Different patterns of physiological and molecular response to drought in seedlings of malt- and feed-type barleys (Hordeum vulgare)

Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science

Volumn 196, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 9-19

  Rapacz, M ^a   Koscielniak J ^a   Jurczyk, B ^a   Adamska, A ^a   Wojcik M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE IN KRAKOW   (Poland)

Author keywords

Chlorophyll a fluorescence; Gas exchange; Gene expression; HVA1; SRG6; Water relations

Indexed keywords

BARLEY; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON FIXATION; CHLOROPHYLL A; DROUGHT RESISTANCE; FODDER; GAS EXCHANGE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENOTYPE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; MOLECULAR ECOLOGY; PHOTOCHEMISTRY; PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; REAL TIME; SEEDLING;

ANIMALIA; HORDEUM; HORDEUM VULGARE;

EID: 73849134365     PISSN: 09312250     EISSN: 1439037X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-037X.2009.00389.x     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. An, Y.-Q., J. M. McDowell, S. Huang, E. C. McKinney, S. Chambliss R. B. Meagher, 1996 : Strong, constitutive expression of the Arabidopsis ACT2/ACT8 actin subclass in vegetative tissues. Plant J. 10, 107 121.
2. Anyia, A. O., J. J. Slaski, J. M. Nyachiro, D. J. Archambault P. Juskiw, 2007 : Relationship of carbon isotope discrimination to water use efficiency and productivity of barley under field and greenhouse conditions. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 193, 313 323.
3. Babu, R. C., J. Zhang, A. Blum, T.-H. Ho, R. Wu H. T. Nguyen, 2004 : HVA1, a LEA gene from barley confers dehydration tolerance in transgenic rice (Oryza sativa L.) via cell membrane protection. Plant Sci. 166, 855 862.
4. Bahieldin, A., H. T. Hesham, H. F. Eissa, O. M. Saleh, A. M. Ramadan, I. A. Ahmed, W. E. Dyer, H. A. El-Itriby M. A. Madkour, 2005 : Field evaluation of transgenic wheat plants stably expressing the HVA1 gene for drought tolerance. Physiol. Plant. 123, 421 427.
5. Barrs, H. D., 1968 : Determination of water deficits in plant tissues. In : T. T. Kozlowski, ed. Water Deficits and Plant Growth, Vol. I, pp. 235 368. Academic Press, New York.
6. Blum, A., 1983 : Breeding crop varieties for stress environments. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 12, 199 238.
7. Blum, A., 1989 : Osmotic adjustment and growth of barley genotypes under drought stress. Crop Sci. 29, 230 233.
8. Cattivelli, L., F. Rizza, F. W. Badeck, E. Mazzucotelli, A. M. Mastrangelo, E. Francia, C. Marè, A. Tondelli A. M. Stanca, 2008 : Drought tolerance improvement in crop plants: an integrated view from breeding to genomics. Field Crops Res. 105, 1 14.
9. Ceccarelli, S., S. Grando A. Impiglia, 1998 : Choice of selection strategy in breeding barley for stress environments. Euphytica 103, 307 318.
10. Chen, G., M. Sagi, S. Weining, T. Krugman, T. Fahima, A. B. Korol E. Nevo, 2004 : Wild barley eibi1 mutation identifies a gene essential for leaf water conservation. Planta 219, 684 693.
11. Comadran, J., J. R. Russell, F. A. van Eeuwijk, S. Ceccarelli, S. Grando, M. Baum, A. M. Stanca, N. Pecchioni, A. M. Mastrangelo, T. Akar, A. Al-Yassin, A. Benbelkacem, W. Choumane, H. Ouabbou, R. Dahan, J. Bort, J.-L. Araus, A. Pswarayi, I. Romagosa, C. A. Hackett W. T. B. Thomas, 2008 : Mapping adaptation of barley to droughted environments. Euphytica 161, 35 45.
12. De Ruiter, J. M., 1999 : Yield and quality of malting barley (Hordeum vulgare L. 'Valetta') in response to irrigation and nitrogen fertilisation. N. Z. J. Crop Hort. Sci. 27, 307 317.
13. Diab, A. A., B. Teulat-Merah, D. This, N. Z. Ozturk, D. Benscher M. E. Sorrells, 2004 : Identification of drought-inducible genes and differentially expressed sequence tags in barley. Theor. Appl. Genet. 109, 1417 1425.
14. Ensminger, I., F. Busch N. P. H. Huner, 2006 : Photostasis and cold acclimation: sensing low temperature through photosynthesis. Physiol. Plant. 126, 28 44.
15. Fischer, R. A. R. Maurer, 1978 : Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I. Grain yield responses. Aus. J. Agric. Res. 29, 897 912.
16. Genty, B., J.-M. Briantais N. R. Baker, 1989 : The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 990, 87 92.
17. Higuchi, R., C. Fockler, G. Dollinger R. Watson, 1993 : Kinetic PCR: real-time monitoring of DNA amplification reactions. Biotechnology 11, 1026 1030.
18. Hoagland, D. R. D. I. Arnon, 1938 : The water-culture method for plants without soil. Univ. Calif. Agr. Exp. Stn. Cir. 347, 29 32.
19. Jana, S. R. W. Wilen, 2005 : Breeding for abiotic stress tolerance in barley. In : M. Ashraf P. J. C. Harris, eds. Abiotic Stresses. Plant Resistance Through Breeding and Molecular Approaches, pp. 491 511. Haworth Press, New York.
20. Jones, H. G., 1983 : Plant and Microclimate. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
21. Kocheva, K. V., M. C. Busheva, G. I. Georgiev, P. H. Lambrev V. N. Goldsev, 2005 : Influence of short-term osmotic stress on the photosynthetic activity of barley seedlings. Biol. Plant. 49, 145 148.
22. Kumar, D., 2005 : Breeding for drought resistance. In : M. Ashraf P. J. C. Harris, eds. Abiotic Stresses. Plant Resistance Through Breeding and Molecular Approaches, pp. 145 176. Haworth Press, New York.
23. Lawlor, D. W. G. Cornic, 2002 : Photosynthetic carbon assimilation and associated metabolism in relation to water deficits in higher plants. Plant Cell Environ. 25, 275 294.
24. Li, R.-H., P.-G. Guo, B. Michael, G. Stefania C. Salvatore, 2006 : Evaluation of chlorophyll content and fluorescence parameters as indicators of drought tolerance in barley. Agr. Sci. China 5, 751 757.
25. Livak, K. J. T. D. Schmittgen, 2001 : Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2 -δδCT method. Methods 25, 402 408.
26. Livak, K. J., S. J. Flood, J. Marmaro, W. Giusti K. Deetz, 1995 : Oligonucleotides with fluorescent dyes at opposite ends provide a quenched probe system useful for detecting PCR product and nucleic acid hybridization. PCR Methods Appl. 4, 357 362.
27. Malatrasi, M., T. J. Close N. Marmiroli, 2002 : Identification and mapping of putative stress response regulator gene in barley. Plant Mol. Biol. 50, 143 152.
28. Orlik, T., M. Wesołowska-Janczarek M. Marzec, 2005 : Comparison of influence of foliar and soil fertilization on fielding of cereals in eroded areas. Acta Agrophys. 5, 367 375.
29. Oukarroum, A., S. El Madidi, G. Schansker R. J. Strasser, 2007 : Probing the responses of barley cultivars (Hordeum vulgare L.) by chlorophyll a fluorescence OLKJIP under drought stress and re-watering. Environ. Exp. Bot. 60, 438 446.
30. Özkara, R., A. Basman, H. Köksel S. Celik, 1998 : Effects of cultivar and environment on β-glucan content and malting quality of Turkish barleys. J. Inst. Brew. 104, 217 220.
31. Praba, M. L., J. E. Cairns, R. C. Babu H. R. Lafitte, 2009 : Identification of physiological traits underlying cultivar differences in drought tolerance in rice and wheat. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 195, 30 46.
32. Pržulj, N., S. Dragović, M. Malešević, V. Momčilovič N. Mladenov, 1998 : Comparative performance of winter and spring malting barleys in semiarid growing conditions. Euphytica 101, 377 382.
33. Rapacz, M., 2002 : Regulation of frost resistance during cold deacclimation and reacclimation in oilseed rape. A possible role of PSII redox state. Physiol. Plant. 115, 236 243.
34. Rapacz, M., 2007 : Chlorophyll a fluorescence transient during freezing and recovery in winter wheat. Photosynthetica 45, 409 418.
35. 2 alleviates the impact of drought on barley improving water status by lowering stomatal conductance and delaying its effects on photosynthesis. Environ. Exp. Bot. 59, 252 263.
36. Shakhatreh, Y., O. Kafawin, S. Ceccarelli H. Saoub, 2001 : Selection of barley lines for drought tolerance in low-rainfall areas. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 186, 119 127.
37. Sivamani, E., A. Bahieldin, J. M. Wraith, T. Al-Niemi, W. E. Dyer, T.-H. D. Ho R. Qu, 2000 : Improved biomass productivity and water use efficiency under water deficit conditions in transgenic wheat constitutively expressing the barley HVA1 gene. Plant Sci. 155, 1 9.
38. Ślesak, I., B. Karpinska, E. Surówka, Z. Miszalski S. Karpinski, 2003 : Redox changes in the chloroplast and hydrogen peroxide are essential for regulation of C(3)-CAM transition and photooxidative stress responses in the facultative CAM plant Mesembryanthemum crystallinum L. Plant Cell Physiol. 44, 573 581.
39. Strasser, R. J. M. Tsimilli-Michael, 2001 : Stress in plants, from daily rhythm to global changes, detected and quantified by the JIP-test. Chem. Nouv. 75, 3321 3326.
40. Szira, F., A. F. Bálint, A. Börner G. Galiba, 2008 : Evaluation of drought-related traits and screening methods at different developmental stages in spring barley. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 194, 334 342.
41. Talame, V., N. Z. Ozturk, H. J. Bohnert R. Tuberosa, 2007 : Barley transcript profiles under dehydration shock and drought stress treatments: a comparative analysis. J. Exp. Bot. 58, 229 240.
42. Teulat, B., C. Borries D. This, 2001 : New QTLs identified for plant water-status, water-soluble carbohydrate and osmotic adjustment in a barley population grown in a growth-chamber under two water regimes. Theor. Appl. Genet. 103, 161 170.
43. Tong, S., Z. Ni, H. Peng, G. Dong Q. Sun, 2007 : Ectopic overexpression of wheat TaSrg6 gene confers water stress tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Sci. 172, 1079 1086.
44. Von Korff, M., S. Grando, A. Del Greco, D. This, M. Baum S. Ceccarelli, 2008 : Quantitative trait loci associated with adaptation to Mediterranean dryland conditions in barley. Theor. Appl. Genet. 117, 653 669.
45. Wade, M. J., 2002 : A gene's eye view of epistasis, selection and speciation. J. Evol. Biol. 15, 337 346.
46. Xiao, B., Y. Huang, N. Tang L. Xiong, 2007 : Over-expression of a LEA gene in rice improves drought resistance under the field conditions. Theor. Appl. Genet. 115, 35 46.
47. Xu, D., X. Duan, B. Wang, B. Hong, T.-H. D. Ho R. Wu, 1996 : Expression of late embryogenesis abundant protein gene, HVA1, from barley confers tolerance to water deficits and salt stress in transgenic rice. Plant Physiol. 110, 249 257.