Estimation of glomerular filtration rate with creatinine-based versus cystatin C-based equations in kidney transplant recipients

Iranian Journal of Kidney Diseases

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 234-238

  Savaj, Shokoufeh ^a   Shoushtarizadeh, Tina ^a   Abbasi, Mohammad Amin ^a   Razavimanesh, Sayed Heidar ^a   Ghods, Ahad J ^a  

^a IRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

Cystatin C; Glomerular filtration rate; Kidney transplantation

Indexed keywords

CREATININE; CYSTATIN C;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSAY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CREATININE BLOOD LEVEL; FEMALE; GLOMERULUS FILTRATION RATE; GRAFT RECIPIENT; HUMAN; KIDNEY FUNCTION; KIDNEY GRAFT; LIVING DONOR; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALGORITHMS; COHORT STUDIES; CREATININE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; CYSTATIN C; FEMALE; GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE; HUMANS; KIDNEY FAILURE, CHRONIC; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 73949105766     PISSN: 17358582     EISSN: 17358604     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Gera M, Slezak JM, Rule AD, Larson TS, Stegall MD, Cosio FG. Assessment of changes in kidney allograft function using creatinine-based estimates of glomerular filtration rate. Am J Transplant. 2007;7:880-7.
2. [No author listed]. K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002;39:S1-266.
3. Mussap M, Plebani M. Biochemistry and clinical role of human cystatin C. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2004;41:467-550.
4. White C, Akbari A, Hussain N, et al. Estimating glomerular filtration rate in kidney transplantation: a comparison between serum creatinine and cystatin C-based methods. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16:3763-70.
5. Maillard N, Mariat C, Bonneau C, et al. Cystatin C-based equations in renal transplantation: moving toward a better glomerular filtration rate prediction? Transplantation. 2008;85:1855-8.
6. Mariat C, Alamartine E, Afiani A, et al. Predicting glomerular filtration rate in kidney transplantation: are the K/DOQI guidelines applicable? Am J Transplant. 2005;5:2698-703.
7. Tanaka A, Suemaru K, Araki H. A new approach for evaluating renal function and its practical application. J Pharmacol Sci. 2007;105:1-5.
8. Filler G, Lepage N. Should the Schwartz formula for estimation of GFR be replaced by cystatin C formula? Pediatr Nephrol. 2003;18:981-5.
9. Le Bricon T, Thervet E, Froissart M, et al. Plasma cystatin C is superior to 24-h creatinine clearance and plasma creatinine for estimation of glomerular filtration rate 3 months after kidney transplantation. Clin Chem. 2000;46:1206-7.
10. Rule AD, Bergstralh EJ, Slezak JM, Bergert J, Larson TS. Glomerular filtration rate estimated by cystatin C among different clinical presentations. Kidney Int. 2006;69:399-405.
11. Hoek FJ, Kemperman FA, Krediet RT. A comparison between cystatin C, plasma creatinine and the Cockcroft and Gault formula for the estimation of glomerular filtration rate. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2003;18:2024-31.
12. Larsson A, Malm J, Grubb A, Hansson LO. Calculation of glomerular filtration rate expressed in mL/min from plasma cystatin C values in mg/L. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2004;64:25-30.
13. Risch L, Blumberg A, Huber A. Rapid and accurate assessment of glomerular filtration rate in patients with renal transplants using serum cystatin C. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1999;14:1991-6.
14. Keevil BG, Kilpatrick ES, Nichols SP, Maylor PW. Biological variation of cystatin C: implications for the assessment of glomerular filtration rate. Clin Chem. 1998;44:1535-9.
15. Dharnidharka VR, Kwon C, Stevens G. Serum cystatin C is superior to serum creatinine as a marker of kidney function: a meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002;40:221-6.
16. Poge U, Gerhardt T, Stoffel-Wagner B, et al. Prediction of glomerular filtration rate in renal transplant recipients: cystatin C or modification of diet in renal disease equation? Clin Transplant. 2006;20:200-5.
17. Mussap M, Dalla Vestra M, Fioretto P, et al. Cystatin C is a more sensitive marker than creatinine for the estimation of GFR in type 2 diabetic patients. Kidney Int. 2002;61:1453-61.
18. Beringer PM, Hidayat L, Heed A, et al. GFR estimates using cystatin C are superior to serum creatinine in adult patients with cystic fibrosis. J Cyst Fibros. 2009;8:19-25.
19. Christensson A, Ekberg J, Grubb A, Ekberg H, Lindstrom V, Lilja H. Serum cystatin C is a more sensitive and more accurate marker of glomerular filtration rate than enzymatic measurements of creatinine in renal transplantation. Nephron Physiol. 2003;94:p19-27.
20. White C, Akbari A, Hussain N, et al. Chronic kidney disease stage in renal transplantation classification using cystatin C and creatinine-based equations. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007;22:3013-20.
21. Louvar DW, Rogers TB, Bailey RF, Matas AJ, Ibrahim HN. Cystatin C is not superior to creatinine-based models in estimating glomerular filtration rate in former kidney donors. Transplantation. 2007;84:1112-7.
22. Bostom AG, Kronenberg F, Ritz E. Predictive performance of renal function equations for patients with chronic kidney disease and normal serum creatinine levels. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002;13:2140-4.