A response to castle, McDaniel, and Svihula

Journal of Applied Gerontology

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 697-701

  Powell, Jason L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Foucauldian; Gerontology; Paradigm

Indexed keywords

AGING; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; GERIATRIC CARE; GERONTOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; NOTE; PHILOSOPHY; SOCIAL ASPECT; THEORY;

EID: 74049087961     PISSN: 07334648     EISSN: 15524523     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0733464809337414     Document Type: Note

References (5)

1. Castle, N. (2009). Practice implications: A commentary on Powell?s Foucauldian Toolkit. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 28 (6). 683-684.
2. McDaniel, S. (2009). Challenging gerontology?s empirical molehills: A commentary on Powell?s Foucauldian Toolkit. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 28 (6). 685-689.
3. Powell, J. (2006). Social theory and aging. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
4. Powell, J. (2009). Social theory, aging, and health and welfare professionals: A Foucauldian "toolkit." Journal of Applied Gerontology, 28 (6). 669-682.
5. Svihula, J. (2009). Gerontological theory: A commentary on Powell?s Foucauldian Toolkit. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 28 (6). 690-696.