Safety and efficacy of percutaneous insertion of peritoneal dialysis catheters under sedation and local anaesthetic

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation

Volumn 24, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 3499-3504

  Henderson, Scott ^a   Brown, Edwina ^a   Levy, Jeremy ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE HEALTHCARE NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Dialysis access; Peritoneal dialysis; Peritonitis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BACTERIUM CULTURE; BACTERIUM ISOLATION; CATHETER; CATHETER INFECTION; COAGULASE NEGATIVE STAPHYLOCOCCUS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIALYSATE; ENTEROCOCCACEAE; FEMALE; HUMAN; KLEBSIELLA PNEUMONIAE; LOCAL ANESTHESIA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; METHICILLIN RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; PERITONITIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSEUDOMONAS; SEDATION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; WOUND INFECTION; CATHETERIZATION; INSTRUMENTATION; LENGTH OF STAY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED;

HYPNOTIC SEDATIVE AGENT; LOCAL ANESTHETIC AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANESTHETICS, LOCAL; CATHETERIZATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPNOTICS AND SEDATIVES; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; PERITONITIS;

EID: 73949109484     PISSN: 09310509     EISSN: 14602385     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfp312     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Ansell D, Feehally J, Feest TG, et al. UK Renal Registry Report 2007. UK Renal Registry, Bristol, UK. 2007
2. Chandna SM, Farrington K. Residual renal function: considerations on its importance and preservation in dialysis patients. Semin Dial 2004; 17: 196-201
3. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. IPG208 Laparo-scopic insertion of peritoneal dialysis catheters: clinical guideline. 2007. http://www. nice. org. uk/nicemedia/pdf/IPG208guidance. pdf
4. Gadallah MF, Pervez A, el Shahawy MA, et al. Peritoneoscopic versus surgical placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters: a prospective randomised study on outcome. Am J Kidney Dis 1999; 33: 118-122
5. Maya ID. Ultrasound/fluoroscopic-assisted placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters. Semin Dial 2007; 20: 611-615
6. Ozener C, Bihorac A, Akoglu E. Technical survival of CAPD catheters: comparison between percutaneous and conventional surgical placement techniques. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2001; 16: 1893-1899
7. Renal Association. Report of the Renal Association Working Party on Peritoneal Access 2008 (Draft). Renal Association, UK. 2008
8. Maher ER, Stevens J, Murphy C, et al. Comparison of two methods of Tenckhoff catheter insertion. Nephron 1988; 48: 87-88
9. Tenckhoff H, Schechter H. A bacteriologically safe peritoneal access device. ASAIO J 1968; 14: 181-187
10. Levy JB, Brown E, Daley C, et al. Oxford Handbook of Dialysis, 3rd edn. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2009
11. Flanigan M, Gokal R. Peritoneal catheters and exit-site practices toward optimum peritoneal access: a review of current developments. Perit Dial Int 2005; 25: 132-139
12. Strippoli GF, Tong A, Johnson D, et al. Catheter type, placement and insertion techniques for preventing peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; 18: CD004679
13. Mellotte GJ, Ho CA, Morgan SH, et al. Peritoneal dialysis catheters: a comparison between percutaneous and conventional surgical placement techniques. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1993; 8: 626-630