Receiver operating characteristic analysis for the evaluation of diagnosis and prediction

Radiology

Volumn 253, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 593-596

  Gatsonis, Constantine A ^a  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL EVALUATION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EDITORIAL; METHODOLOGY; PREDICTION; PREDICTIVE VALIDITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; BREAST TUMOR; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; NOTE; RADIOGRAPHY; RADIOLOGY;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; RADIOLOGY; ROC CURVE;

EID: 73949149992     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2533091633     Document Type: Editorial

References (22)

1. Shiraishi J, Pesce LL, Metz CE, Doi K. Experimental design and data analysis in receiver operating characteristic studies: lessons learned from reports in Radiology from 1997 to 2006. Radiology 2009;253(3):822-830.
2. Chakraborty DP, Berbaum KS. Observer studies involving detection and localization: modeling, analysis, and validation. Med Phys 2004;31(8):2313-2330.
3. Bandos AI, Rockette HE, Song T, Gur D. Area under the free-response ROC curve (FROC) and a related summary index. Biometrics 2009;65(1):247-256.
4. Shiu SY, Gatsonis C. The predictive receiver operating characteristic curve for the joint assessment of the positive and negative predictive value. Philos Transact A Math Phys Eng Sci 2008;366(1874):2313-2333.
5. Metz CE. ROC methodology in radiologic imaging. Invest Radiol 1986;21:720-733.
6. Metz CE. Basic principles of ROC analysis. Semin Nucl Med 1978;8:283-298.
7. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982;143: 29-36.
8. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 1983;148:839-843.
9. Zhou XH, Obuchowski N, McClish D. Statistical methods in diagnostic medicine. New York, NY: Wiley, 2002.
10. Pepe M. The statistical evaluation of medical tests for classification and prediction. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2003.
11. Pepe M. Receiver operating characteristic methodology. J Am Stat Assoc 2000;95(449): 308-311.
12. Obuchowski NA. Multireader, multimodality receiver operating characteristic curve studies: hypothesis testing and sample size estimation using an analysis of variance approach with dependent observations. Acad Radiol 1995;2(suppl 1):S22-S29.
13. Ishwaran H, Gatsonis C. A general class of hierarchical ordinal regression models with applications to correlated ROC analysis. Can J Stat 2000;28(4):731-750.
14. Gatsonis C, McNeil BJ. Collaborative evaluations of diagnostic tests: experience of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group. Radiology 1990;175(2):571-575.
15. Beam CA, Layde PM, Sullivan DC. Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists: findings from a national sample. Arch Intern Med 1996; 156(2):209-213.
16. Tosteson AN, Begg CB. A general regression methodology for ROC curve estimation. Med Decis Making 1988;8(3):204-215.
17. Toledano AY, Gatsonis C. Ordinal regression methodology for ROC curves derived from correlated data. Stat Med 1996;15(16): 1807-1826.
18. Beiden SV, Wagner RF, Campbell G. Components-of-variance models and multiplebootstrap experiments: an alternative method for random-effects, receiver operating characteristic analysis. Acad Radiol 2000;7(5):341-349.
19. Gatsonis C. Design of evaluations of imaging technologies: development of a paradigm. Acad Radiol 2000;7(9):681-683.
20. Pencina MJ, D'Agostino RB Sr, D'Agostino RB Jr, Vasan RS. Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond. Stat Med 2008;27(2):157-172.
21. Heagerty PJ, Lumley T, Pepe MS. Time-dependent ROC curves for censored survival data and a diagnostic marker. Biometrics 2000;56(2):337-344.
22. Obuchowski NA, McClish DK. Sample size determination for diagnostic accuracy studies involving binormal ROC curve indices. Stat Med 1997;16(13):1529-1542.