Melanoma high-risk families' perceived health care provider risk communication

Journal of Cancer Education

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 301-307

  Loescher, Lois J ^a,b   Crist, Janice D ^a   Cranmer, Lee ^b   Curiel Lewandrowski, Clara ^b   Warneke, James A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FAMILY; FEMALE; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION; GENETICS; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MALE; MELANOMA; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SKIN TUMOR;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; FAMILY; FEMALE; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION TO DISEASE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MALE; MELANOMA; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; SKIN NEOPLASMS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 73949133150     PISSN: 08858195     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08858190902997290     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. ACS. Cancer Facts and Figures, 2007. American Cancer Society. Available at http://www.cancer.org/downloads/STT/CAFF2007 PWSecured.pdf. Accessed June 19, 2007.
2. Kefford RF, Newton Bishop JA, Bergman W, et al. Counseling and DNA testing for individuals perceived to be genetically predisposed to melanoma: a consensus statement of the Melanoma Genetics Consortium. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:3245-3251.
3. Greene MH. The genetics of hereditary melanoma and nevi. 1998 update. Cancer. 1999; 86:2464-2477.
4. Goldstein AM, Tucker MA. Genetic epidemiology of familial melanoma. Dermatol Clin. 1995; 13:605-612.
5. Balch CM, Buzaid AC, Soong SJ, et al. Final version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for cutaneous melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2001; 19:3635-3648.
6. Weinstock MA. Early detection of melanoma. JAMA. 2000; 284:886-889.
7. Weinstock MA. Point-counterpoint. Mass population skin cancer screening can be worthwhile-(if it's done right). J Cutan Med Surg. 1998; 2:129-132.
8. Brady MS, Oliveria SA, Christos PJ, et al. Patterns of detection in patients with cutaneous melanoma. Cancer. 2000; 89:342-347.
9. Berwick M, Begg CB, Fine JA, et al. Screening for cutaneous melanoma by skin self-examination. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996; 88:17-23.
10. CDC. Preventing skin cancer: findings of the Task Force on Community Preventive Services on reducing exposure to ultraviolet light and counseling to prevent skin cancer: recommendations of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. MMWR Morb Mort Wkly Rep. 2003; 52:1-18.
11. National Research Council. Improving Risk Communication. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1989.
12. National Research Council. Risk communication: working with individuals and communities to weigh the odds, 1995. National Research Council, USPHS. Available at http://odphp.osophs.dhhs.gov/pubs/ prevrpt/Archives/95fm1.htm. Accessed November 23, 2007.
13. Edwards A, Elwyn G, Mulley A. Explaining risks: turning numerical data into meaningful pictures. BMJ. 2002; 324:827-830.
14. Fong GT, Rempel LA, Hall PA. Challenges to improving health risk communication in the 21st century: a discussion. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1999; 25:173-176.
15. Rothman AJ, Kiviniemi MT. Treating people with information: an analysis and review of approaches to communicating health risk information. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1999; 25:44-51.
16. Lipkus IM, Hollands JG. The visual communication of risk. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1999; 25:149-163.
17. Lipkus IM, Klein WM, Rimer BK. Communicating breast cancer risks to women using different formats. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2001; 10:895-898.
18. Croyle RT, Lerman C. Risk communication in genetic testing for cancer susceptibility. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1999; 25:59-66.
19. Geller AC, Emmons KM, Brooks DR, et al. A randomized trial to improve early detection and prevention practices among siblings of melanoma patients. Cancer. 2006; 107:806-814.
20. Hay J, Ostroff J, Martin A, et al. Skin cancer risk discussions in melanoma-affected families. J Cancer Educ. 2005; 20:240-246.
21. Dolan NC, Ng JS, Martin GJ, et al. Effectiveness of a skin cancer control educational intervention for internal medicine housestaff and attending physicians. J Gen Intern Med. 1997; 12:531-536.
22. Robinson JD, Silk KJ, Parrott RL, et al. Healthcare providers' sunprotection promotion and at-risk clients' skin-cancer-prevention outcomes. Prev Med. 2004; 38:251-257.
23. Sandelowski M. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurs Health. 2000; 23:334-340.
24. Morse JM, Strategies for sampling. In, Morse JM, ed. Qualitative Nursing Research-A Contemporary Dialogue. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1991:127-145.
25. Sandelowski M. Sample size in qualitative research. RINAH. 1995; 18:179-183.
26. DeSantis L, Ugarriza DN. The concept of theme as used in qualitative nursing research. West J Nurs Res. 2000; 22:351-372.
27. ATLAS.ti. ATLAS.ti Scientific Software. Element5 Inc.; 2006.
28. Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, eds. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1994:105-117.
29. Smith VA, DeVellis BM, Kalet A, et al. Encouraging patient adherence: primary care physicians' use of verbal compliance-gaining strategies in medical interviews. Patient Educ Couns. 2005; 57:62-76.
30. Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Welch HG. Risk communication in clinical practice: putting cancer in context. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1999:25;124-133.
31. Zickmund S, Hillis SL, Barnett MJ, et al. Hepatitis C virus-infected patients report communication problems with physicians. Hepatology. 2004; 39:999-1007.
32. Lynch HT, Lynch JF. Familial factors and genetic predisposition to cancer: population studies. Cancer Prev Detect. 1991; 15:49-57.
33. Christos PJ, Oliveria SA, Masse LC, et al. Skin cancer prevention and detection by nurses: attitudes, perceptions, and barriers. J Cancer Educ. 2004; 19:50-57.
34. Ashbury FD, Iverson DC, Kralj B. Physician communication skills: results of a survey of general/family practitioners in Newfoundland. Med Educ Online [serial online]. 2001; 6:1. Available at: http:// www.med-ed-online.org
35. Weinstein ND. Testing four competing theories of health-protective behavior. Health Psychol. 1993; 12:324-333.
36. American Association of Dermatology. Public Center, 2007. Available at http://www.aad.org/public/index.html. Accessed November 4, 2007.
37. Robinson JK, Rigel DS. Sun protection attitudes and behaviors of solid-organ transplant recipients. Dermatol Surg. 2004; 30:610-615.
38. Buller DB, Buller MK. Approaches to communicating preventive behaviors. Semin Oncol Nurs. 1991; 7:53-63.
39. Fiscella K, Meldrum S, Franks P, et al. Patient trust: is it related to patient-centered behavior of primary care physicians? Med Care. 2004; 42:1049-1055.
40. Gurmankin AD, Baron J, Armstrong K. Intended message versus message received in hypothetical physician risk communications: exploring the gap. Risk Anal. 2004; 24:1337-1347.
41. Back A. Patient-physician communication in oncology: what does the evidence show? Oncology. 2006;20:67-74; discussion 77- 68, 83.
42. Aspinwall LG. Introduction of section: persuasion for the purpose of cancer risk reduction: understanding responses to risk communications. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1999;25:88-93.
43. IOM. Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. Speaking of Health: Assessing Health Communication Strategies for Diverse Populations. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press; 2002.
44. Cherry DK, Woodwell DA, Rechtsteiner EA. National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2005 summary. Adv Data. 2007:1-39.
45. Rodgers JE. Introduction of section: overarching considerations in risk communications: romancing the message. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1999:25;21-22.
46. Hart A, Henwood F, Wyatt S. The role of the Internet in patientpractitioner relationships: findings from a qualitative research study. J Med Internet Res. 2004; 6(3):e36.
47. Rimer BK, Glassman B. Is there a use for tailored print communications in cancer risk communication? J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1999; 25:140-148.
48. Naylor M, Robinson JK. Sunscreen, sun protection, and our many failures. Arch Dermatol. 2005; 141:1025-1027.
49. Arkin EB. Cancer risk communication-what we know. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1999; 25:182-185.