Social infrastructure to integrate science and practice: The experience of the Long Tom Watershed Council

Ecology and Society

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2009, Pages

  Flitcroft, Rebecca L ^a   Dedrick, Dana C ^b   Smith, Courtland L ^c   Thieman, Cynthia A ^d   Bolte, John P ^c  

^a USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

^b Long Tom Watershed Council Executive Director   (United States)

^c OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d Long Tom Watershed Council   (United States)

Author keywords

Habitat restoration; Oregon; Science and practice; Social infrastructure; Water quality; Watershed councils; Watershed management; Watershed organizations

Indexed keywords

DATA ACQUISITION; HABITAT RESTORATION; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER PLANNING; WATER QUALITY; WATERSHED;

OREGON; UNITED STATES;

STRONGYLURA KREFFTII;

EID: 73849091623     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17083087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5751/ES-03231-140236     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Berkes, F., and C. Folke, editors. 1998. Linking social and ecological systems: management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK.
2. Bolte, J. P., D. W. Hulse, S. V. Gregory, and C. Smith. 2006. Modeling biocomplexity-actors, landscapes and alternative futures. Environmental Modeling and Software 22(5):570-579.
3. Coe-Juell, L. 2005. The Oregon plan: a new way of doing business. Pages 181-220 in R. D. Brunner, T. A. Steelman, L. Coe-Juell, C. M. Cromley, C. M. Edwards, and D. W. Tucker, editors. Adaptive governance integrating science, policy and decision making. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA.
4. Dale, V. H., S. Brown, R. A. Haeuber, N. T. Hobbs, N. Huntly, R. J. Naiman, W. E. Riebsame, M. G. Turner, and T. J. Valone. 2000. Ecological principles and guidelines for managing the use of land. Ecological Applications 10(3)639-670.
5. Daniels, S. E., and G. B. Walker. 2001. Working through environmental conflict: the collaborative learning approach. Praeger, Westport, Connecticut, USA.
6. Dedrick, D., and C. Thieman. 2005. Long Tom Watershed conservation strategy. [online] URL: http://www.longtom.org/documents/archive_reports/conservation_strategy3.pdf.
7. Johnson, B. 2007. Sustaining watershed collaboratives: the issue of coordinator-board relationships. Institute for Policy Research and Innovation, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA.
8. Kauffman, J. B., R. L. Beschta, N. Otting, and D. Lytjen. 1997. An ecological perspective of riparian and stream restoration in the western United States. Fisheries 22:12-24
9. Kenney, D. S. 2005. In search of sustainable water management: international lessons for the American West and beyond. Edward Elgar Publishers, Northampton, Massachusetts, USA.
10. Lamberson, R. H. 2002. Special issue on individual-based models. Natural Resource Modeling 15(1).
11. Lamy, F., J. Bolte, M. Santelmann, and C. Smith. 2002. Development and evaluation of multiple objective decision-making methods for watershed management planning. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 38(2):517-530.
12. Larsen, D. P., T. M. Kincaid, S. E. Jacobs, and N. S. Urquhart. 2001. Designs for evaluating local and regional scale trends. BioScience 51(2):1069-1078.
13. Long Tom Watershed Council (LTWC). 2003a. Long Tom Watershed Council Charter. [online] URL: http://www.longtom.org/documents/archive_ reports/Charter_2003.pdf.
14. Long Tom Watershed Council (LTWC). 2003b. Sub-watershed enhancement program. [online] URL: http://www.longtom.org/subwater3.html.
15. Long Tom Watershed Council (LTWC). 2008. Annual report. [online] URL: http://www.longtom. org/documents/archive_reports/AnnualReport_2008.pdf.
16. Lurie, S., and M. Hibbard. 2008. Community-based natural resource management: ideals and realities for Oregon watershed councils. Society and Natural Resources 21(5):430-440.
17. The Nature Conservancy. 2009. Conservation action planning. [online] URL: http://www.nature. org/wherewework/northamerica/states/indiana/files/ cap.pdf.
18. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW). 2006. Oregon conservation strategy. ODFW, Salem, Oregon, USA.
19. Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board (OWEB). 2008. About us. [online] URL: http://www.oweb.st ate.or.us/OWEB/about_us.shtml.
20. Reeve, T. 2007. A long-term monitoring-intensive approach to Pacific Northwest watershed restoration. Ecological Restoration 25(1):73-74.
21. Reeve, T., J. Lichatowich, W. Towey, and A. Duncan. 2006. Building science and accountability into community-based restoration: can a new funding approach facilitate effective and accountable restoration? Fisheries 31(1):17-24.
22. Sabatier, P. A., W. Focht, M. Lubell, Z. Trachtenberg, A. Vedlitz, and M. Matlock, editors. 2005. Swimming upstream: collaborative approaches to watershed management. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
23. Thieman, C. 2000. Long Tom Watershed assessment. [online] URL: http://www.longtom.org/ assessment2.html.
24. Thieman, C. 2007. Stream health and water quality in the Long Tom Watershed: 1999-2006. [online] URL: http://www.longtom.org/documents/archive_reports/WQ_Report2007/WQReport_2007.pdf.
25. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2006. American heritage rivers. [online] URL: http://www.epa.gov/rivers/.
26. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 2007. River corridor and wetland restoration. [online] URL: http://www.epa.gov/OWOW/wetlands/ restore/.
27. Williams, J. E., C. A. Wood, and M. P. Dombeck, editors.1997. Watershed restoration: principles and practices. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.