: Synthesis of best evidence for clinical practice
-
Cook DJ, Mulrow CD, Haynes RB: Systematic reviews: Synthesis of best evidence for clinical practice. Ann Int Med 1997;126: 376-380.
-
(1997)
Ann Int Med
, vol.126
, pp. 376-380
-
-
Cook, D.J.1
Mulrow, C.D.2
Haynes, R.B.3
-
10
-
-
16644390587
-
Practitioners as experts: The influence of practicing oncologists "in-the-field" on evidence-based guideline development
-
Browman GP, Makarski J, Robinson P, et al.: Practitioners as experts: The influence of practicing oncologists "in-the-field" on evidence-based guideline development. J Clin Oncol 2005;23: 113-119.
-
(2005)
J Clin Oncol
, vol.23
, pp. 113-119
-
-
Browman, G.P.1
Makarski, J.2
Robinson, P.3
-
11
-
-
3042741116
-
International assessment of the quality of clinical practice guidelines in oncology using the Appraisal of Guidelines and Research and Evaluation Instrument
-
Burgers JS, Fervers B, Haugh M, et al.: International assessment of the quality of clinical practice guidelines in oncology using the Appraisal of Guidelines and Research and Evaluation Instrument. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:2000-2007.
-
(2004)
J Clin Oncol
, vol.22
, pp. 2000-2007
-
-
Burgers, J.S.1
Fervers, B.2
Haugh, M.3
-
12
-
-
79959310058
-
The NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: A primer for users
-
Winn RJ, McClure J: The NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: A primer for users. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2003;1:5-13.
-
(2003)
J Natl Compr Canc Netw
, vol.1
, pp. 5-13
-
-
Winn, R.J.1
McClure, J.2
-
13
-
-
33745686474
-
Adaptation of clinical guidelines: Literature review and proposition for a framework and procedure
-
Fervers B, Burgers JS, Haugh MC, et al.: Adaptation of clinical guidelines: Literature review and proposition for a framework and procedure. Int J Qual Health Care 2006;18:167-176.
-
(2006)
Int J Qual Health Care
, vol.18
, pp. 167-176
-
-
Fervers, B.1
Burgers, J.S.2
Haugh, M.C.3
-
14
-
-
0036731459
-
Facilitating the use of evidence in practice: Evaluating and adopting clinical guidelines for local use by health care organizations
-
Graham ID, Harrison MB, Brouwers M, et al.: Facilitating the use of evidence in practice: Evaluating and adopting clinical guidelines for local use by health care organizations. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2002;31:599-611.
-
(2002)
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs
, vol.31
, pp. 599-611
-
-
Graham, I.D.1
Harrison, M.B.2
Brouwers, M.3
|