Comparison of Canadian Forest Fire Danger Rating System and National Fire Danger Rating System fire indices derived from Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model data for the June 2005 Interior Alaska wildfires

Atmospheric Research

Volumn 95, Issue 2-3, 2010, Pages 290-306

  Mölders, Nicole ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FAIRBANKS   (United States)

Author keywords

Fire indices; Fire weather; Mesoscale modeling; Polar weather; WRF

Indexed keywords

CANADIAN FORESTS; ENERGY RELEASE; FIRE DANGER RATING SYSTEMS; FIRE RISKS; FIRE WEATHER; FUEL MOISTURE CONTENT; MESOSCALE MODELING; RELATIVE ERRORS; TEMPORAL EVOLUTION; WEATHER RESEARCH AND FORECASTING MODELS;

DEFORESTATION; ERRORS; FIRES; FUELS; MOISTURE; MOISTURE DETERMINATION;

WEATHER FORECASTING;

FOREST FIRE; INDEX METHOD; MESOSCALE METEOROLOGY; MODELING; RISK ASSESSMENT; WEATHER FORECASTING; WILDFIRE;

DEFORESTATION; ERRORS; FIRES; FORECASTS; FUELS; MOISTURE; WEATHER;

ALASKA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 73949160680     PISSN: 01698095     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2009.03.010     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Alaska Climate Center, 2005: http://climate.gi.alaska.edu/.
2. Alexander M.E., and Cole F.V. Rating fire danger in Alaska ecosystems: CFFDRS provides an invaluable guide to systematically evaluating burning conditions. Fireline 12 (2001) 2-3
3. Andrews, P.L., Bradshaw, L.S., 1997. FIRES: Fire Information Retrieval and Evaluation System-a program for fire danger rating analysis. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-GTR-367. Ogden LIT: USDA, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, 64 pp.
4. Burgan R.E. Revisions to the 1978 National Fire-danger Rating System. USDA Forest service. Southeast Forest Experiment Station Research Paper SE-273 (1988) Macon, GA, 39 pp.
5. Carlson J.D., Burgan R.E., Engle D.M., and Greenfield J.R. The Oklahoma Fire Danger Model: an operational tool for mesoscale fire danger rating in Oklahoma. Int. J. Wildland Fire 11 (2002) 183-191
6. Cheng W.Y.Y., and Steenburgh W.J. Evaluation of surface sensible weather forecasts by the WRF and the Eta models over the western United States. Weather Forecast. 20 (2005) 812-821
7. Cohen J.D., and Deeming J.E. The National Fire-danger Rating System: basic equations. General technical report, PSW-82 (1985), Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Berkley, CA 17
8. Davis C., Brown B., and Bullock R. Object-based verification of precipitation forecasts. Part I: Methodology and application to mesoscale rain areas. Mon. Weather Rev. 134 (2006) 1772-1784
9. Deeming J.E., Burgan R.E., and Cohen J.D. The National Fire-danger Rating System-1978. USDA Forest Service. Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station General Technical Report INT-39 (1977) Ogden, UT, 63 pp.
10. Done J., Davis C.A., and Weisman M. The next generation of NWP: explicit forecasts of convection using the weather research and forecasting (WRF) model. Atmos. Sci. Lett. 5 (2004) 110-117
11. Dudhia J. Numerical study of convection observed during the winter monsoon experiment using a mesoscale two-dimensional model. J. Atmos. Sci. 46 (1989) 3077-3107
12. Fosberg M.A. Weather in wildland fire management: the fire weather index. Proceedings of the Conference on Sierra Nevada Meteorology, South Lake Tahoe, Amer. Meteorol. Soc. (1978) 1-4
13. Grell G.A., Peckham S.E., Schmitz R., McKeen S.A., Frost G., Skamarock W.C., and Eder B. Fully coupled "online" chemistry within the WRF model. Atmos. Environ. 39 (2005) 6957-6975
14. Hoadley J.L., Westrick K., Ferguson S.A., Goodrick S.L., Bradshaw L., and Werth P. The effect of model resolution in predicting meteorological parameters used in fire-danger rating. J. Appl. Meteor. 43 (2004) 1333-1347
15. Hoadley J.L., Rorig M.L., Bradshaw L., Ferguson S.A., Westrick K.J., Goodrick S.L., and Werth P. Evaluation of MM5 model resolution when applied to prediction of national fire-danger rating indexes. Int. J. Wildland Fire 15 (2006) 147-154
16. Kain J.S., Weiss S.J., Levit J.J., Baldwin M.E., and Brigh D.R. Examination of convection-allowing configurations of the WRF model for the prediction of severe convective weather: the SPC/NSSL spring program 2004. Weather Forecast. 21 (2006) 167-181
17. Klemp J.B., and Skamarock W.C. Model numerics for convective-storm simulation. In: Fedorovich E., Rotunno R., and Stevens B. (Eds). Atmospheric turbulence and mesoscale meteorology (2004), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 117-137
18. Kleschenko A., Grom L., Ndiaye M., and Stefanski R. The impacts of agrometeorological applications for sustainable management of farming, forestry and lifestock systems. WMO/TD No. 1175 (2004) 70
19. Knievel J.C., Ahijevych D.A., and Manning K.W. Using temporal modes of rainfall to evaluate the performance of a numerical weather prediction model. Mon. Weather Rev. 132 (2004) 2995-3009
20. Lynch J.A., Clark J.S., Bigelow N.H., Edwards M.E., and Finney B.P. Geographic and temporal variations in fire history in boreal ecosystems of Alaska. J. Geophys. Res. 108D1 (2003) 8152 10.1029/2001JD000332
21. Mlawer E.J., Taubman S.J., Brown P.D., Iacono M.J., and Clough S.A. Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the longwave. J. Geophys. Res. 102D (1997) 16663-16682
22. Mölders N., and Kramm G. Influence of wildfire-induced land-cover changes on clouds and precipitation in Interior Alaska - a case study. Atmos. Res. 84 (2007) 142-168
23. Mölders N., Jankov M., and Kramm G. Application of Gaussian error propagation principles for theoretical assessment of model uncertainty in simulated soil processes caused by thermal and hydraulic parameters. J. Hydrometeorol. 6 (2005) 1045-1062
24. Nutter P.A., and Manobianco J. Evaluation of the 29 km-Eta Model Part I: Objective verification at three selected stations. Weather Forecast. 14 (1999) 5-17
25. Podur J., Martell D.L., and Knight K. Statistical quality control analysis of forest fire activity in Canada. Can. J. For. Res. 32 (2002) 195-205
26. PaiMazumder, D., Mölders, N., 2009. Theoretical assessment of uncertainty in regional averages due to network density and design. J. Appl. Meteor. Clim. doi:10.1175/2009JAMC2022.1.
27. Skamarock W.C., Klemp J.B., Dudhia J., Gill D.O., Baker D.M., Wang W., and Powers J.G. A description of the advanced research WRF version 2. NCAR Technical Note, NCAR/TN-468+STR (2005) 88
28. Smirnova T.G., Brown J.M., and Benjamin S.G. Performance of different soil model configurations in simulating ground surface temperature and surface fluxes. Mon. Weather Rev. 125 (1997) 1870-1884
29. Smirnova T.G., Brown J.M., Benjamin S.G., and Kim D. Parameterization of cold season processes in the MAPS land-surface scheme. J. Geophys. Res. 105D (2000) 4077-4086
30. Stocks B.J., Fosberg M.A., Wotten M.B., Lynham T.J., and Ryan K.C. Climate change and forest fire activity in North American Boreal Forests. In: Kasischke E.S., and Stocks B.J. (Eds). Fire, Climate Change, and Carbon Cycling in North American Boreal Forest (2000), Springer, New York 368-376
31. Thompson G., Rasmussen R.M., and Manning K. Explicit forecasts of winter precipitation using an improved bulk microphysics scheme. Part I: Description and sensitivity analysis. Mon. Weather Rev. 132 (2004) 519-542
32. Tian X.-R., McRae D.J., Boychuk D., Jin J.-Z., Gao C.-D., Shu L.-F., and Wang M.-Y. Comparisons and assessment of forest fire danger systems. For. Stud. China 7 (2007) 53-61
33. van Nest T.A., and Alexander M.E. Systems for rating fire danger and predicting fire behavior used in Canada. Proceedings of National Interagency Fire Behavior Workshop, March 1-5, 1999 (1999) 13
34. van Wagner C.E. Convection temperatures above low intensity forest fires. Can. For. Serv. Bi-mon. Res. Notes 31 (1975) 21-26
35. van Wagner C.E. Development and structure of the Canadian Forest Weather Index System. Canadian Forest Service, For. Tech. Rep. vol. 35 (1987) 37 pp.
36. Viegas X.D., Bovio G., Ferreira A., Nosenzo A., and Sol B. Comparative study of various methods of fire danger evaluation in southern Europe. Int. J. Wildland Fire 9 (1999) 235-246
37. von Storch H., and Zwiers F.W. Statistical Analysis in Climate Research (1999), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 484 pp.
38. Wang W., and Seaman N.L. A comparison study of convective parameterization schemes in a mesoscale model. Mon. Weather Rev. 125 (1997) 252-278
39. White B.G., Paegle J., Steenburgh W.J., Horel J.D., Swanson R.T., Cook L.K., Onton D.J., and Miles J.G. Short-term forecast validation of six models. Weather Forecast. 14 (1999) 84-108
40. Wilks D.S. Statistical Methods in Atmospheric Sciences (1995), Academic Press, San Diego 467 pp.
41. Xue M., Droegemeier K.K., Wong V., Shapiro A., Brewster K., Carr F., Weber D., Liu Y., and Wang D. The Advanced Regional Prediction System (ARPS) - a multi-scale nonhydrostatic atmospheric simulation and prediction tool. Part II: Model physics and applications. Meteorol. Atmos. Phys. 76 (2001) 143-165
42. Zhong S., In H.J., Bian X., Charney J., Heilman W., and Potter B. Evaluation of real-time high-resolution MM5 predictions over the Great Lakes region. Weather Forecast. 20 (2005) 63-81