Cost-effective semantic annotation of XML schemas and web service interfaces

SCC 2009 - 2009 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 372-379

  Küngas, Peep ^a   Dumas, Marlon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TARTU   (Estonia)

Author keywords

Cost effective annotation methods; SA WSDL; Semantic annotation; Web services interfaces; WSDL; XML Schemas

Indexed keywords

ANNOTATION METHODS; SEMANTIC ANNOTATION; SEMANTIC ANNOTATIONS; WSDL; XML SCHEMAS;

COST EFFECTIVENESS; COSTS; MARKUP LANGUAGES; ONTOLOGY; SEMANTICS; SIMULATED ANNEALING; XML;

WEB SERVICES;

EID: 74049106152     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/SCC.2009.17     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. M. Burstein, "Ontology mapping for dynamic service invocation on the Semantic Web," Proceedings of AAAI Spring Symposium on Semantic Web Services, Palo Alto, CA, USA, March 2004.
2. M. Brian Blake and Michael N. Huhns, "Web-scale workflow: integrating distributed services," IEEE Internet Computing, vol. 12, no. 1, 2008, pp. 55-59.
3. Stephen Dill, Nadav Eiron, David Gibson, Daniel Gruhl, R. Guha, Anant Jhingran, Tapas Kanungo, Kevin S. McCurley, Sridhar Rajagopalan, Andrew Tomkins, John A. Tomlin, and Jason Y. Zien, "A case for automated large-scale semantic annotation," Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, vol. 1, no. 1, December 2003, pp. 115-132.
4. M. Erdmann, A. Maedche, H. Schnurr, and S. Staab, "From manual to semi-automatic semantic annotation: about ontology-based text annotation tools," Proceedings of the COLING 2000 Workshop on Semantic Annotation and Intelligent Content, Saarbrücken, Germany, August 2000.
5. J. Farrell and H. Lausen, "Semantic Annotations for WSDL and XML Schema (SAWSDL)," W3C Recommendation, 2007, http://www.w3.org/TR/sawsdl.
6. K. Gomadam, A. Ranabahu, L. Ramaswamy, A. P. Sheth, and K. Verma, "Mediatability: estimating the degree of human involvement in XML schema mediation," IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing, Irvine, CA, USA, August 2008, pp. 394-401.
7. E. Hyvönen, K. Viljanen, J. Tuominen, and K. Seppälä, "Building a national semantic web ontology and ontology service infrastructure - the FinnONTO approach," Proceedings of the European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC), Tenerife, Spain, June 2008.
8. A. Heş, E. Johnston, and N. Kushmerick, "ASSAM: A tool for semi-automatically annotating semantic web services," Proceedings of the 3rd International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2004), Hiroshima, Japan, 2004.
9. A. Kalja, A. Reitsakas, and N. Saard, "eGovernment in Estonia: best practices," Technology Management: A Unifying Discipline for Melting the Boundaries, IEEE, 2005, pp. 500-506.
10. S. Muthaiyah and L. Kerschberg, "Achieving interoperability in e-government services with two modes of semantic bridging: SRS and SWRL," J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer, vol. 3, no. 3, December 2008, pp. 52-63.
11. A. De Nicola, M. Missikoff, and R. Navigli, "A software engineering approach to ontology building," Information Systems, vol. 34, no. 2, April 2009, pp. 258-275.
12. M. Nagarajan, K. Verma, A.P. Sheth, J. Miller, and J. Lathem, "Semantic interoperability of web services - challenges and experiences," Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS), Chicago IL, USA September 2006, pp. 373-382.
13. "Ontology definition metamodel 1.0 beta, OMG adopted specification," The Object Management Group (OMG), http://www.omg.org/ technology/documents/modeling-spec-catalog.htm#ODM.
14. D. McGuinness and F. van Harmelen (editors), "OWL web ontology language, W3C Recommendation," February 2004, http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/ REC-owl-features-20040210/.
15. J. Pathak, S. Basu, and V. Honavar, "On context-specific substitutability of web services," Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS), Salt Lake City, UT, USA, July 2007, pp. 192-199.
16. A. Patil, S.A. Oundhakar, A.P. Sheth, and K. Verma, "Meteor-s web service annotation framework," Proceedings of the International World Wide Web Conference (WWW), New York, NY, USA, May 2004, pp. 553-562.
17. M. Pistore, L. Spalazzi, and P. Traverso, "A minimalist approach to semantic annotations for web processes compositions," Proceedings of European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC), Budva, Montenegro, June 2006, pp. 620-634, 2006.
18. J. Rao, P. Küngas, and M. Matskin, "Composition of semantic web services using linear logic theorem proving," Information Systems, vol. 31, nos. 4-5, pp. 340-360, 2006.
19. M. Sabou, "From software APIs to Web service ontologies: a semi-automatic extraction method," Proceedings of the Third International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC2004), Hiroshima, Japan, November, 2004.
20. M. Sabou, C. Wroe, C.A. Goble, and G. Mishne, "Learning domain ontologies for web service descriptions: an experiment in bioinformatics," Proceedings of the International World Wide Web Conference (WWW), Chiba, Japan, May 2005, pp. 190-198.
21. T. Vitvar, M. Kerrigan, A. van Overeem, V. Peristeras, and K. Tarabanis, "Infrastructure for the semantic pan-European e-government services," Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on The Semantic Web meets E-Government (SWEG), Stanford University, CA, USA, March 2006.