Image registration accuracy of a 3-dimensional transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy system

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine

Volumn 28, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 1561-1568

  Guo, Yujun ^a   Werahera, Priya N ^b   Narayanan, Ramkrishnan ^a   Li, Lu ^a   Kumar, Dinesh ^a   Crawford, E David ^c   Suri, Jasjit S ^a  

^a Eigen Inc   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

3 dimensional transrectal ultrasound; Elastic warping interpolation; Phantom validation; Prostate cancer; Surface based registration; Thin plate spline interpolation

Indexed keywords

BIOPSY; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; DISEASES; GRAPHICS PROCESSING UNIT; IMAGE REGISTRATION; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; LOCATION; PORE PRESSURE; PROGRAM PROCESSORS; ULTRASONICS; UROLOGY;

PHANTOM VALIDATION; PROSTATE CANCERS; SURFACE-BASED REGISTRATION; THIN PLATE SPLINE; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND;

INTERPOLATION;

ARTICLE; AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; BIOPSY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; ECHOGRAPHY; EVALUATION; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE SUBTRACTION; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; PROSTATE; RECTUM; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

BIOPSY; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; PROSTATE; RECTUM; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 73949115845     PISSN: 02784297     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7863/jum.2009.28.11.1561     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin 2008; 58:71-96.
2. Hodge KK, McNeal JE, Terris MK, Stamey TA. Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. J Urol 1989; 142:71-74.
3. Gann PH, Han M. The natural history of clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA 2005; 293:2149-2151.
4. Lerner SE, Blute ML, Bergstralh EJ, Bostwick DG, Eickholt JT, Zincke H. Analysis of risk factors for progression in patients with pathologically confined prostate cancers after radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 1996; 156:137-143.
5. Sakr WA, Grignon DJ, Crissman JD, et al. High grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and prostatic adenocarcinoma between the ages of 20-69: an autopsy study of 249 cases. In Vivo 1994; 8:439-443.
6. Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program, 1975-2003. Rockville, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2006.
7. Kawata N, Miller GJ, Crawford ED, et al. Laterally directed biopsies detect more clinically threatening prostate cancer: computer simulated results. Prostate 2003; 57:118-128.
8. Damber JE, Aus G. Prostate cancer. Lancet 2008; 371: 1710-1721.
9. Crawford ED, Hirano D, Werahera PN, et al. Computer modeling of prostate biopsy: tumor size and location - not clinical significance - determine cancer detection. J Urol 1998; 159:1260-1264.
10. Lubeck DP, Grossfeld GD, Carroll PR. A review of measurement of patient preferences for treatment outcomes after prostate cancer. Urology 2002; 60:72-77.
11. Meng MV, Elkin EP, Harlan SR, Mehta SS, Lubeck DP, Carroll PR. Predictors of treatment after initial surveillance in men with prostate cancer: results from CaPSURE. J Urol 2003; 170:2279-2283.
12. Wilson SS, Crawford ED. Screening for prostate cancer: current recommendations. Urol Clin North Am 2004; 31:219-226.
13. Cooperberg MR, Moul JW, Carroll PR. The changing face of prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:8146-8151.
14. Barqawi A, Crawford ED. Focal therapy in prostate cancer: future trends. BJU Int 2005; 95:273-274.
15. Crawford ED, Wilson SS, Torkko KC, et al. Clinical staging of prostate cancer: a computer-simulated study of transperineal prostate biopsy. BJU Int 2005; 96:999-1004.
16. Shen F, Shinohara K, Kumar D, et al. Three-dimensional sonography with needle tracking: role in diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer. J Ultrasound Med 2008; 27:895-905.
17. Shen D, Davatzikos C. An adaptive-focus deformable model using statistical and geometric information. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 2000; 22:906-913.
18. Bookstein FL. Principal warps: thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 1989; 11:567-585.
19. Davatzikos C, Prince JL, Bryan RN. Image registration based on boundary mapping. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1996; 15: 112-115.
20. Wei L, Werahera PN, Shinohara K, et al. Accurate and reproducible 3-dimensional transrectal ultrasound - guided prostate biopsy for diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer. Grand Rounds Urol 2008; 2:15-19.
21. Shen F, Narayanan R, Suri JS. Rapid motion compensation for prostate biopsy using GPU. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Conference. Piscataway, NJ: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers; 2008:3257-3260.