Optical coherence tomography of macular thickness after biaxial vs coaxial microincision clear corneal cataract surgery

European Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 990-997

  Kurz, Sabine ^a   Krummenauer, Frank ^b   Thieme, Hagen ^a   Dick, H Burkhard ^c  

^a JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^c RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Biaxial phacoemulsification; Microincision cataract surgery; Optical coherence tomography; Retinal thickness

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS; ARTICLE; BIAXIAL MICROINCISION PHACOEMULSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COAXIAL SMALL INCISION PHACOEMULSIFICATION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EFFECTIVE PHACOEMULSIFICATION TIME; FEMALE; FOVEAL THICKNESS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MACULAR THICKNESS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; PHACOEMULSIFICATION; PHACOEMULSIFICATION POWER; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURGICAL APPROACH; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; BLOOD RETINA BARRIER; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORNEA; METHODOLOGY; MICROSURGERY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PHYSIOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RETINA MACULA EDEMA; RETINA MACULA LUTEA;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BLOOD-RETINAL BARRIER; CORNEA; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; MACULA LUTEA; MACULAR EDEMA; MALE; MICROSURGERY; MIDDLE AGED; PHACOEMULSIFICATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 73949160888     PISSN: 11206721     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/112067210901900615     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Ursell PG, Spalton DJ, Whitcup SM, Nussenblatt RB. Cystoid macular edema after phacoemulsification: relationship to blood-aqueous barrier damage and visual acuity. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999; 25: 1492-7.
2. Mentes J, Erakgun T, Afrashi F, Kerci G. Incidence of cystoid macular edema after uncomplicated phacoemulsification. Ophthalmologica 2003; 217: 408-12.
3. Sandberg MA, Brockhurst RJ, Gaudio AR, Berson EL. The association between visual acuity and central retinal thickness in retinitis pigmentosa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46: 3349-54.
4. Mamalis N. Is smaller better? J Cataract Refract Surg 2003; 29: 1049-50.
5. Drexler W, Sattmann H, Herrmann B, et al. Enhanced visualisation of macular pathology with the use of ultrahigh resolution optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol 2003; 121: 695-706.
6. Hee MR, Izatt JA, Swanson EA, et al. Optical coherence tomography of the human retina. Arch Ophthalmol 1995; 113: 325-32.
7. Ko TH, Fujimoto JG, Duker JS, et al. Comparison of ultrahigh-and standard-resolution optical coherence tomography for imaging macular hole pathology and repair. Ophthalmology 2004; 111: 2033-43.
8. Dick HB, Schwenn O, Krummenauer F, Krist R, Pfeiffer N. Inflammation after sclerocorneal versus clear corneal tunnel phacoemulsification. Ophthalmology 2000; 107: 241-7.
9. Linebarger EJ, Hardten DR, Shah GK, Lindstrom RL. Phacoemulsification and modern cataract surgery. Surv Ophthalmol 1999; 44: 123-47.
10. Arshinoff SA. Biaxial phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005; 31: 646.
11. Agarwal A, Agarwal A, Agarwal S, Narang P, Narang S. Phakonit: phacoemulsification through a 0.9 mm corneal incision. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001; 27: 1548-52.
12. Donnenfeld ED, Olson RJ, Solomon R, et al. Efficacy and wound-temperature gradient of Whitestar phacoemulsifi-cation through a 1.2 mm incision. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003; 29: 1097-100.
13. Fine IH, Hoffmann RS, Packer M. Optimizing refractive lens exchange with bimanual microincision phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004; 30: 550-4.
14. Fine IH, Packer M, Hoffman RS. Power modulations in new phacoemulsification technology: Improved outcomes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004; 30: 1014-9.
15. Kurz S, Krummenauer F, Gabriel P, Pfeifer N, Dick B. Biaxial microincision versus small incision clear corneal cataract surgery. Ophthalmology 2006; 113: 1818-26.
16. Olson RJ. Clinical experience with 21-gauge manual microphacoemulsification using Sovereign WhiteStar Technology in eyes with dense cataract. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004; 30: 168-72.
17. Packer M, Fishkind WJ, Fine IH, Seibel BS, Hoffman RS. The physics of phaco: a review. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005; 31: 424-31.
18. Paul T, Braga-Mele R. Bimanual microincisional phacoemulsification: the future of cataract surgery? Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2005; 16: 2-7.
19. Soscia W, Howard JG, Olson RJ. Microphacoemulsification with WhiteStar: a wound-temperature study. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002; 28: 1044-6.
20. Tsuneoka H, Shiba T, Takahashi Y. Feasibility of ultrasound cataract surgery with a 1.4 mm incision. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001; 27: 934-40.
21. Chylack LT Jr, Wolfe JK, Singer DM, et al. The Lens Opacities Classification System III: The Longitudinal Study of Cataract Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol 1993; 111: 831-6.
22. Chauhan DS, Antcliff RJ, Rai PA, Williamson TH, Marshall J. Papillofoveal traction in macular hole formation: the role of optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol 2000; 118: 32-8.
23. Gaudric A, Haouchine B, Massin P, et al. Macular hole formation: new data provided by optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol 1999; 117: 744-51.
24. Spaide RF, Wong D, Fisher Y, Goldbaum M. Correlation of vitreous attachment and foveal deformation in early macular hole states. Am J Ophthalmol 2002; 133: 226-9.
25. Westheimer G. Scaling of visual acuity measurements. Arch Ophthalmol. 1979; 97: 327-30.
26. Konari K, Sawada N, Zhong Y, et al. Development of the blood-retinal barrier in vitro: formation of tight junctions as revealed by occludin and ZO-1 correlates with the barrier function of chick retinal pigment epithelial cells. Exp Eye Res 1995; 61: 99-108.
27. Cornut PL, Francais-Maury C, Mauget-Faysse M. Macular edema from various etiologies. J Fr Ophtalmol 2008; 31: 225-33.
28. Vinores SA, Amin A, Derevjanik NL, Green WR, Campochiaro PA. Immunohistochemical localization of blood-retinal barrier breakdown sites associated with post-surgical macular oedema. Histochem J 1994; 26: 655-65.
29. Browning DJ. Interobserver variability in optical coherence tomography for macular edema. Am J Ophthalmol 2004; 137: 1116-7.
30. Catier A, Tadayoni R, Paques M, et al. Characterization of macular edema from various etiologies by optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol 2005; 140: 200-6.
31. Ching HY, Wong AC, Wong DC, Chan CW. Cystoid macular oedema and changes in retinal thickness after phacoemulsification with optical coherence tomography. Eye 2006; 20: 297-303.
32. Sourdille P, Santiago PY. Optical coherence tomography of macular thickness after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999; 25: 256-61.
33. Degenring RF, Vey S, Kamppeter B, et al. Effect of uncomplicated phacoemulsification on the central retina in diabetic and non-diabetic subjects. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2006; 245: 18-23.