Recent global trends in forest tenures

Forestry Chronicle

Volumn 85, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 849-858

  Kant, Shashi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Australia; Canada; Commercialization; Corporatization; Forest enterprise; Forest tenure; Germany; New Zealand; Privatization; South Africa; Sweden; Transition economies; United Kingdom

Indexed keywords

COMMERCE; COMPETITION; PRIVATIZATION; TIMBER;

AUSTRALIA; CANADA; COMMERCIALIZATION; CORPORATIZATION; FOREST ENTERPRISE; FOREST TENURE; GERMANY; NEW ZEALAND; SOUTH AFRICA; SWEDEN; TRANSITION ECONOMY; UNITED KINGDOM;

FORESTRY;

COMMERCIALIZATION; FOREST ECOSYSTEM; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FOREST PRODUCT; GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE; PLANTATION FORESTRY; PRIVATIZATION; TENURE SYSTEM; TIMBER INDUSTRY; TIMBER MARKET; TIMBER TRADE; TRANSITIONAL ECONOMY;

AUSTRALIA; CANADA; COMPETITION; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FORESTRY; FORESTS; GERMANY; HARVESTING; NEW ZEALAND; SOUTH AFRICA; SWEDEN; UNITED KINGDOM;

AUSTRALIA; CANADA; GERMANY; NEW ZEALAND; SOUTH AFRICA; SWEDEN; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 73949135441     PISSN: 00157546     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5558/tfc85849-6     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Arnot, C. D. 2007. Perceived tenure security and incentives for investment in Canadian forest tenures: A literature review and empirical analysis. M. Sc. Thesis, Department of Rural Economy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB.
2. Asserståhl, R. 2006. Privatizing state forests in Sweden. Presented at the BC Forum Symposium "Creating New Opportunities: Forest Tenure and Land Management in BC", November 1, 2006.
3. Birchfield, R. J. and I. E. Grant. 1993. Out of the woods - the restructuring and sale of New Zealand's state forests. GP Publications, Wellington, New Zealand. 250 p.
4. Clarke, J. 1997. Logging costs skyrocketing in BC. Logging and Sawmilling Journal 28(4):5-6.
5. Dlomo, M and M. Pitcher. 2005. Juggling Social and Economic Goals: South Africa. In M. Garforth and J. Mayers (eds.). Plantation, Privatization, Poverty, and Power: Changing Ownership and Management of State Forests. pp. 223-245. Earthscan, London.
6. Douglas, R. 1993. Unfinished business. Random House New Zealand Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand. 305 p.
7. Grundy, D.2005. From plantation development to steward of the Nation's Forests: the UK In M. Garforth and J. Mayers (eds.). Plantation, Privatization, Poverty, and Power: Changing Ownership and Management of State Forests. pp. 246-265. Earthscan, London.
8. Haley, D. 1996. Paying the piper. The cost of the British Columbia Forest Practices Code. RPF Forum 3(5):26-28.
9. Haley, D. and H. Nelson. 2007. Has the time come to rethink Canada's Crown forest tenure systems? The Forestry Chronicle 83(5):630-641.
10. Kant, S. 2000. A dynamic approach to forest regimes in developing economies. Ecological Economics 32(2):287-300.
11. Kant, S. 2009. Sale of Canada's public forests: Economically nonviable option. The Forestry Chronicle 85(6):841-848.
12. Kirkland, A. 1988. The rise and fall of multiple-use forest management in NZ. NZ J. Forestry 33(1):9-12.
13. Kirkland, A. and P. Berg. 1997. A century of state-honed enterprise. Profit Books Auckland, New Zealand. 176 p.
14. Lu, R. 2008. Preferences of Industry and Government Stakeholders for Characteristics of Forest Tenures in Canada - An Application of Best-worst Scaling Methods. M. Sc. Thesis, Department of Rural Economy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB.
15. Luckert, M. 2009. Considering Privatization in Canada's Forest Tenures. Presented at the OPFA Annual General Body Meeting, April 23-24, 2009, Sudbury, Ontario.
16. Mayers, J., J. Evan and T. Foy. 2001. Raising the Stakes: Impacts of privatization, certification and partnerships in South African forestry. IIED, London.
17. Minister's Council on Forest Sector Competitiveness. 2005. Final Report of the Minister's Council on Forest Sector Competitiveness, May 2005. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Toronto, ON. 46 p.
18. Nelson, H. and W. Nikolakis. 2008. How does corporatization improve performance of government agencies? Lessons from restructuring of state owned agencies in Australia. Draft Paper.
19. O'Loughlin, C. 2008. Institutional restructuring, reforms, and other changes within the New Zealand forestry sector since 1986. In P.
20. Durst, C. Brown, J. Broadhead, R. Suzuki, R. Leslie and A. Inoguchi (eds.) Reinventing Forestry Agencies: Experiences of Institutional Restructure in Asia and the Pacific. FAO, Rome.
21. Perley, C. J. K. 2003. Resourcism and preservationism in New Zealand forestry: an end to the dichotomy. NZ J. Forestry 48(2):11-17.
22. Pollard, D. 2007. Issues in Corporatization in Australian Forestry, presented at the BC Forum on Forest Policy and Economics, BC, May 11, 2007.
23. Roche, M. 1990. History of New Zealand Forestry. GP Publications Ltd., Wellington, New Zealand. 466 p.
24. Roering, H.-W. 2004. Study of Forestry in Germany. Federal Research Centre for Forestry and Forest Products, Hamburg, Germany.
25. The World Bank. 2005. Forest Institutions in Transition: Experience and Lessons from Eastern Europe. PROFOR at the World Bank, Washington, DC.
26. Vertinsky, I. 2009. The Design of Tenure Institutions: The Challenge of Governing the Forests. Draft.
27. VicForests. 2008. VicForests Annual Report 2008. Available at www.vicforests.com.au/assets/docs/vicforests%20annual%20report %202008.pdf [Accessed March 19, 2009].