Effect of monitor display on detection of approximal caries lesions in digital radiographs

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 38, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 537-541

  Isidor, S ^a   Faaborg Andersen, M ^a   Hintze, H ^a   Kirkevang, L L ^a   Frydenberg, M ^b   Haiter Neto, F ^c   Wenzel, A ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Dental; Dental caries; Digital; Intraoral radiography; Oral diagnosis; Radiography

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER TERMINAL; DENTAL CARIES; DENTIN; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; ECONOMICS; ENAMEL; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INSTRUMENTATION; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICS; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

COMPUTER TERMINALS; DATA DISPLAY; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTIN; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 73849089527     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/21071028     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Benz C, Mouyen F. Radio-visio-graphie. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1989; 44: 177-179.
2. Wenzel A, Hintze H, Mikkelsen L,Mouyen F. Radiographic detection of occlusal caries in noncavitated teeth. A comparison of conventional film radiographs, digitized radiographs, and RadioVisioGraphy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1991; 72: 621-626.
3. Ludlow JB, Abreu Jr M. Performance of film desktop monitor and laptop displays in caries detection. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999; 28: 26-30.
4. Abreu Jr M, Tyndall AD, Ludlow JB. Detection of caries with conventional digital imaging and tuned aperture computed tomography using SRT monitor and laptop displays. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999; 88: 234-238.
5. Hellén-Halme K, Nilsson M, Petersson A. Digital radiography in general dental practice. A field study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2007; 36: 249-255.
6. National Electrical Manufacturers Association. Setting standards for excellence. Digital imaging and communication in medicine (DICOM) Part 14: Grayscale standard display function. Rosslyn, VI: NEMA.
7. Haiter-Neto F, dos Anjos Pontual A, Frydenberg M, Wenzel A. A comparison of older and newer versions of intraoral digital radiography systems. Diagnosing noncavitated proximal carious lesions. J Am Dent Assoc 2007; 138: 1353-1359.
8. Hellén-Halme K, Petersson A, Warfvinge G, Nilsson M. Effect of ambient light and monitor brightness and contrast settings on the detection of approximal caries in digital radiographs: an in vitro study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008; 37: 380-384.
9. Kutcher MJ, Kalathingal S, Ludlow JB, Abreu Jr M, Platin E. The effect of lighting conditions on caries interpretation with a laptop computer in a clinical setting. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999; 88: 234-238.