California's standards movement: How english learners have been left out of the equation for success

Latino Education: An Agenda for Community Action Research

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 205-230

  Márquez López, Teresa I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 73949106674     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410613318     Document Type: Chapter

References (30)

1. Bushman, J., Goodman, G., Brown-Welty, S., & Dorn, S. (2001). Educational leadership: Making standards work, Vol. 59, No. 1, September 2001.
2. California Department of Education. (1998). Proposition 227: Educating English learners for the twenty-first century. Sacramento: CA. Retrieved January 16,2001, from http://www.cde.ca.gov/el/
3. California Department of Education. (1999a). California R30 report. Sacramento: CA. Retrieved July 25, 1999, from http://www.cde.ca.gov/demographics/
4. California Department of Education. (1999b). English language development standards, July 1999. Sacramento: CA. Retrieved December 1, 2000, from http://www.cde.ca.gov/standards/
5. California Department of Education. (1999c). Language arts framework, 1997. Sacramento: CA. Retrieved December 1,2001, from http://www.cde.ca.gov/standards/
6. California Department of Education. (2002). California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE) for Mathematics and English Language Arts (ELA) by Program Combined 33 Riverside County and 36 San Bernardino County. Retrieved July 20, 2002, from http://data1.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/ExitProf2.asp?cSelect=33,RIVERSIDE&cYear=2001-02&TestType=E&cAdmin=C&tDate=000000&Pageno=1
7. Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning. (2001). Teaching and California's future: The status of the teaching profession. The California State University Institute for Educational Reform; Policy Analysis for California Education; The University of California, Office of the President; WestEd.
8. Chatham Education Foundation. (2000). Teacher retention survey 2000. Chatham, NC: Chatham Education Foundation.
9. Darling-Hammond, L. (1999). Professional development for teachers: Setting the stage for learning from teaching. The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning. Santa Cruz, CA.
10. Ferguson, R. (1991). Paying for public education: New evidence on how and why money matters. Harvard Journal on Legislation, 28, Summer, 465-498.
11. Goldring, E., & Greenfield, W. (2002). Understanding the evolving concept of leadership in education: Roles, expectations, and dilemmas. In J. Murphy (Ed.), The educational leadership challenge: Redefining leadership for the 21st century. National Society for the Study of Education, Part 1 (pp. 1-19). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12. Haycock, K. (1998). Good teaching matters: How well-qualified teachers can close the gap. Thinking K-12,3(2), 1-14. http://wwwedtrust.org/main/main/reports.asp
13. Ingersoll, R. M. (2001). Teacher turnover, teacher shortages, and the organization of schools. University of Washington: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
14. Johnson, S. M. (2000). Teaching's next generation. Education Week on the Web. Retrieved September 2001, from www.edweek.org/ew/ewstory.cfm?slug+39johnson.h19&keywords=Susan?Moore%Johnson.
15. LA Times. (2003, July 10). http://www.latimes.com/news/education/la-me-exit10jul10,1,4804851.story?coll=la-news
16. Lugg, C. A., Bulkley, K., Firestone, W. A., & Gardner, C. W. (2002). The contextual terrain facing leaders. In J. Murphy (Ed.), The educational leadership challenge: Redefining leadership for the 21st century. National Society for the Study of Education, Part I (pp. 20-41). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17. Maxwell-Jolly, J., & Gandara, P. (2002). A quest for quality: Providing qualified teachers for California's English learners. In Z. F. Beyknot (Ed.), The power of culture: Teaching across language differences (pp. 43-70). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Publishing Group.
18. McCreight, C. (2000). Teacher attrition, shortage, and strategies for teacher retention. Texas A&M University: Department of Professional Programs. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED444986)
19. Mitchell, D., & Boyns, D. (2001). The California beginning teacher support and assessment program: State evaluation study. Riverside, CA California Education Research Cooperative and the University of California, Riverside.
20. Mitchell, D., Scott, L., & Boyns, D. (1999). The California beginning teacher support and assessment program: State evaluation study. Riverside: California Education Research Cooperative and the University of California, Riverside.
21. Mitchell, D., Scott, L., & Boyns, D. (2000). The California beginning teacher support and assessment program: State evaluation study. Riverside: California Education Research Cooperative and the University of California, Riverside.
22. Mitchell, D. E., Scott, L. D., Hendrick, I. G., & Boyns, D. (1998). The California beginning teacher support and assessment program: State evaluation study. Riverside: California Education Research Cooperative and University of California, Riverside.
23. National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES). (1999). The condition of educationreport. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
24. National Commission on Teaching & America's Future. (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America's future. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
25. Rumberger, R., & Gándara, P. (2000). The schooling of English learners. In E. Burr, G. C. Hayward, B. Fuller, & M. W. Kirst (Eds.), Crucial issues in California education: Are the reform pieces fitting together? (pp. 23-44). Berkeley: University of California, Policy Analysis for California Education.
26. Sweeney, J., & Whitworth, J. (2000). Addressing teacher supply and demand by increasing the success of first-year teachers. Chicago: Paper published at the Annual Meeting of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
27. Toenjes, L. A., Dworkin, A., Gary, L., & Antwanett, N. (2002). The lone star gamble: High stakes testing, accountability and student achievement in Texas and Houston. Unpublished manuscript, The Sociology of Education Research Group (SERG), Department of Sociology, University of Houston.
28. Toppo, G. (2003, July 2). The face of the American teacher, White and female, while her students are ethnically diverse. USA Today. Retrieved December 27, 2004, from http://www.usatoday.com/educate/college/education/articles/20038706.htm.
29. Unz, R. K., & Tuchman, G. M. (1998). The Unz initiative. California Department of Education Web site. Sacramento:CA. [Online]. http://www.cde.ca.gov/el/
30. Uriarte, M. (2002). The high stakes of high stakes testing. in Beykont, Z. F. (Ed.) The power of culture: Teaching across language difference (pp. 3-24). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Publishing Group.