Establishing rigour in qualitative radiography research

Radiography

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 62-67

  Murphy, F J ^a   Yielder, J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNITEC INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Qualitative research; Radiography framework; Reliability; Rigour; Trustworthiness; Validity

Indexed keywords

EXTERNAL VALIDITY; INTERNAL VALIDITY; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NOMENCLATURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUALITY CONTROL; RADIOGRAPHY; RELIABILITY; REVIEW;

EID: 73749086046     PISSN: 10788174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2009.07.003     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Roberts P.H., Priest M., and Traynor R. Reliability and validity in research. Nursing Standard 20 44 (2006) 41-45
2. Long T., and Johnson M. Rigour, reliability and validity in qualitative research. including commentary by Burnard P with author response. Clinical Effectiveness in Nursing 4 1 (2000) 30-37
3. Sharts-Hopko N.C. Assessing rigor in qualitative research. Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care 13 4 (2002) 84-86
4. Tuckett A.G. Part II. Rigour in qualitative research: complexities and solutions. Nurse Researcher 13 1 (2005) 29-42
5. Merrriam S. What can you tell from an N of 1? Issues of validity and reliabilty in qualitative research. PAACE Journal of Lifelong Learning 4 (1995) 51-60
6. Miles M., and Huberman A. An expanded source book: qualitative data analysis. 2nd ed (1994), Sage, London
7. Lincoln Y., and Guba E. Naturalistic inquiry (1985), Sage, London
8. Rolfe G. Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: quality and the idea of qualitative research. Journal of Advanced Nursing 53 3 (2006) 304-310
9. Emden C., and Sandelowski M. The good, bad and the relative, part two: Goodness and the criterion problem in qualitative research. International Journal of Nursing Practice 5 (1999) 2-7
10. Tobin G.A., and Begley C.M. Methodological rigour within a qualitative framework. Journal of Advanced Nursing 48 4 (2004) 388-396
11. Morse J.M., Barrett M., Mayan M., Olson K., and Spiers J. Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 1 2 (2002) 1-19
12. Adams J., and Smith T. Qualitative methods in radiography research: a proposed framework. Radiography 9 3 (2003) 193-199
13. Cormack D. The research process in nursing. 4th ed. (2000), Blackwell, Oxford
14. Silverman D. Qualitative research: theory, methods and practice (1999), Sage, London
15. Bradbury-Jones C. Enhancing rigour in qualitative health research: exploring subjectivity through Peshkin's I's. Journal of Advanced Nursing 59 3 (2007) 290-298
16. Bryman A. The debate about quantitative and qualitative research: a question of method or epistemology?. In: de Vaus D. (Ed). Social Surveys vol. 1 (2002), Sage, London 13-29
17. Arminio J., and Hultgren F. Breaking out from the shadow: the question of criteria in qualitative research. Journal of College Student Development 43 4 (2002) 446-456
18. Hammersley M., and Atkinson P. Ethnography: Principles in Practice. 2nd ed. (1995), Routledge, London
19. Koch T. Establishing rigour in qualitative research: the decision trail. Journal of Advanced Nursing 53 1 (2006) 91-100
20. Brever F.K., Mruck R., and Wolff-Michael A. Subjectivity and reflexivity: an introduction. Forum Qualitative Research 1 (2002)
21. Guba E, Lincoln Y. Effective evaluation: Improving the usefulness of evaluation results through responsive and naturalistic approaches. Jossey-Bass; 1992.
22. Emden C., and Sandelowski M. The good, bad and the relative, part one: conceptions of goodness in qualitative research. International Journal of Nursing Practice 4 (1998) 206-212
23. Sandelowski M. Rigor or rigor mortis: the problem of rigor in qualitative research revisited. Advanced in Nursing Science 12 2 (1993) 1-8