Comparison of kenz lifecorder versus actigraph physical activity output in free-living conditions

Journal of Physical Activity and Health

Volumn 6, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2009, Pages

  Abel, Mark ^a   Hannon, James ^b   Lillie, Tia ^b   Sell, Katie ^c   Anderson, David ^b   Conlin, Geri ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^c HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d WEBER STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Accelerometer; Exercise; Measurement; Motion sensor

Indexed keywords

ACTIMETRY; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EXERCISE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; UNITED STATES;

ACTIGRAPHY; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; EXERCISE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; SOUTHWESTERN UNITED STATES;

EID: 74049131714     PISSN: 15433080     EISSN: 15435476     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1123/jpah.6.s1.s141     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevalence of regular physical activity among adults -United States, 2001-2005. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2007;56(46):1209-1212.
2. Kesaniemi YA, Danforth E, Jr, Jensen MD, Kopelman PG, Lefebvre P, Reeder BA. Dose-response issues concerning physical activity and health: an evidencebased symposium. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33(6, Suppl):S531-S538.
3. Mokdad AH, Marks JS, Stroup DF, Gerberding JL. Actual causes of death in the United States, 2000. JAMA. 2004;291(10):1238-1245. (Pubitemid 38541668)
4. Haskell WL, Lee I, Pate RP, et al. Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;39(8):1423-1434. (Pubitemid 47344026)
5. Freedson PS, Melanson E, Sirard J. Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30(5):777-781. (Pubitemid 28211005)
6. Hendelman D, Miller K, Baggett C, Debold E, Freedson P. Validity of accelerometry for the assessment of moderate intensity physical activity in the field. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32:S442-S449.
7. Nichols JF, Morgan CG, Chabot LE, Sallis JF, Calfas KJ. Assessment of physical activity with the Computer Science and Applications, Inc., accelerometer: laboratory versus field validation. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2000;71:36-43.
8. Swartz AM, Strath SJ, Bassett DR, O'Brien WL, King GA, Ainsworth BE. Estimation of energy expenditure using CSA accelerometers at hip and wrist sites. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32:S450-S456.
9. McClain JJ, Craig CL, Sisson SB, Tudor-Locke C. Comparison of Lifecorder EX and Actigraph accelerometers under free-living conditions. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2007;32:753-761.
10. McClain JJ, Sisson SB, Washington TL, Craig CL, Tudor-Locke C. Comparison of Kenz Lifecorder EX and Actigraph Accelerometers in 10-yr-old children. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;39:630-638. (Pubitemid 46555790)
11. Suzuken Co., LTD. Nagoya, Japan: Kenz Activity Monitor-Operation Manual; 2005.
12. Kumahara H, Schutz Y, Ayabe M, et al. The use of uniaxial accelerometery for the assessment of physicalactivity-related energy expenditure: a validation study against whole-body indirect calorimetry. Br J Nutr. 2004;91:235-243. (Pubitemid 38263540)
13. Actigraph LLC. ActiGraph GT1M Monitor /ActiTrainer and ActiLife Monitor Software User's manual. Acti-Graph. Pensacola, FL: LLC; 2007.
14. Horvath S, Taylor DG, Marsh JP, Kriellaars DJ. The effect of pedometer position and normal gait asymmetry on step count accuracy. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2007;32:409.
15. Corder K, Brage S, Ramachandran A, Snehalatha C, Wareham N, Ekelund U. Comparison of two Actigraph models for assessing free-living physical activity in Indian adolescents. J Sports Sci. 2007;25:1607-1611. (Pubitemid 47542915)
16. Crouter SE, Churilla JR, Bassett DR. Estimating energy expenditure using accelerometers. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2006;98:601-612. (Pubitemid 44762582)