Novel approach to data analysis in cocaine-conditioned place preference

Behavioural Pharmacology

Volumn 20, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 720-730

  Dela Cruz, Adriane M ^a   Herin, David V ^a   Grady, James J ^a   Cunningham, Kathryn A ^a  

^a University of Texas Medical Branch School of Medicine   (United States)

Author keywords

Animal model; Classical conditioning; Classification and regression tree analysis; Rat; Serotonin 2C receptor; Statistical analysis

Indexed keywords

6 CHLORO 2 (1 PIPERAZINYL)PYRAZINE; COCAINE; SEROTONIN 2C RECEPTOR;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; COCAINE DEPENDENCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; MALE; NONHUMAN; PLACE PREFERENCE; RAT; RELIABILITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ANIMALS; BENZAZEPINES; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM STIMULANTS; COCAINE; CONDITIONING (PSYCHOLOGY); DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; DRUG INTERACTIONS; INJECTIONS, INTRAPERITONEAL; MALE; MODELS, ANIMAL; N-METHYL-3,4-METHYLENEDIOXYAMPHETAMINE; PYRAZINES; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; RECEPTORS, DOPAMINE D1; SEROTONIN AGONISTS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 73949137250     PISSN: 09558810     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/FBP.0b013e328333b266     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Adams JU, Careri JM, Efferen TR, Rotrosen J (2001). Differential effects of dopamine antagonists on locomotor activity, conditioned activity and conditioned place preference induced by cocaine in rats. Behav Pharmacol 12:603-611.
2. Allan AM, Galindo R, Chynoweth J, Engel SR, Savage DD (2001). Conditioned place preference for cocaine is attenuated in mice over-expressing the 5-HT(3) receptor. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 158:18-27.
3. Bardo MT, Bevins RA (2000). Conditioned place preference: what does it add to our preclinical understanding of drug reward? Psychopharmacology (Berl) 153:31-43.
4. Belzung C, Barreau S (2000). Differences in drug-induced place conditioning between BALB/c and C57Bl/6 mice. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 65:419-423.
5. Bevins RA, Cunningham CL. (2006). Place conditioning: a methodological analysis. In: Anderson MJ, editor. Tasks and techniques: A sampling of methodologies for the investigation of animal learning, behavior, and cognition. New York: Nova Science Publishers Inc; pp. 99-110.
6. Blander A, Hunt T, Blair R, Amit Z (1984). Conditioned place preference: an evaluation of morphine's positive reinforcing properties. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 84:124-127.
7. Brabant C, Quertemont E, Tirelli E (2005). Influence of the dose and the number of drug-context pairings on the magnitude and the long-lasting retention of cocaine-induced conditioned place preference in C57BL/6J mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 180:33-40.
8. Bubar MJ, Cunningham KA (2008). Prospects for serotonin 5-HT2R pharma-cotherapy in psychostimulant abuse. Prog Brain Res 172:319-346.
9. Callahan PM, Cunningham KA (1995). Modulation of the discriminative stimulus properties of cocaine by 5-HT1B and 5-HT2C receptors. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 274:1414-1424.
10. Carr G, Fibiger HC, Phillips AG (1989). Conditioned place preference as a measure of drug reward. In: Liebman JM, Cooper SJ, editors. The neuro-pharmacological basis of reward. Oxford, UK: Clarendon; pp. 264-319.
11. Childress AR, Ehrman R, Rohsenow DJ, Robbins SJ, O'Brien CP (1992.) Classically conditioned factors in drug dependence. In: Lowinson JH, Ruiz P, Millman RB, Langrod JG, editors. Substance abuse: a comprehensive textbook. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; pp. 56-69.
12. Childress AR, Mozley PD, McElgin W, Fitzgerald J, Reivich M, O'Brien CP (1999). Limbic activation during cue-induced cocaine craving. Am J Psychiatry 156:11-18.
13. Crabbe JC, Wahlsten D, Dudek BC (1999). Genetics of mouse behavior: interactions with laboratory environment. Science 284:1670-1672.
14. Cunningham CL, Ferree NK, Howard MA (2003). Apparatus bias and place conditioning with ethanol in mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 170:409-422.
15. Daza-Losada M, Ribeiro Do CB, Manzanedo C, Aguilar MA, Rodriguez-Arias M, Minarro J (2007). Rewarding effects and reinstatement of MDMA-induced CPP in adolescent mice. Neuropsychopharmacology 32:1750-1759.
16. Durazzo TC, Gauvin DV, Goulden KL, Briscoe RJ, Holloway FA (1994). Cocaine-induced conditioned place approach in rats: the role of dose and route of administration. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 49:1001-1005.
17. Filip M, Cunningham KA (2003). Hyperlocomotive and discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine are under the control of serotonin(2C) [5-HT(2C)] receptors in rat prefrontal cortex. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 306:734-743.
18. Filip M, Bubar MJ, Cunningham KA (2004). Contribution of serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) 5-HT2 receptor subtypes to the hyperlocomotor effects of cocaine: acute and chronic pharmacological analyses. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 310:1246-1254.
19. Fletcher PJ, Grottick AJ, Higgins GA (2002). Differential effects of the 5-HT(2A) receptor antagonist M100907 and the 5-HT(2C) receptor antagonist SB242084 on cocaine-induced locomotor activity, cocaine self-administration and cocaine-induced reinstatement of responding. Neuropsychophar-macology 27:576-586.
20. Isaac WL, Nonneman AJ, Neisewander J, Landers T, Bardo MT (1989). Prefrontal cortex lesions differentially disrupt cocaine-reinforced conditioned place preference but not conditioned taste aversion. Behav Neurosci 103:345-355.
21. Kennett GA (1993). 5-HT1C receptors and their therapeutic relevance. Curr Opin Invest Drugs 2:317-362.
22. Kupperman M (1960). On comparing two observed frequency counts. Appl Stat 9:37-42.
23. Lemon SC, Roy J, Clark MA, Friedmann PD, Rakowski W (2003). Classification and regression tree analysis in public health: methodological review and comparison with logistic regression. Ann Behav Med 26:172-181.
24. Lewis RJ (2000). An introduction to classification and regression tree (CART) analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, San Francisco, CA.
25. Liu S, Cunningham KA (2006). Serotonin(2C) receptors (5-HT(2C)R) control expression of cocaine-induced conditioned hyperactivity. Drug Alcohol Depend 81:275-282.
26. Martin-Iverson MT, Reimer AR (1996). Classically conditioned motor effects do not occur with cocaine in an unbiased conditioned place preferences procedure. Behav Pharmacol 7:303-314.
27. Mead AN, Vasilaki A, Spyraki C, Duka T, Stephens DN (1999). AMPA-receptor involvement in c-fos expression in the medial prefrontal cortex and amygdala dissociates neural substrates of conditioned activity and conditioned reward. Eur J Neurosci 11:4089-4098.
28. Neisewander JL, Acosta JI (2007). Stimulation of 5-HT2C receptors attenuates cue and cocaine-primed reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior in rats. Behav Pharmacol 18:791-800.
29. Nomikos GG, Spyraki C (1988). Cocaine-induced place conditioning: importance of route of administration and other procedural variables. Psychophar-macology (Berl) 94:119-125.
30. O'Brien MS, Anthony JC (2005). Risk of becoming cocaine dependent: epidemiological estimates for the United States, 2000-2001. Neuropsycho- pharmacology 30:1006-1018.
31. O'Dell LE, Khroyan TV, Neisewander JL (1996). Dose-dependent characterization of the rewarding and stimulant properties of cocaine following intraperitoneal and intravenous administration in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 123:144-153.
32. Roma PG, Riley AL (2005). Apparatus bias and the use of light and texture in place conditioning. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 82:163-169.
33. Sheskin DJ. (2004). Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
34. Shippenberg TS, Heidbreder C (1995). Sensitization to the conditioned rewarding effects of cocaine: pharmacological and temporal characteristics. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 273:808-815.
35. Spyraki C, Fibiger HC, Phillips AG (1982). Cocaine-induced place preference conditioning: lack of effects of neuroleptics and 6-hydroxydopamine lesions. Brain Res 253:195-203.
36. Zhang H, Holford T, Bracken MB (1996). A tree-based method of analysis for prospective studies. Stat Med 15:37-49.