Shanghai urban wetland extraction and classification with remote sensed imageries based on a decision tree model

Jilin Daxue Xuebao (Diqiu Kexue Ban)/Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition)

Volumn 39, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 1156-1162

  Huang, Ying ^a   Zhou, Yun Xuan ^a   Wu, Wen ^a   Kuang, Run Yuan ^a   Li, Xing ^a  

^a EAST CHINA NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Decision tree model; IHS transformation; K T transformation; Remote sensing; Texture analysis; Urban wetland

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION METHODS; CLASSIFICATION RESULTS; COMPLEX PROPERTIES; DECISION TREE MODELS; HIGH PRECISION; IHS TRANSFORMATION; LANDSAT-5; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ALGORITHM; MULTI-SPECTRAL; REMOTE SENSED IMAGERY; SHANGHAI AREA; SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS; TEXTURAL ANALYSIS; TEXTURE ANALYSIS; TM IMAGE;

DECISION TREES; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; REMOTE SENSING; TEXTURES;

WETLANDS;

EID: 74049139075     PISSN: 16715888     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. LI Gui-dong, ZHOU Yun-xuan, TIAN Bo, et al. Shanghai estuarine and coastal wetlands change analysis based on remote sensing and GIS [J]. Journal of Jilin University: Earth Science Edition, 2008, 38 (2): 319-323.
2. HUANG Hua-mei, ZHANG Li-quan, GAO Zhan-guo. The vegetation resource at the intertidal zone in Shanghai using remote sensing [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2005, 25 (10): 2686-2693.
3. LI Tong, WU Hua. Application of decision tree classification to Peking land cover [J]. Remote Sensing Technology and Application, 2004, 19 (6): 485-487.
4. Muchoney D, Borak J, Chi H, et al. Application of MODIS global supervised classification model to vegetation and land cover mapping in Central America [J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2000, 21: 1115-1138.
5. Tso B, Mather P M. Classification methods for remotely sensed data [M]. New York: CRC Press, 2001.
6. Pal M, Mather P M. An assessment of the effectiveness of decision tree methods for land cover classification [J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2003, 86: 554-565.
7. DU Jin-kang, HUANG Yong-sheng, FENG Xue-zhi, et al. Study on water bodies extraction and classification from SPOT image [J]. Journal of Remote Sensing, 2001, 5 (3): 214-219.
8. LI Hui, YU Ming. Wetland information extraction based on decision tree model [J]. Geo-Information Science, 2007, 9 (2): 60-73.
9. WEN Xing-ping, HU Guang-dao. YANG Xiao-feng. Extracting information from ETM+ image using C 5.0 decision tree algorithm [J]. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 2007, 23 (6): 26-29.
10. JIANG Qing-xiang, LIU Hui-ping. Extracting TM image information using texture analysis [J]. Journal of Remote Sensing, 2004, 8 (5): 458-464.
11. Song C H, Woodcock C E, Seto K C, et al. Classification and change detection using Landsat TM data: When and how to correct atmospheric effects [J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2001, 75: 230-224.
12. CHEN Yun, DAI Jin-fang, LI Jun-jie. CART-based decision tree classifier using multi-feature of image and its application [J]. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 2008, 24 (2): 17-21.
13. ZHAO Ying-shi. Analysis and methods of remote sensing application [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2004.
14. McFeeters S K. The use of normalized difference water index (NDWI) in the delineation of open water features [J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1996, 17 (7): 1425-1432.
15. XU Han-qiu. A study on information extraction of water body with the modified normalized difference water index (MNDWI) [J]. Journal of Remote Sensing, 2005, 9 (5): 589-595.
16. ZHA Yong, NI Shao-xiang, YANG Shan. An effective approach to automatically extract urban land-use from TM imagery [J]. Journal of Remote Sensing, 2003, 7 (1): 37-41.
17. LI Xia. A new method to improve classification accuracy with shape information [J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1995, 10 (4): 279-287.