Things that are right with the traditional square of opposition

Logica Universalis

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 3-11

  Parsons, Terence ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 73949128551     PISSN: 16618297     EISSN: 16618300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11787-007-0031-x     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. E. J. Ashworth, Existential assumptions in late medieval logic, American Philosophical Quarterly 10, 1973 (141-147).
2. A. Augustine, Concerning the Teacher and on the Immortality of the Soul Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, 1938.
3. A. De Morgan, Formal Logic, reprinted by University Press of the Pacific, Honolulu, 2003.
4. H. Hopkins and H. Richardson (translators), Complete Philosophical and Theological Treatises of Anselm of Canterbury, The Arthur J. Banning Press, Minneapolis, 2000.
5. J.N. Keynes, Studies and Exercises in Formal Logic, Macmillan, London, 1887.
6. G. Klima, Ars Artium: Essays in Philosophical Semantics, Mediaeval and Modern. Institute of Philosophy, Hungarian Academy of Sciences; Budapest, 1988.
7. T. Parsons, The traditional square of opposition, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2006 Edition), E.N. Zalta (ed.), URL = http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2006/entries/square/.
8. T. Parsons, A Construction of Medieval Logic, draft; currently available at http://admin.cdh.ucla.edu/webpage.php?par=91.