Evaluation of a Bayesian inference network for ligand-based virtual screening

Journal of Cheminformatics

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2009, Pages

  Chen, Beining ^a   Mueller, Christoph ^a   Willett, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 74049116938     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17582946     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1758-2946-1-5     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. AR Leach VJ Gillet, An Introduction to Chemoinformatics Dordrecht: Kluwer 2007
2. Integration of virtual and high-throughput screening. J Bajorath, Nature Rev Drug Discov 2002 1 882 894 12415248
3. Novel technologies for virtual screening. T Lengauer C Lemmen M Rarey M Zimmermann, Drug Discov Today 2004 9 27 34 14761803
4. Integrating virtual screening in lead discovery. TI Oprea H Matter, Curr Opin Chem Biol 2004 8 349 58 15288243
5. J Alvarez B Shoichet eds, Virtual Screening in Drug Discovery Boca Raton: CRC Press 2005
6. Prediction of protein-ligand interactions. Docking and scoring: successes and gaps. AR Leach BK Shoichet CE Peishoff, J Med Chem 2006 49 5851 5 17004700
7. Computer-aided drug design: integration of structure-based and ligand-based approaches in drug design. P Prathipati A Dixit AK Saxena, Curr Comput-Aided Drug Design 2007 3 133 48
8. Chemical similarity searching. P Willett JM Barnard GM Downs, J Chem Inf Comput Sci 1998 38 983 96
9. Why do we need so many chemical similarity search methods? RP Sheridan SK Kearsley, Drug Discov Today 2002 7 903 11 12546933
10. Approaches to measure chemical similarity - a review. N Nikolova J Jaworska, QSAR Combin Sci 2003 22 1006 26
11. Molecular similarity: a key technique in molecular informatics. A Bender RC Glen, Org Biomol Chem 2004 2 3204 18 15534697
12. Molecular similarity and diversity in chemoinformatics: from theory to applications. AG Maldonado JP Doucet M Petitjean B-T Fan, Mol Divers 2006 10 39 79 16404528
13. Similarity metrics and descriptor spaces - which combinations to choose? RC Glen SE Adams, QSAR Combin Sci 2006 25 1133 42
14. Chemical similarity searches: when is complexity justified? RP Sheridan, Expert Opin Drug Discov 2007 2 423 30
15. Molecular similarity analysis in virtual screening: foundations, limitation and novel approaches. H Eckert J Bajorath, Drug Discov Today 2007 12 225 33 17331887
16. Similarity methods in chemoinformatics. P Willett, Ann Review Inf Sci Technol 2009 43 3 71
17. Evaluation of an inference network-based retrieval model. H Turtle WB Croft, ACM Trans Inf Systems 1991 9 187 222
18. TREC and TIPSTER experiments with InQuery. JP Callan WB Croft J Broglio, Inf Proc Manag 1995 31 327 43
19. Searching distributed collections with inference networks. JP Callan Z Lu WB Croft, Proceedings of the 18th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval 1995 21 8
20. PIC Matrices: A computationally tractable class of probabilistic query operators. WR Greiff WB Croft H Turtle, ACM Trans Inf Systems 1999 17 367 405
21. Combining the language model and inference network approaches to retrieval. D Metzler WB Croft, Inf Proc Manag 2004 40 735 50
22. T Strohman D Metzler H Turtle WB Croft, Indri: A Language Model-Based Search Engine for Complex Queries University of Massachussetts CIIR Technical Report 2005 http://ciir.cs.umass.edu/pubfiles/ir-407.pdf
23. A statistical interpretation of term specificity and its application in retrieval. K Spärck Jones, J Docum 1972 28 11 21
24. Index term weighting. K Spärck Jones, Inf Storage Retriev 1973 9 616 33
25. Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. G Salton C Buckley, Inf Proc Manag 1988 24 513 23
26. Textual and chemical information retrieval: different applications but similar algorithms. P Willett, Inf Research 2000 5 http://InformationR.net/ir/5-2/infres52.html
27. EM Voorhees DK Harman, TREC: Experiment and Evaluation in Information Retrieval Cambridge MA: MIT Press 2005
28. Two-stage language models for information retrieval. CX Zhai J Laverty, Proceedings of the 25th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval 2002 49 56
29. The properties of known drugs. 1. Molecular frameworks. GW Bemis MA Murcko, J Med Chem 1996 39 2887 93 8709122
30. S Siegel NJ Castellan, Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences New York: McGraw-Hill 1988
31. Analysis and display of the size dependence of chemical similarity coefficients. JD Holliday N Salim M Whittle P Willett, J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2003 43 819 28 12767139
32. Similarity-based virtual screening with a Bayesian inference network. A Abdo N Salim, ChemMedChem 2009 4 210 18 19072820
33. Data fusion in ligand-based virtual screening. P Willett, QSAR Combin Sci 2006 25 1143 52
34. Comparison of fingerprint-based methods for virtual screening using multiple bioactive reference structures. J Hert P Willett DJ Wilton, et al. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2004 44 1177 85 15154787
35. Lingos, finite state machines, and fast similarity searching. JA Grant JA Haigh BT Pickup A Nicholls RA Sayle, J Chem Inf Model 2006 46 1912 8 16995721
36. Swift: an index structure for reduced graph descriptors in virtual screening and clustering. JR Fischer M Rarey, J Chem Inf Model 2007 47 1341 53 17567122
37. New methods for ligand-based virtual screening: use of data-fusion and machine-learning techniques to enhance the effectiveness of similarity searching. J Hert P Willett DJ Wilton, et al. J Chem Inf Model 2006 46 462 70 16562973
38. Turbo similarity searching: effect of fingerprint and dataset on virtual-screening performance. EJ Gardiner VJ Gillet M Haranczyk, et al. Stat Anal Data Mining 2009
39. Effectiveness of retrieval in similarity searches of chemical databases: a review of performance measures. SJ Edgar JD Holliday P Willett, J Mol Graph Model 2000 18 343 57 11143554
40. Evaluating virtual screening methods: good and bad metrics for the "early recognition" problem. J-F Truchon CI Bayly, J Chem Inf Model 2007 47 488 508 17288412
41. Recommendations for evaluation of computational methods. AN Jain A Nicholls, J Comput Aided Mol Des 2008 22 3-4 133 139 18338228
42. A comparison of some measures of inter-molecular structural similarity. P Willett V Winterman, Quant Struct-Activ Relat 1986 5 18 25
43. Use of structure-activity data to compare structure-based clustering methods and descriptors for use in compound selection. RD Brown YC Martin, J Chem Inf Comput Sci 1996 36 572 84
44. Performance of similarity measures in 2D fragment-based similarity searching: comparison of structural descriptors and similarity coefficients. X Chen CH Reynolds, J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2002 42 1407 14 12444738